Member Info for ProfitSniffer

Time to give him a good pasting I think. Nothing else is going to register with him.

Can't see that merger taking place. But another week of compounding gains would make Slack Arse cry into his overnight oats.

Yes Gino, very sad. Shame it wasn't four lefties

Two major world banks have pulled out of green directives in recent weeks

As they say, follow the money

How can you discredit the report? It is peer reviewed, which is your constant argument for lending weight to the articles you agree with is it not?

Net Zero is done, toast. A busted flush just like you are.

Silly little girl with your daft emojis.

My train of thought is the same as SPC32, I think he refused to accept that it had failed many years back and from there invented stories starting around the time of the $5.2m sales order to create the illusion that it was succeeded. He's never been able to admit defeat and even when cornered for lying in recent weeks, he is still not man enough to fess up to the people he has mentally abused for so many years.

Karma will get him, I have faith.

Apologies, here's the missing link for the missing link

https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July_2025.pdf

Quady says "Climate change is the biggest threat because if we don't address this in time, we will reach the point of no return. The point is we are getting there faster than we thought even ten years ago"

Perhaps he ought to read the US Department of Energy's damning review on climate change alarmism (I've linked the full report below) that has had Guardian readers choking on their Frappes in recent days. The report is put together by noted scientists, and yes it is peer reviewed.

One of the most striking sections says that US Climate policy is all pain, no gain. The report quantifies just how little effect even the most aggressive US climate policies would have using the very models and assumptions of mainstream climate science. The answer? "undetectably small impacts appearing only after centuries, if at all"

They go on to add that this fact is never honestly presented in policy debate.

Now if it's undetectably small in the US, what is it here?

GAME OVER Climate freaks!

And how do you explain it was over 3000ppm before man even existed on this planet? What caused it then? And why isn't that the cause for the tiny uptick now?

The clue is that big yellow thing in the sky. The thing that is going to beam down on me in 10 minutes time in the beer garden

Of course I can deny it, it's based on models not science and certainly not repeatable observable experiments.

Another question you can't answer is how warm SHOULD the Earth be? Species thrive in warmer climates. Less people die. Even if you were stupid enough to think you could control the climate, what then should the climate be and why?

You're absolutely crazy. Which is fine with your own money but not with mine.

Government intervention/policy is not "market forces", markets react to these policies because they have to not because it's a good idea.

As you well know, I understand "climate change" perfectly. It has absolutely nothing at all to do with anything man does. To think it has is to be both arrogant and stupid, traits common amongst your lot.

You need to look past the end of your nose. Reform are coming in next and it has already been stated amongst other things that we will leave the ECHR and scrap Net Zero. We're in the death throes of the pointless self-harm right now.

No it's not market forces at all. You don't subsidise things in a free market. That means no energy subsidy for green shyte and no subsidy for heat pumps and no subsidy for EVs

Question for you - who was buying these things before government mandates interfered? Hardly anyone just PITA willy wavers

No other country comes even close to using as much Coal as China does

https://www.helgilibrary.com/charts/which-country-consumes-the-most-coal

It might be "going green" but year on year it is using even more coal and even more oil

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_in_China#/media/File:China-energy-consumption-by-source.svg

The World doesn't HAVE to change, but things will evolve as they always do. The best and proven way to achieve this is with free market dynamics, not green communists sticking their boots on the throats of normal people trying to make a living.

You probably have somewhere to put a home charger, what about the 46% (I believe that's right) of people in the UK who live in a home where a charger cannot be installed such as terraced houses, blocks of flats etc? Are they going to rush out to buy a milk float just because a bunch of loonies in wellies thin the world will end if they don't stop using petrol and eating meat?

Why not leave it to free market dynamics? Cheapest power sources (coal), cheapest cars (petrol) and let those who want to be virtuous and "save the planet" pay for it out of their own money not ours?

Listen to your own advice. The cheap, prosperous energy is fossil fuels. That is why China and the BRIC nations are all ramping them up fast. To prosper

I know there's precious little between your ears, but the penny will drop eventually. People like you live in your liberal elite middle-class bubbles and don't understand reality. The reality is that we as a nation and as people cannot afford expensive, unreliable energy

Watch and learn China.

Have you got one? Have I got one? Nobody in the West will want them once the mandates are dropped, and that will be happening very soon.

It never ends well when communists interfere in free markets. In this case green communists.

China is absolutely f****d, they have an incoming debt crisis that could make 2008 look like lost change down the sofa.

Who are they going to sell all their rubbish to when nobody is interested in green shyte any more? Who would buy a chinese made EV for example?

You'd be putting your life in their hands. Everything they make is awful quality, cheap and dangerous.

Temporary pause? It's a permanent abandonment. The rest of the West follow.

New plumbing, new rads, new decor after it has all been ruined. The "grant" you speak of is simply our own money, not sure you realise that. If all 30m homes switched to heat pumps and all asked for a grant, where would they get the dosh from?

As I said vast swathes of the country has little to no savings. They don't have four grand kicking about for new heating, and they certainly don't have a more realist £15-20k to toss down the toilet on the green altar.