We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
And how do you know he hasn't made any suggestions ? Are you on the board ? In the negotiations ? Thought not. The reason we haven't heard about any suggestions is because rm stipulated that discussions be kept secret, and then promptly broke their own rules by announcing the "new pay offer" . Dave Ward and the union obviously had some ideas for a positive way forward for the company 18 months ago when when Thomson signed the way forward agreement and then promptly renaged and ripped up the agreements. Seeing a pattern here? It's your leader Thomson that is the clueless idiot in this scenario . You're just ****y because dave ward and the union are affecting your profits, why else would you be bothered about royal mail and angry at dave ward? You have nothing to do with them apart from a few piddly shares.
Anger wrote :-
""Dave Ward does not have and should not have anything to do with the business strategy of Royal Mail and the fact he’s apparently devised business plan is absolutely embarrassing and just shows how warped his mind is.""
Yet if the union went in negotiations with no suggestions of an alternative solution and just said "nope we're not having it " I'm sure you would still be on here ranting about what an idiot he is . What are negotiations if not putting alternative solutions on the table?
Yas9 wrote :-
""This msg for the union, a job with current pay, terms and conditions. Is better than no job at all, for all the staff that will lose their jobs because of the current action, the lost revenue by customers putting up two fingers and moving onto dpd etc .""
https://www.facebook.com/279447972595444/posts/pfbid03brsYR54r48twTFvVFvXsTk61jwZwozt5vjmLYbma7yJrgDYH6UaQJKmJwwA2GPPl/?sfnsn=scwspmo
He'll be with you in a minute Dowsie he's busy composing a post calling me a bin dipper and saying everything he explains to me goes over my head, you know , just the usual anger schtik.
Anger I really have no idea where to start with that reply , it makes no sense. "If DW did know why did he write the the government to stop it " ??? Errrrr because he knew?
What exactly oh knower of everything should he have done as union leader then ? And donyou really think whatever it is you might suggest he did would not see us in the same situation as we are in now with vesa , if that was the master plan all along ?
""Scampthedog, AngerSharkz, Maximas, looks like you were correct all along regarding VESA so congratulations on your predictions.""
??? Every man and his dog new this was coming , including the CWU . The only people that apparently were denying it were ST and his buddy Ricky. Funny that.
I don't think so . It seems that it's just some legality to do with the rolling separate function strikes. If things don't progress in the next 10 days and we are only allowed all out strikes I can see the union stringing a lot more consecutive days in one. Maybe even a full week. Members would still be only loosing what they were going to throughout November anyway.
Well that was a very weak childish " mummy , phunt said I did a swear word but I didn't " type retort, but I'll appease you. The this morning comment was about the repeated "rm is loss making " bo77ox you spout daily, then there was a comma , then the comment about your boring news reports. I apologise , that was indeed yesterday. You post so much ****** daily it gets hard to differentiate. Didn't you used to give redceo grief about posting the SP because we could all see it for ourselves? Well guess what , we all read the news to. Clown.
@Anger
Just thought you'd jump on first thing this morning and spout the same cr@p you repeatedly post daily, and report the news like no-one else has access to it. You are 'THEE' weakest and most boring poster on here . Good day.
Anger , the fact that you think the CEO of a company has little to do with the decisions being made shows just how clueless you are really . As far as the jobcentre ripping up t&c's in your face comment goes , like I said, very very infantile , you are like peas in a pod mate.
That's just it JB , he doesn't really give his opinions , his posts are usually just antagonistic statements and proceeds everything with team and closes with the "feeling concerned" emoji. Its becoming a running joke on there. But when quizzed about anything of substance he rarley replies or addresses the subject. Its all very very infantile .
Tygra, if we had no CWU we would have been binned a long time ago and would be on the same t&c's and pay as all the other gig economy couriers. That is fact. So why would we want rid iof them ? I understand that shareholders want rid of the cwu , and maybe you're correct that the company would be more profitable without them, but I guarantee it wouldn't be the workforce that would see any of that profit.