Member Info for Phil164

In the current circumstances I think what is proposed is reasonable, also why do it for a year or so of money if you are not more confident of getting an farm in of some sort away, which they must be now. Equally on the other side of the coin if you are a company discussing a farm in, why would you sign on the dotted line now when the company is going to go bankrupt and you can pick it at up for nothing, this demonstrates to a partner the board are still in the game and serious to stay so. I still think, after the last 10 days, the Falklands are in play more than for a long time. Just my opinion, I may be wrong.

Hi MrBond, hope you are well, all I can say is if the Board are incapable of generating interest now then they never will....we will see very soon.

Thete are a few of us who have been here a good few years, whether that makes us wiser, well speaking only of me personally Im not sure about that ...lol

.....although that said, last two years have both been as late as they have ever been, on 14th April.

Well, historically results are the end of the 1st week or early in the 2nd week of April....not too much longer to wait.

Tincan, over a decade ago I am pretty sure there was briefly a market rumour that shell were going to bid for border, but once again you have to look to see what operations they have in Argentina, that is what stops many companies getting involved.

It would be nice to think that stepptoe, but we know how the argentinians treated Repsol.

Bp have previously said years ago they would not get involved in the FIs, due to operations in Argentina.

There are still no guarantees, we all know that, but the situation is different to what it was even a week ago.

Hi Anth, i dont have to put up with POC's rubbish, I blocked him a short while after he turned up here, a month or more ago, just cutting and pasting old info, as though we all hadnt read it 100 times, pointless, he clearly has nothing better to do.

Its not that I am unsympathetic to that argument Rookie, I think the west trying to pull Ukraine into its sphere of influence, started by the EU a decade ago, was a mistake. It doesnt change my view though that any leader of a nuclear power who thinks he can threaten a nuclear war has completely lost the plot, and then there is his aim to denazify Ukraine, a country led by a Jewish leader, completely bizarre, he is displaying a mental imbalance in my view which should worry us all.

Todays down day changes nothing, I repeat the events of the last 24 hours have made the development of Falklands oil and gas far more likely not less, yes we may need to ride out the next few days, just hold your nerve. But always remember as with almost all shares their are no guarantees, this remains a high risk reward play.

People should not forget what is happening makes the FI development a lot more likely not less.

I agree Rookie, no harm done.

I think MMs will use today as an opportunity to trigger stop losses and gather shares.

I would certainly hold the EU far more responsible for this than NATO.

....and of course Norway which had slipped my mind.

Surround is a strange word to use, other than the relatively small borders of the baltic states where else do nato forces sit on Russia's border? As for the story I tend to get much of my information from listening to committee proceedings, not the media.

Well its started, the whole world can now hold its breath thanks to one total fruit loop.

We have had rises before, but maybe not quite like this....lets see what tomorrow brings.