Member Info for PI100

And?

I’m moving away from thinking it’s incompetence to pure corruption now. Taking it private so they can easily dip into the pot of millions for a retirement payday? Not implying, just pondering

Another 4%, now around £38 marcap. At what point is this complete and utter negligence by the board? Yet another 52w low.

Must be news coming, we've had 2 50k sells today and we're 9% red,

And?

What do you class as a decent move? I assume you mean for daily trading rather than long term investing?

I wasn’t around then. Clearly I’ve had a mare. So you see another ramp opportunity here?

Back for more ramping, gggg?

No ****, Sherlock

Don’t think it has ever said £89m.

Cash position at 31 December 2022 was £87.0m (2021: £101.7m) and the Company remains debt free.

End of January update literally says £87m

£87m in the bank. Why are you deliberately misleading?

I still think it’s the dispute. The market priced in a heavy loss from it, but as time goes by and the company shows how badly it is run I suspect it is more and more pricing in a negative outcome and gradually bringing down the marcap to reflect that. £39m for a company that will go bust if it loses is actually quite high a valuation.

HC, fair point but none of us have any clue whether it is 50/50 or better/worse. Given how badly this company is run, it makes you wonder what state the contract was in.

We’re also looking at a circa £15m drop in income this year so that’s another huge hit to the P&L unless we dramatically cut more costs.

Rns for what, Wilson?

It’s the dispute causing it. The poor business outlook is bound to play a part but the bulk of this is the market assuming we lose the dispute.

Damage limitation

Another day, another 52w low

Property scraping the barrel here. Someone liked a post and an employee has a mutual connection.

Means absolutely nothing for us.

Of course be can’t be sued, these people know how to play the game.

No different to JM talking on camera about £100m+ non M&A revenue. It’s absolute nonsense but be very hard to prove he is deliberately misleading anyone. Although that statement was so far fetched it almost does need investigation. I mean, we’re on £6m of non covid revenue so why not just say £50m or something vaguely realistic?