Member Info for ProfitSniffer

Quady said "It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA"

Do you still stand by that assertion or were you wrong?

What takeover? Hadn't you heard? the company says we're going to production

Or so says the liar that insists he doesn't lie.

I particularly miss his running commentary onsupport and resistance to eight decimal places, cut and pasted off British Bull*** as his own work

100k? Redknight's wife's August pin money

If ScotKio can't join the dots between the climate scam and a tier 1 copper asset, he definitely should not be investing in it. You have to be fully aware that one of the biggest drivers for copper demand aint happening, it's cancelled.

Proven Liar. Here for all to see in black and white

And when he is shown to be a proven liar, he goes off into hiding

Every cloud.....

I'm asking you to admit that you thought that the terms of the offer meant we would give up 59.5% of ENSA, as you stated in your message which I quoted to start off this thread.

You were completely wrong, because you didn't read the RNS properly. The offer would have had us conceding 70% of ENSA not 59.5%

You know full well you got it wrong, then earlier today you had the bare faced cheek to say that you always admit that you were wrong when you are shown to be.

So here's your chance....fill your boots and prove that your words are true.

"It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA"

Do you confirm, deny, or sidestep that assertion?

Now you're just being beyond ridiculous. You know exactly what I mean. But to help you, I will isolate the point

"It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA"

Confirm or deny that assertion (or as we all know you will, ignore it because you're utterly spineless and a liar)

25 Aug 2021 13:32 Good grief read it, it's not a bid for Solgold.The Brisbane-based U.K.-listed miner with assets in Ecuador, the Solomon Islands and Australia, said its board has unanimously rejected BHP Billiton's offer to purchase a 10% stake in SolGold for $30 million in cash and then spend $275 million on the Cascabel project in return for 70% of SolGold's 85% stake in the project.It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA.Someone doesn't even know what a bid for Solgold means. Says a lot for your reputation.

Quady 13:31 "I always admit when I am shown to be wrong."

No you don't, you have consistently refused to admit that you interpreted BHP's offer for 70% of ENSA completely wrongly. I showed you maybe 50 times why you were wrong, and to this very day, you still refuse to admit it.

So you have today confirmed yourself as a bare faced liar. (again)

Close up again

Slack Arse wrong again.

#FollowTheMoney

Agree Quady, they definitely said Cascabel in the streaming deal but at that point there were no plans to use Tandy as a kickstart

They have since approved the PEP but was is unclear is if we need additional funding to do that and it that is a condition of the $650m or if they are happy that Tandy can pay for itself and a chunk of the rest of the Alpala Capex

They should really clarify

Caldwell was/is in God's waiting room though and rarely made any sense.

Pbow yes agreed, but that's where I'm confused. The Capex quoted was for when there was no "extra" cost to start up TAM - but it says in the last RNS they're in agreement with the Project Execution Plan to start up TAM first.

What isn't clear is the costings, who will pay for TAM, will it effectively fund itself and some of the Alpala construction too?

I might email them and ask them to clarify

Ale or no ale, Tam might be part of Cascabel but what as been agreed for the remaining $650bn after tranche 3? Isn't that to construct Alpala?

Using Tam wasn't part of the plan they agreed to

Where would they get the money to start at TAM unless the streamers agree to that route? That would complicate a takeover.

It will be sold as soon as the final steps are in place. There is zero chance this motley crew could organise a knees up in a brewery let alone a mining operation. It took them two years to translate a document into French

Only a complete and utter moron would actually believe that Solgold will take Cascabel to construction themselves.

We can discuss it in person. No need to put the people on here through any more disruption.

You have for many years called me stupid names and been made to look stupid for doing so. You're a very nasty person, you are going to face your nemesis head on and let's see if your attitude remains the same or you shyte your onion sacks

Goodnight!

I'm not interested in your CV, I am interested in why you are such a nasty, fascist arse-hole on here when you wouldn't say boo to a goose in real life.

So we will find out, won't we? Talk all you like when I'm in your face.