Member Info for Pettycash

So... All those question Term had have just been fobbed off with personal slatings. My entire point about the small-mindset of shareholders has been played out...and again and again...was the biggest in Oxus Gold when I took off 1,000 postings as pretty much the only contrarian to the 1000% club..and that went t*ts up. Sheep. AZ, Rudey, et al...I don't know what most of you come of share boards, as you're certainly not here to disseminate information and help others...and have robust arguments and neutral debates. In fact, negative posts hold far more weight in my eyes than positive ones as they allow (if you open you eyes to them) other perspectives than the usual insular emotional thinking. most folk don't like contrarian or believing they may be wrong, as this tends to reveal weaknesses in self. Most people like to be part of a crowd an follow blindly, either due to immature nature , youth, self confidence, or lack of intellignce - and most on share boards are certainly of below average intellect-but would they see it?? Never. Part of lacking intelligence is having to follow a crowd , or trusting your own views in a dogmatically held way So..INFORMATION please AZ...let's hear the reasons you invested after "weeks of research", and others, why don;t you stop hurling insults at Term. It says more about you than him. Now , can any of you resist responding to this without the need for insults. Respond with data and how you see UJO playing out this year if you can.. Now, there's a challenge...actually using a message board

and a mistake made by goldie share lovers and oilies alike is wrongly conflating what's in the ground with recoverable asset value. If you can't get it out - and there's now ample evidence that the planners aren't playing by fair rules, then it's worthless.. And no matter how much research you do, you can't account for the local mindset of shhep-following planners. I had a gamble here on HW and Wressle, but it didn't pay off, and looking at recent planning decisions, it seems they're running scared. So how do your weeks of research get around that very basic truth Alexandrzarro? I'm not having a go; I@m curious as to your thinking

Term..also time for you to stump up your info as you see it. Alexander's not going to, because he cant.

..will be AlexandersPlaceZantonoff's textual articulation of his weeks of amazing research.. and Term's calculation of how many shares the directors have bought. Or is it going to be more tit-for-tat rubbish. Two people have made statemnets: Term has said the Directors have bought peanuts, Alexander'sZamora, has boasted weeks of research So over to you two...the facts please gentlemen, as you see them.

I now fear that, because Term and my posts have occurred within a small timeframe, we'll be accused of being a team, the same person, or evil derampers.. I'm with him/ her on this. I HATE the mantra of share herdies who cliam mounds of research and have precious attachments to their divine knowledge...when usually they can't read a chart, make loads of losses,and are not clued up. and...good timing by Term...I totally agree with him/ her.. the board is for sharing and makiing your arguments...not spitting the dummy out. Let's hear the case then Allessandrowahtdomecallit... I have about �2K of these, and have had 'em for ages...I think Term's questions and stance are totally legitimate..so, try to fight ad hominem Alexandersplacewhatdoyoumecall it, and let's hear your "weeks" of mighty research and why things are massively rosy for UJO.. As far as I can see, there is a significant cashburn, AND with everything being in the hands of numpty planners, this, and most of the UK land=based companies, are well wobbly. There is no meta-government direction to it.

Loving it...! again, typical shareboard conflab.. New poster A takes a negative stance, which probably objectively seems more realistic than 'supporters' of the share. Defensive poster B (who sees the company as being 'his' property and obviously attached to it), plays the player, not the ball in typical immature AIM fare, and boats "weeks of reasearch" so "I am not going to give YOU the answers!" You aren't giving HIM the answers. First, you don't have the answers, as the share price is answering that, and secondly, it's not HIM who is your audience.. Your audience is the truth, or education, or learning - letting others into your knowledge. That's the idea. Geddit?

nm

These websites are full of people who can't stand an attempt at being objective..I think intelligence long left share dealing when it became democratised to the 90% herdy masses of gamblers. When a poster (Westle, in this case) dares to upset the applecart by simply articulating what is a simple patent truth - that this is/ has been painful...and probably will continue to be, as he rightly states) , then you get the typically cliched defensive, passive aggressive stance of a numpty (Mixster in this case) imploring the investor to "sell", as all portents must be rosy and glittering according to the Herdy rule book. Say what you think westle, and you don't have to defend your feelings, (as you obviously felt).. And my "Advise" to you Mix, is to learn the difference between a noun and a verb...that's good "Advice"

Cheers John

Never had a company reverse takeover before...I trade/Invest through Interactive Investor...not heard a sniff over there.. Do we all wake up on May 3 or May 10, and suddenly see the Tag that previously stated Onz suddenly change to N4 Pharma automatically?

