Member Info for Pecten11

Captain, surely the most appropriate response to dspp 'unpalatable choice of believing or not-believing their interpretation.' would be something like 'what is perhaps more unpalatable is someone trying to convince others of their interpretation based on far less data'

Sorry 7z. Doh

Buzz, does it specify over what time period the 100000 barrels of water disposal is required? I.e. actually over 12 months, or is it an annualised figure but actually over a shorter time period?
Why, cos maybe it is tl run the 7a hard to drain the perched water

AS01 - 'My understanding is that perched water will build up following a shut-in'

Where is it meant to build up from? By definition it is stranded I.e. not linked to a reservoir

Yes, of course , thats what typing before thinking gets you - thanks ODR

Daz if the current bout of posters could be considered 'extremely positive' , imagine what level it will be turned up to if news did arrive (too allow a sell at an even higher margin)

Re the ownership/director if the new companies, where would the law stand wrt directors of an insolvent company?
Could that be the rationale?

They can be very waspish....

Nice one Oopsi (and ODR!)

Alexsmallun, tell me what a 90% chance of success means?

Mizman do you expect confirmation of the drawdown to increase the volume of transactions and/or cause a change in the SP?

If so, its price sensitive

If IR have given pricecsensitive news to shareholders without it being RNSd then they could be found culpable

Mark, I think we will all be astonished if what you say comes true lol

Then again, coincidences do happen!

Actually what you said on Jan 10th at 10.00 was :
'I have it in written form straight from Andrew, its defo 10 working days.'

If you're going to try and delete any inconvenient posts, try not to miss any.

I'm not guilty gov - I was just following orders lol

Mmmm, is it admin trying to clean up the stables, or the 'fly me to the moon' crew trying to get rid of any challenge to their tripe/hype

Hmmm, my last post was deleted, no abuse, no live prices - someone not liking the rationale.

Mark your post of 10.31 'It is not a lie. Its info which is out in the public domain, people had been saying 10 working days well before I had mentioned it. Just DYOR. If you cannot find it around then you are clearly not doing it hard enough.'

If it's in the public domain, post a link, put the argument to bed and the SP should respond to fact. Simples

Good point gkb - does the RNS imply that Mercuria have agreed the inter creditor agreement?
If so, VAST should make that point explicit in the RNS

Mizman, with all due respect, don't start quoting or counting on production from BP - it's like suffering with premature production!
Yes Baita should be fcf generating asset for VAST before the end of 2020 iIF timelines (?!) Are met

newliberty - would you care to offer your personal definition of integrity?
I like starting new decades with comedy lol