Member Info for Phimx

RNS 8 Jan 2015
Inspirit Energy (LSE AIM: INSP) announces that it has committed to the development and production of a new 2 kilowatt ("kW") electrical output version of the Inspirit mCHP boiler-generator for the domestic market to complement the larger 3 kW electrical output version currently being

COMMITTED. my a*** anyone heard of this since ?

My post 8 March

The Inpirit web site continues to display misleading information.

" monitor the progress
Follow Inspirit Energy’s progress with field trial, launch and deployment of its first and subsequent products, based on its Stirling engine platform and unique intellectual property"

Unique IP ?
Progress ?
Field trial ?
Deployments ?
First product ?
Subsequent products ?

Any additional heat has to be applied EFFECTIVELY to the helium in the Stirling. The statements don't tell by how much the Stirling is improved nor if it sustainable for a production device. These factors take a lot of assesment.

Are you trying to imply the Stirling output power and efficiency has increased by 26% ?

That is a step into the unknown based upon what is written. The effects of pumping a lot more heat into the Stirling and producing more power will have long term consequences

READ WHAT IS SAID, NOT WHAT YOU WANT IT TO SAY

It DOES NOT say the Stirling output is increased by 26% and even if it did, the Inspirit Stirling would still produce an insufficien output to improve the D13 range efficiency significantly

Where does it say 26% efficiency in the RNS ???

Oldblue: you babble on about active shorters yet if you look above, LSE reports there are NO open short positions

Please explain how you obtain your false information !

Sometime soon this share price will go below 0.05p it's inevitable after 1 Billion shares have been placed. The next news will be a long time coming.

Of course a patent for the wonderful Helix Accelerator could change my mind but I'm betting that won't happen.

Oldblue: who pointed out I am actively shorting this stock ? Another question you'll not answer and it is a lie.

You write drivel but can't back it up with any substance. That's typical of dreamers and tampers, they live in a world of desperate hope and ignore simple common sense and fact. Destined to lose money hand over fist.

Oldblue: beware of what they write. Well I'm writing

.... How does a 10.3 HP In-spirit Stirling engine improve a Volvo D13 375 HP engine by 20% ????

10.3/375 = 2.7%

Tell me how that works, any school kid knows that is impossible.

To my knowledge, there is no evidence Volvo are involved in this project. Volvo gave In-spirit a letter of support to In-spirit's PROPOSAL, this gives some credence to the idea that In-spirit approached Volvo. What the LoS actually says is hidden from shareholders. What is certain, from John Gunn's own words, is a trial of the WHR system is not certain to be tested in a Volvo engine, some support eh?

What is also fact is In-spirit were unable to demonstrate a working device after 10 years of development and had to impress Volvo ! with a model.

Over the last 6 years In-spirit have produced nothing vague deceptive statements that have been proven to be worthless, at least to investors. John Gunn on the other hand has done very well.

You pay your money and take your chance. A sensible person would do some reading and weigh up the promises in the RNS statements and look at the reality!

For an interesting comparison Google coolenergy.com and read about their Thermoheart 25 kWe Stirling engine.

EarlofAim: Truly you are a visionary. I'd like to point out that you and your kind ARE the backers. Over the last 10 years much money has been raised on potential, promises, discussions, Imminent trials, builds, design for manufacture BUT not a single contract to achieve anything has been signed. For those millions you and your kind have donated not a single thing has passed through the non existent factory gates.
The word POTENTIAL has made John Gunn a wealthy man but you ....

Why use argument, logic or truths when insults are so easy to throw around.

EarlofAim: you are about 6 months behind the curve, if you care to read my previous posts, I stated that a Stirling could be of use in a marine application.
But large cargo ships, while producing a lot of waste heat, also burn the dregs of the oil industry i.e. very cheap fuel. Heaven knows what HP their engines pump out but producing another 10.3 HP isn't going to send the shipping industry wild. The Stirling is heavy and expensive, that's why it isn't mainstream. To seriously improve big HP engine efficiency you need a lot more output from the Stirling. If you want to improve the lowest power output D13 by say 10% then you need a Stirling that will produce 37.5 HP simple. So In-spirit's Stirling has improve hugely- simple yes.

Oldblue: I know you find percentages difficult, perhaps you could get your brother's kids to explain!

Oldblue: The punters still waiting to for you to explain how a 10.3 HP Stirling from INSP improve a 375 HP Volvo D13 by 20% .... Magic is not allowed.

I make that less than 3% FAR less than 6.7% achieved by the Rankine.

Tell what kind of maths you use such that 6.7% is less than 2.7%

I think institutional investors are well aware of what this and many other AIM companies. The shares being moved around will end up In the hands of naive punters desperately trying to hit the big one. How many ii are holding INSP ?

EarlofAim: Volvo aren't going to buy 350 kg expensive Stirling so slap on the side of a D13 to improve its efficiency by 2.7% when a theoretical paper has shown a potential gaming of 6.7%.
Feel free to fill your boots but history (RNS) tells us this company produce nothing but hot air

Go for it son