Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
Absolutely CTSFO. The disease control rate being at 50% when they won't have been as selective for phase 1a. The data looks really good and it seems to be ticking all the boxes. It's proven safe, it's releasing Dox where it needs to be in higher concentrations, can't hope for more.
Haha, true Bein, but he'll occasionally drop Nasdaq in the odd presentation or RNS if he thinks that's what people want to hear.
Bella, pretty simple - it's happened just before the AACR poster, they want to look like a Tx company not a Dx company with a M&A strategy that bankrupt the business and lasted 5 minutes. So when Simon hands out his business cards promising a PDC business, that's what they'll see. NO NEED TO SHOUT, IT'S NOT THAT EXCITING. Yet.
Yeah, exactly that, I used to do it purely for sport, but after a while the same old pointless arguments get stale. I've green boxed the lot of them for a while now, but it's reasonably futile when you see others engaging with them and filling the board anyway.
Reporting doesn't seem to result in permanently stopping disruptive accounts, so that leaves ignoring or binning. If people haven't the discipline not to take the bait, then bin them. If everyone did it, it would actually work as the idiots would just be screaming at themselves in to the abyss.
Always happy to share my starter pack:
LivedataaccountsheppyGeneralOzIcecoolJWBellamyWatching2ToukankahmoonViking.RaiderSlacker246TheValueCurvewyndrumThornogsonD-GeemanTrendz
and Timster, of course.
That's all fine. There's nothing wrong with coming up with a shortlist of better Qs, I agree, in the past the Investormeet host has picked out poor Qs. It's not an issue if they follow up with the remainder on the platform of course.
The opposite can be argued. Rather than hoping they're duplicated, sharing them gives others the chance to submit the same and add weight to them if they want to see them answered. I've shared mine and I'd be delighted if everyone else asked the same...
We'll find out soon enough, I'm sure they're good valuable Qs. Shame the evil telegram gatekeepers don't want to discuss them on here and see if they can be improved. With filters in place, it's still possible to have a sensible conversation on here.
It's a bit odd not to want to share the Qs on here 13th. It doesn't make any difference as they're being submitted anyway. It'll be Alan's prerogative to decide what he wants to answer as it has always been. They did a much better job last time via Investormeet of answering more questions than usual. The problem is that the answers had a shelf life of 5 minutes. If Alan remains clueless on strategy then the Q&A is a waste of time for everyone.
Main focus for me for the session is the science and seeing more of the data, I'll be shoveling down more than a pinch of salt for everything else he says as he's proven time and time again to be full of it. As long as the science proves itself then the potential remains.
Posted again for reference, I'm assuming these are Qs 1-4:
Why was the retail appetite for supporting the business (as demonstrated by the oversubscription at 95p) not used for the raise rather than the HUGE discount given to scumbags that openly admit on podcasts hosted by clout chasing morons like Paul Hill that they're only investing for a fast buck?
What changed from the arrogance of 'don't worry about that - chuckle' to shafting all existing shareholders?
Why has the ava6k strategy changed over the course of a few weeks between the December presentation and the Turner Pope note shown to the 'investors'? Why has phase 1b re-emerged under a different name?
When will the CEO step aside so that someone with some commercial and strategic ability can ensure the future success of this business rather than the lifestyle CEO who's only talent seems to be kicking the can down the road whilst making calamitous naive embarrassing harmful decisions?
Orrrrr.... you could ignore it, report it and discuss the OP rather than FUD. Just a thought.
No one spotted the pattern? Research gets shared, no matter what it relates to, a negative angle is found, repeatedly spammed and the discussion then slumps down to the usual bickering with morons. It's bait and people are suckers for it.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird is going to sh.t on the board and strut around like it won anyway.
Have a good day.
Nice one. Did you follow those bullet points in VDTK? How much did you lose? Where was your fund manager fwiend then?
As you’ll know, businesses change (much like VDTK which is now known as Earnz - sounds respectable). Abakta are now in the clinic with a very promising lead asset proving up their platform. They’re a long way from pre covid. Anyway, we’ll see. If they go down the swanny and Alan renames them Bantz then you’ll have been right.