Member Info for Pecten11

Truly I would like to read more of the bb and get a better idea of the opportunity but while you've got the rampiest tw$t called Invester2015 giving it large then it's a no from me

Good to see The Sun has at last taken over from The Lancet and Nature as being the only source of up to date scientific news

Panda even on T20 he would be late declaring - who offers a T30? And btw, he'd still be late in that case!

How on earth does he get away with not declaring the change earlier! 40 + days. Ridiculous

Ripley, touched a nerve there did I?

Based on your reply, I shall ignore your 'advise' . Lol

Ripley, with all due respect, no one, unless they are a TW fan (??), is going to pay Sharepuppets for an article and your post comes across as an attempt at indirect advertising - which if true, deserves expulsion from the LSE platform

Barry, read before posting
Point 5, AP group own 20% of Baita and that has just been pledged as part of the deal (true no precise details)
Point 6, this tranche, yes for for paying creditors, but also to get Baita into production

You've got it wrong

Daz, you naughty man, if you're not careful his head might blow!

Mark 'having done my research'

Have you got a job as a comedy script writer? Lol, lol, lol

Agree Fantasy, the commitment of AP group and the directors sends out a strong signal re mutual alignment

Do find yesterdays RNS even more surprising in this context and if being cynical, wonder how many of those buys, will be sold into today's volume for a quick little turn

Stuart when you do win, are you going to buy a dictionary or spell checker? Lol :))

If it's that imminent (compared to drawdown requesst) then there is no need for the RNS - if it's not, then it's just an attempt to support the SP

Well that's one way yo try and get a thread deleted lol

Giving oxygen to those 'altruistic' posters who apparently are better informed than the legally responsible company BOD who have access to all current data, purely allows them to act like the Coronavirus and infect others.
Don't reply and they will wither and die

DIcky, don't encourage our newest oil expert 'it's pretty basic stuff'
Poor lad obviously hasn't covered fractured basement resevoirs in his reading materials yet

Mover123, the mcap is already around 490 million - sterling that is, not dollars

Re: "an update should have been made much sooner."
Persinaaly I disagree - it would almost create a precedent where if the company didn't respond to spurious suggestion, it would have to be true
A self destructive circle that's better avoided

LuckCounts unless you're worshipper of Hephaestus, a very strange post.

Dr T using the happy excuse of a positive trading update to enforce the point - don't listen to random s$$t stirrers on bulletin boards, we are fully aware if our responsibilities - 'We look forward to continuing to update the market with quarterly production figures, and will announce any material variations to expectations as required."
Nuff said

Rob one - do you style yourself as some sort of upper class thief ?? Lol

One thing interesting to note is the tabular results in the RNS do not have a strictly linear relationship to the change in choke size which suggests Bloe may be able to find a more optimal drawdown result over the period of the well test.

Hopefully so, as the water cut appears to increase with reduction in choke size and the RNS states 'To reduce the amount of gas flared, the choke size has been reduced to a diameter of 9/32" for the remainder of the test, which is expected to continue until 31 January 2020. The well will then be shut-in to measure the pressure build-up and determine technical reservoir qualities, then put back on production at a choked-back rate of 200 boepd to conserve gas and reduce flaring while gas facilities are being installed. '
I.e at a lower rate than any of the figures in the table (9/32" choke for 279 boepd at 77% cut)