Member Info for Phimx

Turnthecorner:

You jest see

https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/anonymous-company-owners/aims-problems-anonymous-companies/

It's always the same routine with these pump and dump companies. Institional investors aren't involved in the raise. The usual suspects loan out the money on a pumping RNS. The rampers appear making up ridiculous claims of great wealth to come. The lender off loads as quick as he can. Why does the lender do that ? Because he knows there is no great wealth to come; if there was they wouldn't be selling. It's the punters who believe in the hype that end up paying the price.

RP2020: You write

" because they have patent on ip ..."

Incorrect, they have filed a patent application only. This not the same thing as having a patent on yout IP

QBTs first patent application was rejected

Llewelyn:

I think the only person to gain by deleting my posts is you. I have called on you to posts the lies I am supposed to have written but you haves been unable to do so.

I am very happy for other investors to read about your posts here, you don't come out of it well. But please, keep on writing.

Hexam:

For clarity and accuracy when talking about 'chip manufacturers' there could be 3 organisations loosely called chip manufacturers.

The semiconductor foundry - producing the Silicon wafers

The Company producing the mask layouts - the circuit

The customer who pays for the finished ASIC

It is now possible for anyone to produce their own 'limited ASICs from home, at small cost.

Note, using a FPGA to verify your logic and layout could allow an organisation to produce masks directly for the foundry. See the OpenMPW Shuttle Program.

Techguru91:

Ah - tomorrow tomorrow, the cry of the many AIM gamblers

I think Tom Winnifrith has spotted the same jam tomorrow companies as have all the city investment companies. Big investors don't invest here, why would that be.

Mikeyd:

What employees does QBT, the accounts say NIL.

There's only one person try to mislead here. Why are you afraid, surely you believe Gardin is going to announce great news shortly and make you rich. There's nothing I say can prevent what Gardin will say.

Are suggesting the ideas bought by Gardin are not well over a decade old now ?

2025 -2013 = 12 years

What we see on this board is the determination to remove posts which the rampers can't refute and fear. Wild ramping posts without any evidence to support are left untouched.

Sceptics of this company don't resort to this petty tactic since rampers nearly always shoot themselves in the foot.

Buildanestegg:

Shame you weren't here recently to refute the interesting points Brewhaha has been making. Perhaps you could make comment now.

BrockenbyNUOG:

As you may well know I don't tell people to buy or sell except in jest or sarcasm. I generally try and point out the absurdities in the RNS stories which suggest that all is not as it should be. People can take any information provided by anyone and make their own decisions.

Amystake"

" Patent application has been filed. The company is now presenting at various places and i expect the next step to be a commercial"

Presenting at various places .... really ! Please let us know the venues, I'm sure many would like to attend if possible.

Davesmate:

The vagueness of every aspect of QBT I.e. employees, locations and facilities, equipment, salaries, childish videos, origins of the project and so on, screams lifestyle project with technology which is outdated and unalterable.

It has nothing unique to offer the 'real' bitcoin mining industry.

GJ9576:

" As the few informed researchers have pointed out there is lots to come."

Surely you mean copy and pasters.

Garwood1:

I am sorry.

I did get mixed up with my replies.

SmartPunter:

As I've suggested earlier. I should think the really smart boys have thought of and incorporated most of the optimisations in the current hashing algorithms.

At the moment QBT has all its eggs in one basket and as Deepseek shows high tech is a volatile business. I don't think QBT has the wherewithal to make any impact at all. The fact that it is based upon a 12 year old M.Sc. thesis by Mr. Naik, no disrespect to him, says everything about QBT and Professor Gardin !

Biffofalcs:

Truly, a comprehensive reply!

Garwood:

" You do understand that Naik thesis has nothing to do with method C"

Really ? I thought optimisation 7 was very relevant. Please explain why not.

Garwood1:

You write " Seriously, grow up, you're talking to investors many of whom are intelligent and knowledgeable in the field."

I doubt that very much, nonetheless why then do you then find it difficult to apply that thought to the people who have actually created ASICs for SHA256 hashing. I'm sure they are knowledgable and intelligent in the extreme.