RE: Sanderson19 Dec 2022 21:27
Ocelot,
For years you have just parroted what UKOG say.
Have you not noticed that almost every positive statement by UKOG about the likely outcomes of anything UKOG has done have been way off the mark. Even the majority of planned activities have failed to materialise - simply no longer mentioned as the next supposed crock of gold is dangled in front of 'investors'.
However any poster that has challenged the companies inability to convey the risks, or the likelihood of the plans materialising, and thus challenging the content of your posting, you have chosen not to respond to by filtering, and blindly repeat the company's PR until it's proved wrong or unmentioned for so long even you seem to accept it isn't happening.
Unfortunately those green boxes you find so amusing mostly explain why you have been, and still are being, misled by UKOG. So you will continue to spout nonsense about UKOG being serially unlucky and those you claim to filter just being lucky in predicting failure after failure - always the next wild goose chase being the sure thing - or some chartist nonsense proving somehow the SP will imminently rerate - if only UKOG would issue an helpful 'positive' RNS to coincide with the prediction.
Perhaps if you researched what really matters about the projects, in this case Resan Basur, you would understand that a find 50km away in a more central part of the play has little bearing on Resan Basur where UKOG must have extensive information about E Sadak, an adjacent field operated by AME, that UKOG has chosen to declare is a producing lookalike yet continues to not mention what that field produces either individually or collectively from the 13 plus wells drilled on it.
This adjacent field and the many wells already drilled in the licence suggests that in the context of the general area the Resan Basur licence is not underexplored, though perhaps has poor seismic coverage - not addressed until after Basur-3 - with plenty of warnings about water production and missed targets - perhaps why those filtered posters were not so positive about the success of Basur-3 as those that believed UKOG's line of a transformational appraisal drill.
As you won't read this you will no doubt continue to repeat, with little understanding and no judgement, the skewed opinions and claims that UKOG RNS or tweet, and attempt to spin any and every setback (failure, placing etc) as a positive - as you have so diligently over the years.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
