Member Info for Peterashbeck

Alan 2017

19th Jan 2019 "You can’t blame Vonk for the missed deadlines"

11th May 2019 "not sure how many times I had to clarify this...but here goes one more time....Turn on the Taps is a standard oilfield expression for a well that has already been drilled... So Mr Vonk was quite correct in what he said. "

And what about your deramping conversation with your fellow AAAG member gkb47?

Alan, you and gkb47 spent quite a lot of time discussing how you believed that Rupert was in league with the board to take the company private. The chain of your posts makes very interesting reading:

On 20/04/2020 gkb47 first mentioned this idea: "Interesting thing is that if Knowe Properties do convert then in concert with JTP and maybe Rupert or JDA they would be over 30% and could then launch a takeover."

You then further elaborated later.

At 09:59 on 14/07/2020 Alan2017 posted: "gkb47 - what is Knowes current share %?"

At 10:12 on 14/07/2020 gkb47 replied: "Alan 10.02% - It would go to about 27% if they fully convert that loan, less % though if there are more placings along the way. It means that with the % holdings of JTP and JDA then they would have over 30%. I have often wondered what the end game was here."

At 10:12 on 14/07/2020 Alan2012 said: "gkb47 - Don't forget Ruperts slice of the pie either. Didn't Clanwilliam take an oil rig company private when he was Chairman?"

At 10:12 on 14/07/2020 gkb47 replied "Alan - you know very well he did and you know we know it too. I always thought it odd that one of the first things LL did was to bring him in, I mean look at his track record?"

Another example of you and the AAAG trying to mislead the board with erroneous information and YET ANOTHER example of you getting it wrong Alan.

Alan every opinion you have expressed on Angus has turned out to be wrong - from when you were ramping it at 30p+ to when you were defending Paul Vonk's disgusting "turn the taps on" comments to when you were suggesting that Rupert Labrum was colluding with the board to take the company private.

You have no credibility left. I'm afraid and nor do your AAAG buddies. Stick to making tea.

gkb47 - I think that you should post your own question on the Angus site. The reason you don't is because you are not interested in the answer, you simply want to slate the company.

As I was looking through the comments of some of the AAAG derampers here I found a lovely little comment from Yorkshire Life about Rupert Labrum:

"Bear in mind that there's nothing stopping "Rupert Labrum"... loan out Anguish Energy shares to short.... Rupert is well within his rights to make money this way at private investors expense - and as a former trader... will take EACH and EVERY opportunity to do so IMHO ;-)" - this was posted on 19th December 2019

It would seem that it was the AAAG who originally identified Rupert as a trader and have conveniently forgotten about this and are trying to change their message to play him as some kind of cornerstone investor. Unfortunately for them all of their posts are archived and they are exposed by their own comments!

Apologies to Ratsass for the "impertinence" of pointing out this inconvenient truth.

Actually as I look back on previous posts it seems like Rupert was previously the poster boy for the AAAG accusing the Angus board of trying to take Angus private.

Look at this quote from tea-boy Alan exactly one month ago today:

"gkb47 - Don't forget Ruperts slice of the pie either. Didn't Clanwilliam take an oil rig company private when he was Chairman?" (14th July 2020 - look it up in his history)

So from the AAAG's point of view Trader Rupert was previously part of a diabolical plan to take Angus private and now he was a very serious investor whose sale is bad for the company and not simply a profitable trade for him.

Make up your minds lads as you are making yourself look rather stupid here and meanwhile the share price not only comfortably absorbs Rupert's trade but it also keeps on going up.

There is no way fair value in this has been reached yet. This is just the beginning.

Agreed Sageman - if you go back and look at Lucan's recent interviews he even refers to Brockham as a duster and it and Lydsey as "legacy assets". The focus of this company is solely on Saltfleetby and Balcombe and shareholders old and new would do well to remember this.

Vonk (and his supporters) screwed up Brockham and Lydsey. Lucan is making a massive success of Saltfleetby. Balcombe is just a nice exploration gamble with no downside (the oil is definitely there, it is just how much flows).