Absolutely Graphite. But keep it up laddie..scribbling away for hours and hours in the vain effort to become graphene...One can aspire, but rarely reaches..

Calm down Rachels dad! All looks to be working out well here, not withstanding a shocking lack of comms from GB... but I've heard it SO many times before what a share "should" be .."Kerching" etc etc.. You may find it goes to 10p, then there's a ass sell-off as peeps in the know probably have more idea of time frames for patents etc.. They may have a few things up their sleeves to keep it projecting upwards ( and maybe patents/trials will come along in a timely manner and make this a resounding success story. Conversely, wouldn't be surprised to see an initial flutter, no doubt with attendant premature orgasom on here, followed by a swift decline for a fundraiser. At the mo, pleasantly surprised and pleased to see it back under the guidance of te man with its interests tryly at heart.

"Bagging".."10p party"...etc etc etc.. usually ends in poverty for the overkeen masses However, maybe this will do well.. Futura have a similar fast-acting erectile med on the market...Although N4 certainly have many patents going in...but what's the timeframe/ dilution ratio going to be? There's been speculation elsewhere that there hasn't been the initial appetite for these new shares as some would expect. If this starts as a crica £1.5 - £2m initial fundraised listing, this will undoubtedly be hungry for more and more cash..as start-up Pharma's inevitably are. Good points,..NT's pretty good record, ambition, patents, downsides : Time, R&D gobbles money like a monster..alternative products. IMO could go either way...might spike at first, pull back...spike on a bit of progress news, with attendant subsequent fundraiser to dilute ala AIM. All depends how far down the line they've got with some of their work..and how much cash they need in next year.

I think I'm going to install you as my homepage calendar

This deal could be excellent (long-term) or could be bad - nothing has really changed as far as N4 goes. This is all about timescales, whether they can monetize Patents and the realise potential of the reformulated 'viagra'. Loans and dilutions will continue as long as N4 gobbles away; so it's a matter of getting on the ride at the rtght stop. Some of us have probably got on way too early, but it may come good..or maybe the ride never stops, as the value of patents are never trialed successfully. This could be very big, or a money pit. That part is all about faith in NT and his prowess. The dilution, and large placing could have minimal effect or be detrimental depending on both take-up and pricing at the time. It may be oversubscribed - and that would be a true indicator of unleashed potential, or we may get hit, with a huge dilution. My point about what's transpired is the unwelcome shock of having (or some people on here) up to £50K taken away for at least 6 months..which could have gone elsewhere or accrued interest or may have been needed. There has been minimal communication from G Burnell, and little forward indicators...But I know he's your best mate now, herdies. No wonder NT told me he "likes how he operates"! They get sustained funding and wages, and a massive investment. This is great for N4..maybe it'll also be great for us - or maybe not -but whichever way, I do NOT like how Burnell operates.

I predict some of you will be back at Gavin's throat at the next negitive turn...then back t'other way again...then back...then.. Vacillations Anonymous! It;s like you'e had it taken away, been given a small proportion back - and you're beggingly happy for it..hoho! Weak minds. N4 may come good...or it may not... who knows...but I certainly know what it feels like to be f*cked up the butt! Ouch - this is it! haha...and some you LOVE it!

csnfan - et al... Got to laugh at some of these posts, I really have.. You say that N4 was going to be a 2 to 3 year play ,a dnwe all knew this - so WHY did you invest SO early for obvious dilution?? These Bios are always cash hungry - and this one will no doubt need even further cash down the line.. Personally, I'll hold my hands up and say I had too much spare cash hanging around, I saw the N4 potential, without thinking through the term-time needed for development and the fear of missing out agaiun became the prime mover for me.. to my chagrin...My own fault...Win some lose some.. But for all those saying they knew N4 was like this and would take 2 more years - well why the hell did you buy so early?? If you knew this, and you bought then you really like throwing money down the drain.

hahaha...you are a JOKER Graphite!!!! If you gave someone £10K and they gave you back £3K would you say "Thank you, I am SO pleased!" Great deal! haha Jokerrrrrrr!! Yes, I'm happy we're coming back, but at a big price. Burnell,s still the winner, matey

Gavin's suddenly a genius!...so why wasn;t the deal formulated in the months leading to Suspension?...and did you forget he held you on a wire for 3 months? ... let's see what the deal translates to, if it passes the tests

3 - 1 dilution what i predicted, IF we came back at all... So what do we end up with..? I'll have a closer look now at new Market Cap