Member Info for Pecten11

Primarily yes, re JC, was just trying to find out how much of that time obligation will fall on others, rather than the top banana

Perro, do you know how many staff BOD employ not including James C?

Your post of 22 Nov should make things perfectly clear re your motivation

'And by the way, the majority of what I do are shorts ... Sml from 1.80, ted from 1000+, bids from 40p, bilb from 50p, NOG from 88p etc'

https://www.lme.com/en-GB/Metals/Non-ferrous/Copper#tabIndex=2

The- 'Been told that before' - I bet you've been told many things before, but am sure the swear filter would pick them up if you repeated them.......

Am i wrong ? Yes

It's more of a matter of timescale v macro/political

Any ideas of the value of the transaction, as it says acquired, not granted, implying the licenses where in the name of another company?

It says acquired, not granted, implying they've been bought (or some transaction - odd no details) from another company, rather than Zim Gov imo

SG2, yes the 'management of perception' is crucial, however, if you think HUR kick the can, there are multiple examples on AIM who are far, far worse.
Explicit timeline, though in theory sound great, are asking for trouble - some will sell, thinking they have a definite time to buy back, creating unnecessary volatility and if operational reasons cause a slight overrun, the SP gets hammered by speculation.
You know this isn't 'rocket science' and even that sometimes goes wrong

Pts, I would agree, HUR are and want to be seen as 'straight shooting' unlike far too many companies on AIM

IF they became aware of a Twitter (or similar) pump based on non RNSd info they shut it down, rightly so imo. Why should some gain - and others lose - due to 'creative speculation'

So was that the MM's stop loss hunting the trade at 08.22? Jeez that would be annoying.

Could also be an inflection point looking at long term history, but am no charting guru, so maybe someone else has a view.

Even with the challenges that ARS face and the pricing of commodities/trade deal macro picture, the mcap is looking slightly silly now imo

Probably a very silly question, but, theoretically could you have oil of different api in the same trap?
Over time the density should cause seperation/layering.
So what if, due to geological (fault) movement, two separate trapping (and possibly age of trap) zones became conjoined.

Don't shoot me, just a wild idea that popped into my head

That's a decent sized rollover at 11.50...

Anyone tell me the rationale for my posts being deleted? No live data or abuse - weird

This isn't my area, so happy to be corrected, but could the lack of rise on completion day be down to bodies who expected to receive 'Consideration Shares' having taken a 'long' position, knowing that when they receive their shares, they could close out, never having to have put cash up front with a standard buy
If so, those positions will unwind, meaning any demand forcing the SP rise that many expected 'should' happen

To the joint venture project, not to BOD themselves

'Loan payment' ?? Really?

Don't let the facts get in the way there Gold_Dust. - the original MoU with VAST said that they would be putting $1m into the JV, nothing to do with a loan or a payment to BOD

Beaching, tbf, Nickel sometimes has some good insights, particularly if looking at metrics/finances of established companies.

However, he does have an annoyingly stupid habit of replying to his own posts if he thinks there not having the desired effect - and that is simply deramping/ trolling - theres no other reason for it. SAD

At least in the initial phase, VAST are looking at alluvials in Marange, so a description of ore bodies is inaccurate Nickel.
Botswana may have an opinion and a very experienced team, but as can be seen from their announcement, they aren't currently 'in the loop' , so it's an incredibly general statement

Nickel it would be more surprising if, over the size of the Marange, that the geology wasn't complex

Hasn't stopped it being one of the most diamondiferous areas in the world

Agore, imo, yes some people will well by £ value - maybe they require funds for something else
The figure you quoted, could have been someone choosing to 'sell all' - the odd number generated over (multiple) trades

In reality, there could be multiple reasons - we all have slightly different motivations, timescales and resources