RE: Shorts8 Feb 2020 08:57
ADUK
'I too am interested in the way so many media comments seem to be 'accentuating the negative' in parallel with the SP drop. But remember, all of these so-called 'stock pundits' are being paid by someone, and most journalists don't really care where the money's coming from so long as there's a free buffet thrown in.'
I totally agree re the 'stock pundits' getting paid by someone, to me the question is - is this confirmation bias writing (it's far easier to follow the herd, rather than risking a reputation by going with a personal opiniin/analysis, while satisfying the editorial desire for an article)and punditry, and if so, who was the initial driver of this now negative opinion? And what was the motive behind the formation of that opinion?