RE: Summary of US court cases18 Jul 2023 07:19
Other issue is that if FRR are found in default and/or agree on receiver with YA, what's the chances of a return on this by that route. Am I right in thinking that the appointed receiver is duty bound to get the best price for whatever remains of the company in all or in different parts sold off? So in our case the tail end of the licence agreement, some wells & equipment on site but most importantly the oil & gas data, it's location, etc. After all no point in YA bothering to go after FRR and have a receiver (eventually) appointment unless it thinks it can get at least somewhere near the $2 million it is owed or even near $1 million, half a million, etc. So it must have some idea that one way or another it can extract the money from FRR otherwise a pointless action on its behalf bothering pursuing the case.
So if for argument sake YA believe they can reclaim some money towards its $2 million if not the whole sum, then odds are a buyer is going to be willing to pay a fair bit for FRR. While not anywhere near the money if we had a licence extension then still quite a lot mainly based on the data and the opportunity to then get a license extension from the GG. So my guess is potentially enough for us investors to see our money returned with some profit perhaps??? Could this end up our way out of this mess, perhaps the only way with the GG unwilling to grant a licence extension to FRR given its history with FRR if that is the case.