Systemzero, I don't mind people attempting to deramp but we all would appreciate a little more effort than in your latest moronic post. As the absolute bare minimum you should be asking about the Covid LFT or whether Big Al's house might need repainting by now and how he might need to sell some of his shares to pay for that? Hmm? You, however, have achieved nothing other than to bring shame upon your village during your absence for this latest episode.
Possibly been said already but LOAM sold off 34.98 million NANO shares (43.23% of their holding) between 22nd June & 30 Sept 2022. That, to me, suggests strategic selling rather than because they know anything more than us via the recent RNSs has driven their latest offload.
"Avacta's pre|CISION™ tumour targeting platform can be used to modify a chemotherapy in order to selectively release the active drug in tumour tissue thereby reducing the systemic exposure that causes damage to the body's healthy tissues. pre|CISION™ modified chemotherapies (using already established chemo drugs) are designed to substantially reduce the side effects and improve the overall safety and therapeutic potential of these powerful anti-cancer treatments."
Ronnycant, it means that the level of Doxorubicin found in the tumour is far higher than if it would be if being administered via the current conventional method, via the bloodstream.. The AVA6K is far more concentrated and than Dox and is therefore largely being released in the tumour, rather than flowing around the body. Just my opinion though.
Repeat: They could hardly have agreed to the initial terms if they hadn't known those details at the time of writing the RNS.
The issue is not "funds" timing. It is, why were Monday's RNS details not included in Friday's RNS in view of the above?
People have suggested Insider Trading in the face of an RNS which should have pushed the price up in excess of 50% - where it should have held - but instead it met concerted selling which could only be explained by a second company RNS the next business day which left a very nasty smell. Who knows if it was insider trading but it does cast a shadow over all parties who might have benefitted, lends itself to doubt and deserves to be investigated.
FlyingHigher, contrary to the ridiculous Edison comment, BT would hardly have made his comments about the future (in the latest RNS) if he thought for one moment that Edison's stupid suggestion was in any way valid.