Member Info for Phimx

Llwelyn:

Lies eh, care to say what my lies were

Plutuq:

Moderators aren't checking, that's how Mickeydj gets away with his reporting.

Obviously they are snowed under with posts to check.

Mickeydj:

In black and white, like this statement from RNS 2 June 2021

"Furthermore, already existing and imminent optimisations are expected to be made available for mining on commercial cores within the next three months, on FPGA chips within the next six months and ultimately on ASIC chips by the second half 2022."

We are now in 2025 and not an ASIC chip to be seen, all just wishful thinking by Foggy. He appears to have no concept of time scales or project planning which is very strange since he is surrounded by world class developers we are told.

I'm sure that drivel impressed the punters and most of them are still here waiting for delivery. Hunker down its going to be a long time coming. No one wants what QBT have it's passed its sell be date by a decade or more

Mickeydj: You wrote

" Ignore the signs if you wish, but they are there in black and white

That is blatantly false and missleading. Post reported.

It is obviously not misleading because you are afraid of the truth and want to hide these posts

Garwool1: You write

"But, on every post you have got strong sell. That’s not “trying to save investors losing their life savings"

Not sure I following your logic there should I be asking them to buy?

Sell is my opinion. I don't believe QBT will ever be a disruptive player in the Bitcoin world. I don't believe they will ever have any technology to sell commercially to miners or ASIC producers. The signs are there, you choose to ignore them, you are blinded by the thoughts of great wealth. Explain where the money went to your family in a couple of years.

Ignore the signs if you wish, but they are there in black and white

Harrun: You wrote

" News is imminent"

But reality is different

RNS 2 June 2021

" Furthermore, already existing and imminent optimisations are expected to be made available for mining on commercial cores within the next three months, on FPGA chips within the next six months and ultimately on ASIC chips by the

second half 2022."

He's certainly striking it out.

What happened to my post to beekeeper ?

Is he another post remover ?

Come to think of it where is Mickeydj? Maybe someone has had him removed.

Usersteve:

Look through my post its not too long ago you'll find links there unless Mickeydj had the posts removed. Perhaps 3 or 4 weeks ago ... roughly

Llewelyn: You write

" Zzzz..........here we go, strap in, Phimx will now fud away about decades old patents, you have been warned."

The old patent is what the present technology is based upon and obviously plays an important part in the credibility of QBT now.

Mock away I don't think you're adding to your credibility

Llewelyn: You write

" Underarm bowling from intern Steve to Phimx now..........let's fud with irrelevant patent fud, I'm expecting better👍"

Is this the only input you can provide to a discussion?

Usersteve:

" Is there any detail reason for the patent rejection?"

The Patent office rejected it for standard reasons but there was objections by an anonymous third part claiming the work by Naik had been published publicly.

A long standing maxim is Patent or publish either no one can lay claim to the IP and profit from it I.e. anyone is able to profit.

I did query that fact because the work by Naik, his M.Sc. thesis was published in

2014. The crypto/ASIC industry has had a decade to pick over the thesis.

RRS 2 June 2021:

..." the Company has entered into a one-year service agreement with a UK based international cryptography expert whose specialism is cryptocurrency mining blockchain optimisations."

This expert is Rahul Naik who appears on the Patent application as inventor

Communication - the work of the devil !

Usersteve:

The crypto expert I refer to is Rahul Naik. He is the inventor on the 2021 patent application which has been rejected.

Wow polite discussion - I don't believe it

Notready1:

It helps if you address to whom you ate replying to

Usersteve:

The quantum computer work has no bearing on method C which is supposedly an Oracle project running on, eventually, an ASIC.

The quantum project is software running on a still to be developed in the distant future a quantum computer

Notready1:

OK explain what's not true

Naik's original work used the standard SHA256 has algorithm as his baseline for his improvement figures