Member Info for Paul0410

The new cleaner is actually called Doris you complete numpty Ray. Don’t you ever get anything right??!!!

Has anyone tried to trade via the mechanism on Oberon yet - just wondered what prices are being offered?

I'm assuming that you'll be able to get a contract note from your broker which confirms ownership of shares and use that if you wish to trade via Oberon prior to re-listing.

If AAQUA doe become the next big social media platform you only have to look at the likes of Facebook to see where this sp could be heading.

JonesRichard - I mentioned your sidekick ramper that turns up in pairs with you on different boards. I couldn't remember the name but low and behold how did I fail to spot Boom123 on here too! Clearly two traders working in unison. Neither to be trusted imho.

JonesRichard - you're a complete fraud - do you agree with that too?! Anyone who wants to check out your credentials should look at CTEA which you ramped to hell for a few days a couple of months ago and which is now a third of its value and is pretty much a worthless business. An apt description for you actually. I'll leave you with that remark and will engage with you no further.

JonesRichard is not to be trusted. Ramps the hell out of different shares with unfounded claims and then amazingly disappears when his work is done. Only reappear elsewhere. He's usually accompanied by a sidekick who works off him although the name escapes me (I can think of a few of my own though!) Filter on sight.

Hi all - my first post on here. Firstly, a massive thank you for those who offer well researched opinions on here. You've saved me a hell of a lot of time and convinced me to buy into what is without doubt a first rate company with what should be a fantastic future ahead. I originally bought in at £1.31 and then doubled my hold at £1.81. I've held ever since until last week when my confidence waned and I sold everything at £2.25. The mistake I made was fixating on too many of the negative and in hindsight completely unqualified posts on here from the doom merchants. Whenever the share takes a dip they seem to infest the place. Coupled with that, my profit here was covering a loss elsewhere and I went into panic mode as the share slid. Then came the RNS and I was cursing my luck. I'm happy to say that I've rethought over the weekend and bought back in this morning as I believe this has a long way to go. I've ploughed all of my profits back in too in order to minimise the damage done by my panic sale and to give myself a margin. I obviously can't recover the better position that I had but that's no reason not to reinvest and learn from the mistake. I guess that I'm simply posting my experience to hopefully help others avoid the same mistake and to keep your nerve and ignore the doom merchants! We live and learn and I hopefully won't make the same mistake again.

Ping - yes the silence since the last news does speak of an arrogant dismissiveness towards shareholders. I'm hoping that they might still be negotiating behind the scenes but not holding my breath

Wyn - precisely. When you think of what is potentially further down the line with this company what happens this week to the sp is an irrelevance. Unless, as you say, you’re trading the share. It goes from the sublime to the ridiculous on here. One minute we’ll all be millionaires and next minute we’re all doomed ??

Wyndrum - you’re probably right about many being over-invested on here and the pyschology of a price drop becoming a vicious circle/self-fulfilling prophecy. That’s if people allow it to be. It’s a game that holders can avoid by switching off from here and not checking back in until Friday or even Monday morning. If you genuinely believe in the fundamentals of the company then ignore the short-term volatility. And the best way to do that is to switch off and avoid the noise! And not forgetting we saw a similar drop followed by recovery a week or so back.

Darkcorner - absolutely spot on about RichardJones and not forgetting his/her echo chamber SenatorBoomtime. I'm all for a contract of some sort landing in the near future but 10p will be a milestone for this share nevermind £1 or £10. Any talk of those values is ludicrous and does the board a disservice. The share is a good risk against reward gamble but not for the figures that these jokers are mentioning!

OneJag - similar to me. I bought a month or so ago at just over 4p. I'm happy it's now well north of that and think it will stay there. I decided a long time ago that you can't beat yourself up about your purchase price if/when you drop into the red, as long as you've bought for the right longer term gains.

Blaim - I start from the principle that anyone who is positive about the company on here will have more than likely invested in it and it is therefore in their interests and their pysche to be positive. Why would I therefore criticise them. And ultimately I take what they say with a proverbial pinch of salt regardless as anyone else should. However those who are nothing but negative clearly have no investment here and are purely trying to be destructive for their own malicious reasons dressed up as some sort of moral crusade. The LSE boards are infected with them - it must be some sort of psychological disorder - either that or some sort of denial complex.

Mitch - I won't need to either concede or expect congratulations irrespective of the outcome as I haven't expressed views one way or another on the share. I simply see my investment as a risk against reward approach that could go either way. But I'm an adult responsible for my own choices as any investor should be. What I don't really get or appreciate is the people who seem to hang around to post constant negatives under the sanctimonious pretext of it apparently being somehow for the greater good.

Blaim - well your low number of posts to date on LSE suggests that you're not quite as vocal as you infer, or, that if you are you must have multiple aliases. Hmmmmm..........

Blaim - so is it just this one AIM company that you provide your protect the gullible investor service on or do you cover them all.
Quite a job if you do them all given that investors tend to lose money on 70 per cent or so of AIM companies. Higher risk for higher reward. If it's just this one I'm wondering how you came to settle here - and whether you and Mitch one and the same.

Blaim - well it's good to see that you're confident enough to read his mind and speak on his behalf. But you don't really answer the question. I could find numerous examples of what I might see as dubious offerings on AIM but do I really want to waste my life posting comments on those boards simply to undermine the opinions of others when I have no financial interest in them myself. Everyone does everything ultimately to achieve a hoped for outcome. So repeatedly criticising a share in which you have no interest indicates to me some sort of personal grievance against the company or an effort to get others to sell and lower the price. And probably delusional on both accounts. If you can offer an alternative explanation then please do.

Mitch - do you actually own any shares in CTEA? If you do why don't you just sell and move on given that all you post about the company is negative. I can't understand why anyone would have such a derisory viewpoint if he/she was a shareholder as it's counter-productive from whichever way you look at it.

Even more intriguing is who would bother posting a message on here about a company he/she thought so little of. It does make you wonder.......