RE: OMF v SN, ZM - Judge terminates case15 Apr 2023 11:32
Guessing an investor is on board if money to pay off Hope/OMF, either that or Hope has agreed to a smaller settlement from SN/ZM. Though I can't see Hope wanting to forgo in full his loan repayments. That said I think it was noticed a while back that OMF may not have been doing so well on its other investments so possibly Hope's back was to the wall and had to just settle to get something out of FRR to avoid it all going sour.
At the moment I'm guessing that possibly an investor might have been brought on board possibly to sort things out, but on that front we haven't heard of any alteration in terms of shareholding unless it's all just in contract form deal at the moment. Quite possibly I guess could alongside it all be a deal between FRR and the GOGC to extend FRR's licence agreement pending guaranteed investment to develop the field, etc. The GG will likely be wishing the field to be developed as its own share, tax money & jobs all ride on it.
So quite possibly I'm thinking that possibly a lot of work may have given on over the past year or so. I think FRR may have communicated such over a year ago in one of the rare cases of messages we received, but that again little could be said. I for one came to doubt anything was happening as nothing seemed to be happening on the surface at least. Possibly though behind closed doors maybe goings on really were taking place. Maybe it was a case that the whole lot had to be agreed before it could commence, the main court cases, the investment agreement and the licence extension. Would make sense I would have thought. So perhaps possibly we might hear in due course on the investment & license agreement? All speculation on my part but I think possibly quite feasible.
My only hope now going forward is that there is relatively good news. That we're not going to be blind sided by any news that may come out by anything unexpected. I think with any investment we always new that they would almost certainly be wanting a large stake in the company and existing shareholding would consequently be diluted. That said the money input and the wealth of the field would offset that in terms of the shares/company being more valuable. I don't necessarily think a buyout at this stage as I think likely the investment was needed upfront to sort out the court cases and possibly licence agreement. Down the line though who knows.