Member Info for Pdub

I see the lying dishonest rat has plagued the bb again, this time it’s a burning smell that gives it away.

This individual is banned from LSE for offences such as lying, misleading the market and abusive comments. If you trust anything they say then more fool you. Once again they have crawled back in out of office hours to avoid security just to attack LTHs and disrupt the bb. Yes believe it or not this behaviour is from someone over 18 .., hard to believe !

Anyway they will be detected by Admin before opening and no doubt the comments will be removed.

New investors need to learn to spot these trolls (not hard). Remember they are trying to damage your investment.

Best action?

Ignore
Report and request identity check
Email complaint to Admin.

Excellent post Sanchez

middleEastMoney another loud mouth so desperate poor soul to show the world how clever you are. I hope I six months time you have managed to tame your needy self. One more for the ‘useless’ bin.

Haha yes it was.

As for the other stuff it’s one day at a time. No other way. And of course keep fighting. And that of course is what we must do here as there are those who wish to rob genuine investors of their hard earned cash and shares, as evidenced this morning.

Regards. Paul.

That long term commitment will no doubt be repeated elsewhere around the world. Future looks very bright for any company supplying vanadium or electrolyte or rental packages or VRFBs.

Even better for a company that intends to do all of that .... BMN / Bushveld Energy

I see on Sky News that China has announced that they are to be Carbon neutral by 2060. Currently I believe they burn more coal than other nations put together.

Quite apart from the huge positive impact on the environment that this move would have, renewables and battery storage must have a very important role to play in the endeavour. Given that large VRFB projects are being developed in China I can’t help thinking that this will put enormous upward pressure on Vanadium demand and therefore price. As BMN have two of the four primary vanadium plants the future for BMN / Bushveld Energy looks very exciting.

Thanks pb. Typo. Should be 2060

I see on Sky News that China has announced that they are to be Carbon neutral by 2016. Currently I believe they burn more coal than other nations put together.

Quite apart from the huge positive impact on the environment that this move would have, renewables and battery storage must have a very important role to play in the endeavour. Given that large VRFB projects are being developed in China I can’t help thinking that this will put enormous upward pressure on Vanadium demand and therefore price. As BMN have two of the four primary vanadium plants the future for BMN / Bushveld Energy looks very exciting.

Time to give it a rest Calamari.

Sanchez that is exactly what sickens me about people like Calamari. You nailed it.

This is one selfish individual that will say or do anything to get an entry price. Disgraceful. Many of those ordinary investors need their investment to do well. To read trolls like Calamari is very frustrating.

For my part I needed BMN to do well so that I could pay for private treatment not available on NHS to keep me alive. That hasn’t happened so I may be faced with selling my house instead. So a big thank you Calamari for rubbing my face in it today. I hope you enjoy your hard earned 5% or whatever that your trolling is targeting. Have a nice day young man, but think about the real consequences of your actions.

YTSS I will email my mobile number to Alfa and ask him to pass on to you.

Regards. Paul.

Finally Calamari the current share price is a function of a large and persistent institutional seller. Fact. Check out the RNS.

It does not reflect company performance.

Surely you are not naive enough to think the share price would be anywhere near these low levels if those millions of shares had not been dumped?

We now have clear evidence to explain why the Covid drop in sp has not seen the recovery experienced by many other companies. However that is a finite supply and will end. Like many here I expect to see a rapid bounce when that happens.

Calamari you can wriggle and squirm all you like but here are some facts for you.

You claim BMN are CURRENTLY loss making.... not six months ago ... NOW. I challenged your ability to substantiate that claim. You can’t. Your only comeback is to mutter about H1 results. Lesson for you ... those are historical figures ... not current profitability which is what you so boldly (and in my opinion so wrongly) claim.

So don’t waste my time trying to mislead that BMN and CURRENTLY loss making by reference to H1 results which reference a period ending several months ago. You attempted to mislead and now you have been challenged and throwing your toys out of the pram. Tough.

