Member Info for Peterashbeck

HeadInTheSand - Nah, judging by the quality of your posts, your head is definitely stuck somewhere significantly more intimate.

Still, it saves money on a proctologist I guess.

gkb can't let it go. he and his little AAAG gang are still going to sue the company and recover all of their investors losses and are fully funded to do so - you know, like they promised us all over a year ago.

None of them have a clue what they are talking about - remember gkb's claim that Rupert Labrum was in league with JTP and Know properties to take Angus private? This is why their "absolutely 100% guaranteed winning case" has got absolutely nowhere.

Like I said back in July last year:

"The lawyers love it when these naïve bumpkins arrive. I've seen it dozens of times. They come in with their made-up ideas of how they have been robbed and of course the lawyers tell them that they have such a great case that they are going to do the job on a no-win-no-fee basis. But this is just salesmanship. Fast forward a month or two and the same lawyers that promised that the case was cast-iron and wouldn't cost them a penny suddenly start demanding a small retainer for their work, just to cover costs. The bumpkins cough up as the retainer is only small and it is divided between many people. Fast forward another month or two and a further request for money arrives, this time bigger. If they pay it a third arrives etc etc. And all this is before they even come to the killer - that should it ever go to court the barristers are going to want another large chunk payable up front and with no guarantee of winning. I can remember reading dozens of times about shareholder action groups being formed when the shareholders have lost money on their investments but I cannot think of a single time that they have been successful . It is just another way that the foolish are parted from their money."

Fantastic news from GL this morning on the Angus debt funding commitments. We have:

a) The conditional mandate letter for £8-9 million
b) The Aleph Loan facility for £11 million

So at the moment we have £20 million down in total from two different sources when we only need to raise £12 million. This is all happening now and for a company of Angus’ size to be raising £12 million in debt funding it shows just what a big deal Saltfleetby is really going to be.

Ignore the AAAG, they are long proven to be absolute idiots.

Yes, they have done a fantastic job and I think that we can look forward to a fantastic 2021 here. Have a great Christmas everybody.

Well on the one hand we have Aleph who have directors who have worked at: Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Macquarie, Engelhart, Koch Industries, Vantage Capital, Credit Suisse, and American Express.

On the other hand we have gkb47, ratsuss and the rest of the AAAG who have lost so much money on the stock market that they couldn't even rustle up a few thousand pounds to pay a lawyer to take on their "100% guaranteed case"!

Who to believe, the professionals or the forum trolls?

I think that members of the AAAG are the last people on this board that anyone should be taking investment advice from.

Just saying.

Rastuss yourself and the rest of the AAAG spent a lot of time criticising Angus for not having enough expertise on the team and now you are criticising them for having too much.

Anyone would think that you care nothing for the truth and simply have an anti-Angus agenda...

And certainly not from an individual who is ranked 8th in the all-time Angus rampers list yet has lost a fortune on the stock through poorly timed investments and whose greatest pearl of wisdom from September was "The loan company are just in to make money on interest payments".

Congratulations pal, you have just invented banks. ROTFPML

The AAAG remain invested in this share in very very small quantities, solely so that they can reply when they are asked that they are investors. They do not believe in the company or it’s future but instead believe that they are owed something by the company an it’s management.

A large quantity of the AAAG were very significant rampers of Angus in the past and it is a hilarious irony that they started to believe their own ramping and did not acknowledge the possibility that oil exploration could also be unsuccessful. I will not comment here on who the rampers are but if you follow the google link here it should be easy enough for you to find out. I suggest paying special attention to positions 2, 3 and 8 https://www.google.com/search?q=top+rampers&rlz=1C1CHBF_en-GBGB781GB781&oq=top+rampers&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i13i457j0i13l6.7087j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

They used these boards to recruit other investors to join their club and promised that they had been told that they had a case that was so good that they would be able to get third party funding for it and none of them would have to pay a penny. They made a big fuss about how they were going to bring Angus to account and yet the company never heard from them in a formal sense and instead they just turned up on this forum deramping day and night.

