Member Info for Phimx

Usersteve:

Further if such a standard existed why wouldn't Gardin be publishing this reference for the 30% improvement and support his claims and give QBT some credibility.

Usersteve:

"My understanding is that the 30% improvement claim refers to how much faster Method C identifies potential winning crypto hashes when compared to an industry standard method running on the same hardware"

Right straight away you need to understand Method C is upposedly weeding out

inputs that will never produce a winning hash but it doesn't identify the winner. Those that cannot be immediately identified as losers go on to be hashed in the hope that one will be a winner.

The supposed advantage of Method C is no one else has it, so talking about industry standard is obviously nonsense.

All the small details add up to a big pile and plain old common sense tells you this is non-commrrcial and will run out of steam. Good commercial don't hang about for long, they produce and are snapped up

A other factor based upon common sense, the crypto expert didn't make a career working for Gardin, he took his dosh and went elsewhere.

Tiger179:

The bottom line is the Bitcoin mining community isn't talking about QBT, the only interviews Gardin is doing is those he pays for. He's not producing sound technical or scientific data so the big boys don't take QBT seriously nor should investors. Its a project just like Minerone and the others Gardin has been invested in.

Llewelyn: You write

" Why are you so worried then Phimx, or don’t you believe what you write? 😜"

I'm not having posts removed. I don't have a care in the world I have no money invested nor do I intend investing in this non- commercial lifestyle project.

Gaddin will make his fortune while you dreamers argue the toss.

Ignore common sense at your peril

Garwood: You write

" January 2025 “This tool, known as Method C AI Oracle (“AI Oracle”), is now performing live Bitcoin mining of current blockchain blocks, (i.e., around block count 879,000, after Method C has been “retrained” to deal with current blockchain blocks”

So current speed as of January 25."

What does that tell us about the hash rate ????

Tell me the hash rate from that statement !!

Llewelyn: You write

" 30%+ improvement, yes improvement - no flaw there 🤪, make sense, that’s rather silly."

An improvement over what exactly ? The standard hash algorithm?

Or the latest ASIC hashers.

The phrase 30% improvement is meaningless without a starting point, a reference. I'll guarantee QBT won't be telling you the reference for that 30%

The fact there has been no takers for UltraBoost in three and a half years speaks volumes.

Mickeydj will be reporting this harsh fact as false like a shot

Althought Foggy pops in to these Bitcoin shows and has his photo call, the harsh truth for investors is none of the miners has bought into the UltraBoost patent. The problem is the speed improvements ae 10 years old. To believe that the industry has not copied or produced their own speed improvements is preposterous.

When QBT claim a 30% speed increase what base line reference are they using for their claim? I very much doubt it is the latest ASIC implementations. This may explain why not a single miner or ASIC producer has bought a single UltraBoost.license.

The speed improvements are old hat and a decade old

Mickeydj:

Reporting my query on the number of licenses sold for the UltraBoost patents for ASICs.

Perhaps because not a single one sold in 3 years. Miners don't give a stuff about QBTs technology.

RNs 30 Sept 2021:

"ASIC UltraBoost reduces the Message Schedule calculations for the 3 iterations of SHA256 by approximately 20%."

How many licenses were sold to miners for the UltraBoost patent ???

Llewely: You wrote

" Yep - worried. It’s the 30% + increase in mining speed that does that"

I think you mean CLAIMED. 30% + increase.

Llewelyn:

Define 'novice' and 'expert'

It's obvious to me if I use the posters here as a yardstick then I'm not a novice. If I use Dr. Nicolas Courtois then I'm a complete buffoon

Williwonti: You wrote

"Fact, QBT held presentation of potentially 30% increased performance using Method C"

Really ? Where did you get this information from?

I'm still waiting for the Nashville Video of the QBT presentation to actually see what was shoen/said

Williwonti: You write

" Fact, it is too early to hear anything of significance from either of these events"

Perhaps - if carrier pigeon is your bag

Garwood1:

Thanks for your polite and sensible post.

I, on the other hand, can't understand how someone like you, following your experiences , doesn't understand why I try to save investors losing their life savings!

Garwood1:

The real beauty of being non-invested is there is no stress or pressure no manic desire to lie or invent. I don't give two hoots if the share goes up or down. I'm interested in the eventual outcome as I can verify by my long term postings on INSP, since about 2016. INSP is about to fade from AIM after claiminging in many RNS,rubber stamped by the NOMAD, of awesome world class technology development. After congratulating his hard working teams several times, the company has shelved their "boundless potential" WHR system because one (1) employee left the company and so another £70 millions of British publics money has vanished into the bottomless pit that is AIM.

22 Feb 2021: CLEAR LEISURE LTD

" ... Proceeds from the placing will go towards entry into cloud mining contracts with existing mining pool operators, setting up a new bitcoin mining operation in Italy, and building one or more replicas of Clear Leisure's cryptocurrency infrastructure in Serbia."

I wonder how that panned out ? Yes you guessed !

Well the silence from Nashville attendees regarding says it all. They didn't pour out the doors with the name of Gardjn or QBT on their lips. It's as if those attending had never heard of QBT.

Perhaps Foggy was on the doors as they left and each one had to sign a NDA.

Surely someone of influence had something to report about the game changing QBT technology ???