RE: SoundasaPound29 Aug 2024 00:36
Adama: "Ps200306...stranger things have happened to aim company. Emerald energy comes to mind back in the days..1p ..0.9p ..1p..0.89p..for years then boooom almost within months up to £2.50p."
If M5 was drilled and came in with the same volumes as TE-5, if it cost zero to extract and pipe the gas, and if SOU owned 100% of both of them ... they wouldn't be worth £2.50. You are living a fantasy. Sound Energy has commissioned an analyst to value the company, the valuation is 3.2p including SOU's entire share of the TE-5 horste and assuming Phase 2 goes ahead. When fully derisked it's a few pence more than that. Why on earth would any sane investor pay more? And given SOU's history of years-long delays, why would they pay even that any time soon? If you took your head out of the tea leaves for five seconds you would realise what everyone else does: you are talking utter nonsense and these ridiculous weekly predictions are tragically boring.
"But we all know Ps200306 is kyly75 in disguise...can't fool us.... "
I know you are incapable of distinguishing between any two posters making negative comments. But really! Kylie has been posting here for just over a year. I have been around for YEARS longer than that. Why would I create a second account just to post even more negatively? Oh, and, Kylie is an ex-investor. I am a current holder of millions of SOU shares. I have no vested interest in talking the company down. If you were right about 4p or 6p in the short term I would be walking away with a massive profit. But I'd settle for a spike to 1.3p on Managem completion. Your only beef with me is that I'm a realist.