Those who pretend that any value in Angus comes from Brockham or Lydsey are simply idiots or those who cannot let go of Vonk's dream. They are the past Saltfleetby is the future - as the Shell deal is showing us.

Alan was a massive ramper of this share a couple of years ago and is now a member of the Anti-Angus-Action-Group (AAAG) who are deliberately trying to undermine the company. Just a couple of weeks ago he was saying that Saltfleetby was a failure and would never make money yet here we are with a Shell offtake agreement.

Alan was a big Paul Vonk supporter and memorably said:

"Turn on the Taps is a standard oilfield expression for a well that has already been drilled and therefore you don't need to build in the financial / time factor of drilling the well. So Mr Vonk was quite correct in what he said. " (check his history 11th May 2019).

Alan portrays himself as an oil industry expert yet seems to get most of his comments relating to Angus very very wrong. Very interestingly, when they were asked about him directly Angus said about him is that he shows "some real knowledge interspersed with some very real gaps in their technical understanding".

I think that they are being kind and his only knowledge of the oil industry is how those who did the work take their tea.

Milk no sugar please Alan and don't screw it up this time.

I loved Brokerman Daniel's post today: https://twitter.com/BrokermanDaniel/status/1293533654019383296

I am no fan of BMD but at least he admits when a company releases REALLY GOOD NEWS.

short term trading. Buy into a share and then get out for a small quick profit. It doesn't have to be held for a day and in fact is usually held for a much shorter period.

Really pleased to see this pass 300p today. The recovery continues.

Alan will never admit that he is not an Angus holder or that he is a member of the AAAG.

But yes you are right, he was one of the really big rampers of this share back in the day. The trouble is he now hates the company so much that he refuses to see anything with rational eyes.

However, it seems like the global supermajor shell disagrees with his self-proclaimed "expert" opinion. Not surprising really since 90% of the analysis he posts is wrong.

Angus under Lucan is now delivering on their promises. The AAAG are proved to be out and out liars and things are only going upwards from here.

It's not even worth trading Lloyds at the moment IMO.

17th September at the earliest.

It is really nice to see the gradual recovery coming in here and if you look at the chart from July 15th it shows a lovely upwards movement. The core of the business is very healthy (it was just truly awful PR) and so we can expect a continued recovery over the next few months.

Looking foard to it breaking 300p in the near future. GLA.

Wow - already backing down Rastuss.

First 1.5p
Then close over 1.5p
Now £50,000 shares must change hands.

Surely the closing/opening price has to be enough?

I have to be honest and say that I do not think that the Isle of Wight has any chance of happening now or ever. I always thought that it was more of a "land-grab" purchase to help boost the price of the stock anyway and I think that the pivot towards Turkey just proves that I was right.

You know my views on the Weald - it is a dead duck. If it was no then SS would not have made the Turkey move.

Loxley is a definite goer though if planning can be sorted.

I thought that you told us earlier that you were a genuine "non-investor" in angus Ratsuss?

Whether you are in or out - I think that you should start doing your own research though. As you must have seen recently some of the posts on here from the self proclaimed oil expert are so error ridden that they should never be relied on by any genuine investors. I hear he makes a great cup of tea though.

In all seriousness, like I said earlier, UKOG had to do something after the Weald has turned out to be impossible to produce from in commercial quantities. This is not anyone's fault, it is oil exploration and nobody guaranteed us that there was going to be oil when we invested we all took a risk.

As some of you probably know, I am no fan of SS at all. I think that his salary is extortionate (even if he had been successful) and to take this salary with the results he has delivered is a kick in the teeth to all shareholders. I think that he should be replaced sooner rather than later and that he has not delivered one iota of real value to shareholders in his tenure.

That said, this diversification into Turkey is not a bad idea. It is back to exploration and if they have done their DD well and they get a little bit lucky (all successful drills require an element of luck) then it could indeed restore the company's fortunes.

Getting into Turkey is certainty better than doing noting. The great Weald experiment is over. It failed.

GLA.

Sorry, that was a joke that I only realised was not funny after I posted it.