Member Info for PUTUP

Chief Elma right there. Short arms and deep pockets too.

Ah. So for you it's a Hold but you'd like others to Strong Buy more. Got it.

Please buy more. Less yabber, more action.

The stock is cheap if the pipeline reopens and we get paid our arrears. That's why we are here. If it doesn't open and we don't get paid then the stock will head lower and we will lose. But this stock and board seems to attract people who tout utter BS, who are incapable of defending their ludicrous claims and who seek to con people into believing preposterous potential values. (The first guy who did this successfully is now in prison.) On top of that, they obviously don't have the muscle to push the stock remotely close to their hyped targets.

Stay steady, stick to the facts and sensible analysis, and block these charlatans that would fleece you of your money. Anyone who has been hear just a modest time has the ability (based on posts that have broken down the requisite calculations) to work out how much GKP receives per barrel of production, how much of that is cost recovery on which no margin is made and how much of that, the remainder, is profit oil less CBC. That is based on a fully ratified existing contract (ie consistent with GKP's operations to date). Do the very simple calculation. It will quickly expose the charlatans for what they are.

Great sport particularly when BS meter is in the red.

Yet another who is incapable of discussing facts and figures but rather resorts to personal attacks. And that's all you got?

Dribble on endless repeat.

When are you going to actually buy some shares? Bid it up. Please.

They're working for $4.20 currently. The issue is Cost Recovery (capex, direct opex and direct Shaikan G&A).

Walleye Capital LLC GULF KEYSTONE PETROLEUM ORD BMG4209G2077 0.90 10/12/23

WorldQuant LLC GULF KEYSTONE PETROLEUM ORD BMG4209G2077 0.68 10/18/23 Reduces further

"The London Stock Exchange is investigating an incident, limiting trade only to FTSE 100, FTSE 250 and global depositary receipts securities."

Not surprisingly, nothing new in that at all.

Reiterated prior update re production of "around 33,000 bopd". (FWIW I have 35k bopd pencilled in for October, 40k bopd for November)

Those expecting the $151 million will be recovered before restart should note "paid for SOME of those arrears"

"would consider opportunities outside of Kazakhstan". LOL oops!

"highly prudent $ 15 /2p "

Profit oil per barrel is only $4.20 per barrel currently and declining with R Factor. From this they need to pay corporate overhead costs. This is earned over time. And yet you think $15 per barrel up front is prudent? Muppet.

If only you had money to buy the stock up

A lot (sometimes most) of trading is conducted off-exchange (off-book) but those trades still need to be reported and you see them going through. What you see marked by some services as a "buy" or "sell" is exchange order book trading (AT = trading through the SETS order book). The buy/sell categorisation is, however, rather misleading. For example, if a seller is aggressive on the offer (in SETS) with good volume to get done, their aggressive (low) offer can get hit. Are these really "buys" or "sells"? Perhaps without the aggressive offer few or less trades would have been conducted. Was the pressure coming from buyers or actually from an aggressive seller (or sellers)? Of course, every single trade has a buyer and a seller so the marking is utterly meaningless under any scenario. All you can really conclude is that a trade for x volume took place at y price. Furthermore, you also can't conclude whether any off-exchange trading was done with just one buyer and seller or multiple of any or both.

Nah. I'm just a human BS meter and that meter is in the red big time when reading the cr*p you post.

You've been here before with the same BS and none of it has ever proven to be anything other than that.

Not at all. Just a statement of fact.

Averaging down. Their earlier buys didn't do at all well.

Muppet ramper Jake has a real problem with mathematics

1 month relative performance. Genel up 9%. GKP up 33%. 6m Genel -33%, GKP - 24%. Some catch up? Or swings and roundabouts? (Those "they must know something" director buys at Genel see to be working out well....)

"Ummm GKP share price is always falling because it has paid out dividends, so why do other companies who have been paying out dividends for years not fall in the same way as you suggest."

Because their dividends were being replaced by earnings. Here, GKP was paying out the CRP as it was received. Excess capital. Quite a peculiar situation and core to understanding the GKP value proposition. Off balance sheet asset monetized to cash which was then distributed. (Of the $151m currently owed, $121 million or so is CRP recovery. There isn't that much more to recover.) Once again, dividends pay out value - they don't create it, and if you are paying out more than you are creating then the stock price has to fall to reflect it.

Not sure what you are referencing re "84 pence was being paid out of the company" but if you are asking about what factors are embedded in the price fall then there is at least the following:

1. It was overvalued to begin with

2. Dividends were paid out - lopped 40p or so off right there

3. Dramatic fall in the price of Brent

4. The move to KBT pricing (announced when the price was circa 208p) - very significant

5. Non receipt of receivables

6. Pipeline closure

The only positive during that time was the brief hitting of the long promised 55k production target

One of the main reasons it fell from three pounds (other than the fact valuation was stretched there) is because 40p of dividends were paid out of the company