Member Info for Pecten11

And did your PhD cover proofreading before submission 'Claire'

ROFL

foresight - where you up all night working on your homework?

Further seismic over time may well occur re the GLA, but the production data and continued pi of the wells are what is currently available, Hurricane have always been clear that they wanted at least 12 months of steady production data to improve the evaluation of the field.

Ezhik, sad but true.
Just wait till he adds his in critical analysis re pharma - be able to sell it onto a stand-up

I just keep reporting ttt when he/she does this as it as a deliberate attempt to deceive.

Also change the header if you reply to him/her- it wants to try and propagate negative phraseology

'There is no reason why this sp should at least treble from here imo.'

StZ- cant work out whether that's the worst execution of a ramp I've ever seen, or the worst execution if a deramp!!

Truly execptional - did you write your listings the same way lol

Feelinlucky, remind me, just how massive, is the massive oil column?

I wonder whom should I listen to?
HUR who specified, in advance, the design and capabilities of the AM to be able to cope with at least this quantity of water, to enable continued production from wells with a very high PI
Or
Those reactive posters, who don't have access to the data set available to the HUR technical teams but still think they know better.

Now, now, Nickel - your normally concentrate on cash flow, profit and debt and can make it sooner you know what you're talking about.
Concentrate on the same thing here and leave the technical stuff to those who know what they're talking about

Interesting try at a cross promote there barnetpeter - shame you don't also mention that other share you mentioned is still below its consolidation price

Nice to be in a position where you don't need to keep track of your investments - lol

There was a share consolidation, so the price may have gone up,but the number of shares you own has decreased ( by a factor of 100 to 1)

What a surprise - not.
The 'supposed' litigation funder has pulled out after a little pump of volume allowed some to escspe6

Now, an asset in Cuba - nice for a holiday, not so, for investors who would like clarity over administrative and financial machinations considering this companies history.

The boardroom intermingling would look very unhealthy from a genetic POV- lol

If that's not an RNS designed to pump volume , don't know what is

Non-binding, nothing to happen until after Covid restrictions are eased.

Nothing of any value to the company at this point in time. Parsons et al at their lowest

who can predict 2, 3 or 23 years....ahead - (or 2/3 for that matter)if it wasnt ahead, it would be called history!

Actually everyone can predict 2, 3 or 23 years in the future - doesn't mean they'll be right though!
Apart from, of course, predicting your view of joy, happiness and optimism, bartle- lol

Bartle that depends on what, if any character tou put between the 2 and the 3
.
/
-
Makes a big difference to most, though of course in your case, I'm sure you'll assume the worst

ADUK thanks for the response, apart from referring to the individual I observed licking his fingers as my acquaintance- only true in the most literal sense, most definitely not in any meaningful way.

At the moment the actual method of transmission, the incubation period of the virus and the viral load needed for differing degrees of infection is still to be confirmed, so yes, it is possible that the SARS-CoV-2 virus gas been in circulation for longer, however, the commonality of the cases/mortality curves worlwide would suggest otherwise.
Perhaps the key dataset presently missing, is the %of asymptomatic cases in the population - something which could manifestly change the current predictive models

Bartle, when you started posting, I may not have agreed with some of your points of view, but at least they were well written and it appeared you could manage a cogent argument - sadly, as time has gone on, that quality has disappeared, become personal and abusive.
If you are having issues with other parts of your life, you have my sympathy, especially in these current difficult times for most, but please either desist for your own good or ask a professional for help

Looks good, thanks for the reminder!!

RoFL

I'm not the one confused bartle - 'give wispy opinions plucked out of thin air. '

Pot and kettle - judge yourself by the standards you want to set for others

Bartlebobton, you seem obsessed with trying to get a rise out of ADUK - grow up
Most of your contributions are truly pointless and driven by narcissism

ADUK, that Oxford paper is potentially dangerous (though I fully support them writing it, it's just how it's been publicised rather than peer reviewed), because it would then imply that the incubation period for the virus is far longer than currently thought, which means that for social isolation to have any impact it will go on for far, far longer.
I've already personally witnessed one person behaving in a challenging way because, as he put it 'I'm immune, I caught it in January', then pointedly licked his fingers before paying for something in cash.
The original Ferguson report is well worth everyone read - https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf