No fundraise required31 Jan 2024 09:08
The RNS outlines the risks, as Metalhead refers to. Anyone with half a brain knows that a ore0revenue mining company with no income from activities (aside from grants) will require funding of some sort. This has never been avoided, in fact, MR has been very clear about this. They have taken longer than expected to get the first funder on board, the DFC (still not yet on board but almost certainly will be. Eveb this week an RNS was announced with a "letter of interest".
Going forward, its not practicable that BRES woulc fund OC through a placing. I am not saying that they will never place, but they need a funder, whether this is solely DFC, or more likely another partner with deep pockets. So the way i see it is:
1. We have circa $1.5m in the bank through x2 grants
2. There is a remaining $3m to come - all will be achieved / paid (total $5m)
3. We require funding at some point prior to the mine being operational - likely H2 2024
4. We are currently enagaged with a lot of off take partners and potential strategic funders (note - they have already turned down one strategic funder, so it is not if, but rather whom they go with)
5. The grant money will be sufficient to get us to the end of 2024
6. 600 tonne results will be back end of H1 / early H2 2024
7. When results are back, offtake (money upfront possible) deals can be finalised as can strategic funding
8. The funding of the mine is likely to be part funded by the DFC and part funded by strategic investment
I am relatively relaxed about the above, and think today's market reaction is a complete over-reaction. I expect that MR will clarify this further in interviews.