Transparency11 Sep 2020 20:41
Good research by Introv finds a current building application for an electrolyte plant for Bushveld at the Brits mine. Chika declares that the person who filed the application has made an error regarding the location. Please note Chika did not say there is no application for a second electrolyte, just that there is an error in location. Chika is correct, the location should read Vametco
where according to the rns dated 11th July 2018 states “ an EIA also required for the chemical plant that will be co located with Bushveld’s existing mining and processing facility at Vametco.”
One thing that i have noticed with Fortune having been a shareholder for 7 years is that he points you in the direction of travel and to the best of his ability will deliver. Therefore the application to build a second electrolyte plant is in my opinion correct even though the location might not be quite accurate and Chika is correct that the location as declared on the form is not exactly correct but she is in my opinion being absolutely correct, but trying to be evasive. Chika i am led to believe reads this board, i believe her reply to Introv was classic prevarication and equivocation. If there is no second electrolyte being incorporated with the chemical plant at Vametco she should say so.