As far as H1 results are concerned why don’t you adopt a mature approach and wait to see what those results show about the six months ending several months ago (not current) when Covid19 lockdown inevitably affected BMN as with just about every other company on the planet.

Remember since that period ended BMN have been in full production and also increasing their sales to China 18% at the last Q2 report I believe with the higher profit margins that brings. Any sensible investor would be praising this redirected sales strategy ... but not you. And we know that they are working hard on cost control and been very successful at that.

Your rather childish “... and we will be able to see who was correct and who was not.” is irrelevant. I don’t know what H1 figures will show because in a rather sensible manner I am waiting to see. You are the one making predictions. But that is not the point. You claim BMN are CURRENTLY making a loss. ie today this week this month. I disagree. The evidence as available suggests that the company have handled this crisis with remarkable skill and with full production and sales to China increasing and increasing production efficiencies the Q3 numbers should look very much better.

I have watched your antics over a number of years and frankly not impressed. I will continue t9 challenge any misleading nonsense from you.

And again Calamari you are very quick to be negative about BMN in your 02.32 post criticising another poster’s comparison yet in the same post you acknowledge that you haven’t researched the numbers for the other companies!!!

When using published data all those companies would be subject to the same accountancy rules. Therefore the comparisons are valid, whether or not that suits you.

I am puzzled why you are always so quick to be negative about BMN but yet not so with the other companies. You may understand why I am so cynical when I read your posts. You have a long history of this.

Calamari you wrote “In my opinion BMN is currently losing money, even after excluding Covid costs, and therefore has a negative P/E”.

Now first of all I respect that is your opinion. I disagree. However we are both guessing. Remember you specifically said “... currently ...”. There are no published figures that allow you to substantiate your claim that BMN are “currently” making a loss ie right now, this week!!! Published costs v published V price suggest otherwise.

Instead of making HIGHLY speculative negative statements that you cannot possibly substantiate why not take a more reasonable approach and wait for published figures. Then you can validate your opinions with actual facts.

Others like myself might then regard your opinions with less suspicion.

Perhaps Uksteveg you could try being a little more positive about the great things that bmn have and are achieving you may have attracted a little less flack.

Too many here are concentrating on negatives yet we ALL invest for positive reasons. And for serious investors BMN offers SO many positives.

Just my opinion but if you haven’t exploited this low price then you may look back with regret later.

Many missed that opportunity in 2016 when sp also went low. But then look what happened in 2017 and 2018. I would only worry about the share price if the company stops delivering, and given all they are achieving (higher sales to China, lower production costs, Vanchem providing diversity of production, BE partnerships, rental agreements, progress on electrolyte plant and mini grid, etc etc ).

We know that the current share price is a function of large seller, Covid global crisis and a dose of mm games (and yes some LTHs selling) but NONE of that relates to company performance. Sooner or later true value will be reflected in the sp. only question is: How many shares will you own when that happens?

All the above is just my opinion.

And I have been buying over the last couple of weeks. Not much ... just what I can afford.

And I have now more cash waiting. At this level in would simply be rude not to.

Exactly my point Libero. Let’s hope that message is sinking in.

Been out most of the day so thought I would check in only to find the usual moaning and negativity. Ok you are frustrated with the share price .... aren’t we all .... but is that really an excuse?

Are you blind to the significance of today’s RNS? Do you not realise that this is good news?

We now know that the sp has been hit by a large institutional seller. No more mystery. It’s there in black and white. Of course significant pi’s selling hasn’t helped and I am sure the mischievous mms have had a go, but now we know what we are dealing with. And the supply of shares is finite (assuming they even want to sell all their shares!)

So perhaps it is nothing to do with Duferco or the myriad of other conspiracies suggested. At least we know the enemy now.

This is a great resources and energy storage company.... instead of moaning let’s get back to telling that story. There is a lot more to be positive about with BMN.

Well people are free to make whatever comments they wish about common sense. What is interesting is that a post founded on common sense has already attracted nearly 50 recommendations !!!

Say what you like but common sense seems to prevail. And long may it be so.