Member Info for ProfitSniffer

The Bengal Lancer?

Indeed Eloro, and I imagine Jimmy is seething too, he's only causing trouble on down days

Lovely week, now time to get rat-arsed, footy starts this weekend and we go again Monday. So much to look forward to

2.3m on the ask at 14.98 in the auction to prevent it closing at or above 15

Shenanigans still in play

Somone buy Slack Arse a drink, poor little scrote must be suicidal

First attempt at 15 incoming shortly

Good grief, someone's been busy getting posts deleted

#Butterworth

#Jimmy

Caldwell and Cazzubo, two absolute rotters. We wasted several years under the watch of these two incompetent clowns

We are very well endowed indeed

Drake....Cascabel is more than six times the resource that Warintza is

Back under your rock Slack Arse, you've got it wrong AGAIN

Chump

Perhaps they're already very bullish about Tandy, that is the impression I get from comms with them.

There's only one person twisting things here and that's you. You think that by deflecting from the issue you can avoid answering it. Now everybody can see you for the liar that you are

13 Aug 13:31

Quady says "I always admit when I am shown to be wrong."

#Uninvested

#BareFacedLiar

#Jimmy

You're making yourself look stupid.

You said "It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA"

Your understanding of that proposal was simply wrong. Why can't you admit it? Why do you keep trying to hide from it?

It was a proposal, but why is not also a bid for control of ENSA? In any case it wasn't me who referred to it as a bid, but if you can find any of my posts were I referred to it as such I will happily admit that i did

Now, why can't you admit that you got it wrong? Is your ego/pride too precious? Or is it because it's me who had your pants down and made you look stupid and that is the part that you cannot accept?

I never said it was a bid, I am referring to your lack of understanding of their proposal

Did you or did you not totally misunderstand the figures?

We're not debating whether there was a bid or not, I'm asking you to clarify your understanding of their proposal

You said "It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA"

You were utterly wrong in your understanding. Do you accept that yet? If not then I have proven you to be a liar.

Quady said "It was for a ten percent stake in Solgold and 70% of the 85% of ENSA which equates to 59.5% of ENSA"

Do you still stand by that assertion or were you wrong?

Why won't he answer the question or is he a liar that he is happy to admit he is wrong when shown? 🤥🤥🤥

Semantics I guess, but what we do need on the Solgold team is somebody who understands TA.

The next (imminent) news will now be wasted re-breaking and holding 13p instead of fuelling the next leg up to 20p. It should have been released a few days ago.

I thought we'd turned a corner but it seems not.

You can press back and normally recover it, or if it's a long post do a quick Ctrl-A and copy before hitting submit

It is incredibly annoying.

13 Aug 13:31

Quady says "I always admit when I am shown to be wrong."