Member Info for Peterashbeck

I reckon that the weekend is when we will see some online booking start.

Is there an SS worship club? I wonder how many members it has? Himself and his mother maybe, but I can't think that it will stretch much further than that will it?

gkb47, you may not be a lawyer but are you part of the anti-angus action group?

I am having something of a disagreement with Alan2017. He claimed in his post on the 20th June that Geoge Lucan was wrong when he said that “one of the decisions I took was to diversify slightly away from exploration and into production “.

I have pointed out that the big part of Angus was always exploration aside from very small-scale production. I have even ringed the sections on page 5 of the IPO INVESTOR PRESENTATION NOVEMBER 2016 document where it says in big letters “EXPLORATION” and the than Angus will “Exploare Kimmeridge Limestones at Brockham”.

Sadly however, Alan does not seem to be able to see the words “EXPLORATION” and “EXPLORE” on this page. So just to check I am not going mad would you mind letting me know if you can see them on the following link: https://ibb.co/HqhtLX1

Am I blind and making up that Angus were originally heavily involved in exploration of the Kimmeridge or is Alan blind and making up that they were not…

Two options for you to vote on:

1) Yes, page 5 of the IPO document says that Angus intend to explore the Kimmeridge at Brockham

2) No, page 5 of the IPO document does not say that Angus intend to explore the Kimmeridge at Brockham

For those who want to check on the official document itself, it can be seen at this link in page 5: http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Angus-Energy-IPO-Investor-Presentation.pdf

Alan, you're having a mare here son.

On page 5 of the IPO document it says that Angus intend to EXPLORE the Kimmeridge Limestone at Brockham. It is in a section entitled "EXPLORATION". Exploration was always a huge part of the Angus story. The advantage that they had was the production license was already in palce (again as it said on page 5)

I have even ringed the bit that shows you Angus we exploring for you here: https://ibb.co/HqhtLX1

Alan, Paul Vonk was the man who (in an interview) made the statement about Brockham Production of "We just need to turn the taps on". You know, the statement that so misled investors back in the day.

You appear to be claiming that because you say there was no exploration involved that there was no exploration involved. However, the IPO presentation says very different: https://ibb.co/HqhtLX1

By the way, you never answered the question:

ARE YOU PART OF THE ORGAINSED ANTI_ANGUS ACTION GROUP?

A simple yes no answer will do...

Sorry Alan, you are wrong (AGAIN) as you often are.

If you go to slide 5 in the presentation you will see that it clearly says Exploration and it then redfers to "Explore Kimmeridge Limestones at Brockham"

If you would like to see the page the link is here: https://ibb.co/HqhtLX1

Or for the whole document see here: http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Angus-Energy-IPO-Investor-Presentation.pdf

Just because you say that black is white Alan it does not make it so. It seems like you have an ulterior motive to make the company look as bad as possible...

You are very fond of asking questions Alan so let's see you answer this one:

ARE YOU PART OF THE ORGAINSED ANTI_ANGUS ACTION GROUP?

A simple yes no answer will do...

Hi Alan,

I was just looking through the analysis of George Lucan's interview that you did the other day. On a superficial glance it seemed to be a reasonable bit of work but as I actually watched the video and followed your links I saw that there were a number of errors in it where you had left out key factors that meant that your conclusions were flat out wrong.

The first of theses was the first point:

-----------------------------------------------------------------
@1min 11secs - GL: “one of the decisions I took was to diversify slightly away from exploration and into production and last year we acquired a formerly producing gas asset, which was once the largest onshore UK gas field and that had been stranded.” Once again Lucan is WRONG, as Angus have been promoted from Day 1 as not being an Exploration company, but a Producer / Development Company, hence the title of the above presentation

“Proven UK Operator, Producer and Developer
IPO INVESTOR PRESENTATION NOVEMBER 2016”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

However if, instead of just looking at the title of the presentation you actually bothered to read it you would see that on page 5 there is a big section entitled “Exploration” where it says explicitly that the company’s intention is to “EXPOLORE Kimmeridge Limestones at Brockham”.

Would you like to comment on the fact that it is not George Lucan who was wrong but rather yourself. The Developer in the title clearly refers to the exploration that they refer to on page 5.

Shoddy analysis Alan. Do you have much prior experience in the O&G industry?

Pippa-Peaches does seem to be a rather bizarre character.

Too good to be true some might say...

Derampers all over the place on LSE at the moment. At least this guy is just working on his own!

Let me delve back through my old notes and see if I can find anything. I will be back if I can.

You are quite correct, it was very scary and very dangerous for new investors too. Someone innocent like poor Michael for instance could have been entirely misled.

Fortunately, this board is a much more civilised place nowadays. However, I do notice that even the very talk of such terrible behaviour has scared our poor innocent new investor Michael. He seems to have deleted all of his posts and permanently removed himself from the board.

New investors should really learn to watch the interviews and listen to the board members rather than believe self-ordained "oil experts" on these forums. These people inevitably have their own agendas.

Long term this will go up. But if you want to make quick money then you are going to have to be equally quick with your trading fingers.

Thank heavens for that. I would hate to think that an innocent new investor such as Michael Goodwill was connected to, or was being misled by that notorious ramper WolfOfTheWoods who recall in 2018 predicted "£1 this year and £5 in 5 years" and I also believe had form for organising private Twitter groups with his cohorts before they came and posted en mass on here.

It's a good job nothing like that is happening on this board nowadays.

I have just watched the George Lucan interview with LSE. He comes across as a very genuine bloke who is working his hardest to turn the company around and has a very sensible paln to do this.

He has addressed almost all of the issues raised by the so-called oil experts on this board and made them look pretty stupid with their poorly worked out GCSE calculations.

At this price and with a 6 month turnaround this is a great investment regardless of what the "Anti-Angus Action Group" suggest. Their agenda is becoming ever more nakedly revealed.

What unpleasant allegations?
What has Alan been accused of doing?

But I agree, I think that the recovery starts tomorrow. The newsflow has certainly been less bleak today.

I agree. I closed my shorts on this yesterday but did not buy back in today. Am thinking of getting back in first thing tomorrow so hoping for a slow start.

Are you talking physical gold of tradeable gold.

I know a number of gold bugs who actually sleep on top of their stash!

Gold going up at a great rate just now.