I imagine that what finally happened was that when they actually went to a lawyer they found out that legal advice is not free after all, no matter what they had previously been told. The lawyers love it when these naïve bumpkins arrive. I've seen it dozens of times. They come in with their made-up ideas of how they have been robbed and of course the lawyers tell them that they have such a great case that they are going to do the job on a no-win-no-fee basis. But this is just salesmanship. Fast forward a month or two and the same lawyers that promised that the case was cast-iron and wouldn't cost them a penny suddenly start demanding a small retainer for their work, just to cover costs. The bumpkins cough up as the retainer is only small and it is divided between many people. Fast forward another month or two and a further request for money arrives, this time bigger. If they pay it a third arrives etc etc. And all this is before they even come to the killer - that should it ever go to court the barristers are going to want another large chunk payable up front and with no guarantee of winning. I can remember reading dozens of times about shareholder action groups being formed when the shareholders have lost money on their investments but I cannot think of a single time that they have been successful . It is just another way that the foolish are parted from their money.

So they remain here deramping the share because the only thing that can make them feel worse about their losses is if the company recovers and becomes successful with them no longer invested.

This is the beginning of the big re-rate. Ownership of Schlumberger's block, the world's biggest oil services company as our keystone investor and $1.25 million in cash (oil at $44 per barrel).

This is the deal of the century.

Closing over 4p is a sign that this is now the support level from which the company can make the next step up from.

Any more pearls of wisdom such as "The loan company are just in to make money on interest payments" you want to share with the board gkb?

It's been a nightmare day (again) for the AAAG, but a bloody good one for Angus Energy.

£1 million raised in less than 100 minutes, is good going by any standards. That's £10,000 per minute.

Ha ha, the AAAG mugs are tearing themselves to bits this morning in the face of today's news. For all their so-called expertise Alan and gkb have been exposed as knowing nothing about Angus and nothign about oil and gas.

They claimed that SF would never make any money yet Angus are putting in a £12 million debt facility supported by the SF cashflow.

No wonder their little protest group never got anywhere. Absolutely laughable.

Alan, you are coming on here again and giving it the whole chat as if you know what you are talking about but you don't do you?

You posted for months and months that by your calculations Saltfleetby could not make money at any sensible gas prices and that even if it produced gas it would be loss-making.

Yet here we have Gneiss Energy who are industry experts putting together a £12 million debt package for Saltfleetby. They would not waste their time doing this if SF was not making money to service the debt. Nobody would.

So you were wrong again.

Give it up mate, you clearly know nothing about oil and gas. No wonder the AAAG have failed so dismally if they were relying on you.

Alan - I thought since you had gone crying to admin about me posting the history of you ramping Angus as you requested that you would not like me to post them again - however, if you would like to request that I repost everything then just say and I will happily do so.

Especially when some of them used to be the biggests rampers of this share back in the 30p days.

Alan, you seem to be working on the basis that somebody who joined in 2020 could not have been reading and keeping a record of the rampers before then. I can assure you it is perfectly possible to read the board without being a member.

You really thought that all of your ramping history had gone away when it slipped off your online history. Schoolboy error I'm afraid...

I notice that you have not actually denied that you have made these posts because you didn't you. I am sure that admin will be able to see this too as I suspect that their records go all the way back

Alan every opinion you have expressed on Angus has turned out to be wrong - from when you were ramping it at 30p+ to when you were defending Paul Vonk's disgusting "turn the taps on" comments to when you were suggesting that Rupert Labrum was colluding with the board to take the company private.

You have no credibility left. I'm afraid and nor do your AAAG buddies. Stick to making tea.

I'm going to ask the standard question of whether the company has heard from Real Analyst and the AAAG this month.

Any guesses on what the answer will be?

And here is gkb47 an AAAG founder member trying his hardest to spin the good news of a saving of over £500k on decommissioning into a bit of bad news again.

Inevitably he will be wrong, just like he and Alan were when they tried to imply that Rupert Labrum was working with the BoD to take the company private.

Do the AAAG ever get anything right?