RE: Never been closer to income.31 Mar 2024 05:08
I wonder did GL think that Calvalley would come through earlier? With the Phase 1 back money the convertible notes could have been redeemed at 110% plus accrued interest which, while painful, would have been been much cheaper than paying ALL the interest. I presume he knew the risk he was taking. Maybe he just didn't have a choice. (I'll discount the possibility that he just didn't care).
No matter what happened, the note owners were on an incredibly sweet deal at the expense of shareholders. Worst case for them, SOU can pay the money back early and they pocket 10% plus accrued interest after maybe just a few weeks. If the share price goes up they can convert and dribble shares onto the market, making a profit on the shares AND collecting 75% interest on everything converted. And if the share price goes down -- as it did -- they can convert and buy new shares at a massive discount with their 75% interest.
Almost immediately after the convertible notes were issued in June the share price began to nosedive, allowing the note holder to convert large tranches in July, September, October, November, and now again in March. The holder can cherrypick the worst five days in a three week period and convert the interest due to shares at that price. In December we saw that puzzling RNS which indicated that Afriquia's share of the company was falling. Little did most people suspect that EVERYONE's share was falling due to the loan note conversions -- only Afriquia were obliged to report it.
It remains to be seen exactly how things pan out. But this horrendous loan along with the ongoing unexplained delay with Calvalley may just end up costing SOU one sixth of the company for a tiny pittance. I'd love to see GL explain this disaster to shareholders in a proper open forum instead of a selective Q&A. Only once to my knowledge has he hinted (in a recent interview) at how hideous the financial situation has been during his tenure. A bit of straight talking would be appreciated. However, I guess that's not what CEOs are paid for. He's supposed to rally the investors, not spook them.