Member Info for Pebble101

After Mandy's 'no news is good news' I'm not sure I trust her replies to mean anything positive for the SP.

I got some at just over 330p yesterday. Goes a small way to offset the 900p I paid for some a while back!

The neighbours' son was on a stag do recently, several of them have now tested positive for covid.

In answer to your question, if we knew this sort of information we would all be millionaires.

Not sure that testing will fall away. I lost my sense of taste yesterday and went for a test. It was negative (hoped it would be as I had my second vaccine last week) but it's the first PCR test I have had.

Markets don't like uncertainty, at least they will know and SP will probably go up :)

I did buy some more last week but today I am having serious doubts. I will hold as I think it can't go much lower and I don't want to crystallize the paper losses. If I hadn't had so much faith in the company and averaged up along the way I would still be showing a profit as I have held since Feb 2020.

Nice theory but would it make more sense if the government had paid for the tests then they would take delivery and give them away?

Was dated Jan not May, a mix up with US date format.

I can open it too - perhaps you need a twitter account?

Would love to see this but sadly booked in for root canal treatment :( I'm sure there will be lots of comment so I can catch up when I get back.

Also receipt of orders taking longer than anticipated. I wonder if that is true of the sector and it is why GM put in those negative statements.

I expect there are a lot of us who hold both.

I've just put another in the bin.

Sharedealer, they know what the dispute is about and how much is disputed. We have no idea, everything has been pure speculation.

Found this about AIM rules : As a result of the implementation of MAR, AIM Rule 21 was replaced by a requirement for AIM-listed companies to implement a share dealing policy which complies with a set of minimum requirements. The definition of a close period (redefined as a ‘closed period’) was also amended to be the 30 days prior to the release of financial results. The restrictions on dealing while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information remain.

Irrespective of that I agree with others that they are in possession of insider information that hasn't been released to the market.

Agree with baldingquickly (are you my husband?). It gives them a bit longer to get the dispute resolved, although they could have asked for a three month extension. Sensible move I think.

Darton, they could apply for a 3 month extension for publishing.

I am coming round to the same opinion as you. Tay on Twitter is the least positive I have seen him/her.

I hope I'm wrong, the deal gets sorted and we have a wonderful RNS soon.

Well I really didn't think this would drop any lower. I have no choice really but to ride this one out - it will be more long term than I originally anticipated. Have got to dreading RNS's now - they used to be exciting. Held since last March and been averaging up since.