Member Info for originalharrystamper

And a tweet from TC as well:

https://twitter.com/simecatlantis/status/1313741750939406337?s=21

It’s actually a very informative article in the Daily Mail that uses a lot of facts and figures to put things into perspective. Some good topics to explore and discuss in there. OHS

Hmmmmm, I wonder what other green energy could be used to help Boris’ pledge out? (insert thinking emoji here)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8812855/ZION-LIGHTS-former-Extinction-Rebellion-member-doubts-Boris-Johnsons-wind-power-plan.html

Is that your delayed buy OT? : •

Been back reading through all the NRW correspondence. Found this and thought it was interesting:

The oxford English dictionary defines biogenic as being “Produced or brought about by living organisms.” In the context of the SUP waste derived fuel pellets this material would constitute ‘biomass’, meaning the biodegradable fraction of products, waste and residues of biological origin from agriculture, forestry and related industries and the biodegradable fraction of wastes. The vast majority of this material contained within the fuel pellets is waste paper and cardboard which cannot be effectively recycled.

Because the carbon contained within this material has relatively recently been absorbed from the atmosphere in the form of CO2 during the life of the parent plant material, the CO2 released during its combustion is deemed net zero at point of use.

Biogenic carbon is that in plant-derived material, such as waste paper and cardboard, whereas fossil carbon is that in material derived from fossil fuels, such as plastics. Only fossil carbon is regarded as causing a net increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration, having been released from long-term geological storage. Biogenic carbon was drawn down from the atmosphere by the plants during growth prior to being released again by combustion, so over this short cycle does not change the net atmospheric concentration, provided that the C content is released as CO2 and not as methane (CH4, such as from a decomposition process).

ticking up nicely, still can't get an order for £1K though. Happy with 22.50p re-entry but still p****d I missed 22.00p!, Ha!

Dummy buys - I'm assuming you are buying with an online account? If so, you simply go through the process of buying/selling the stock and when you get the 'offered quote' from the broker, you either accept it or not - that's the actual live price. That's how I do it anyway

But on a serious note, I think a balance between options 2 and 3 is more likely to be the case and would be a good outcome for both SAE and NRW imo

Option 3 - exactly ;)

Silentalker - Wow! Now that's how you enter a forum with a first post! Very interesting view. In short, no idea but I think the investment and time that has gone into this project will ensure that the appropriate classification will be met to appease all parties. OHS

ha! I only left in spirit - my body was still here! Something or nothing but I've just been trying a number of dummy buys and can't get one for £1K......OHS

Yes, I kept dummy trading and unfortunately a little bit of hesitating cost me an extra 0.5p! I've pretty much done similar to you with regard to now having a slightly smaller holding than previous but at a lower entry price than my exit price so I cant complain (unless it drops again, ha!)

And it goes blue as I type!

OT - I’ve just bought some as well...... :) I’ve just been listening to Boris - there’s going to be an investment scramble to buy into green energy companies now - the buy ticked up as I was checking live prices so I’m back in at 22.50. Sold at just under 25.00 so I made a few extra, ha! I could have started looking around and researching one in the wind sector but why bother when I have SAE right here! Time to re read and research the floating wind farm section of SAE. OHS

OT - did you derisk totally and sell all or keep some in here? I was contemplating buying back in as it seemed 22p was quite supportive but now this statement of every home you be powered by wind farms within 10 years suggests the UKs goal to be carbon neutral is gaining more momentum - do you think this will have an adverse affect on the requirement to bring the UPS project to fruition? There is still an obvious need to reduce landfill and therefore UPS is perfect for that but I’m struggling to understand the governments perspective on what they are truly aiming for? Carbon neutral is a great theory but how are they going to get rid of non recycled waste?

Great minds OT - I posted earlier and I think you posted a few weeks back which reminded me of it this time round, ha! Triple whammy!

Lets steer attention away from UPS for a while and promote tidal power:

https://www.rechargenews.com/wind/uk-seeks-best-use-of-floating-offshore-wind-tidal-and-wave-energy/2-1-866426

That's the phrase I was trying to remember OT - contracts for difference. That's why I questioned the Boris statement alluding to all UK homes powered by wind by 2030 - it doesn't strengthen our corner with tidal does it

OT - cheers for the link mate, another good find for the forum. I know you’re a lot more researched on MeyGen than I am; my interest and blinkers was always on Uskmouth! I reread the following paragraph a couple of times but am I missing something regarding Hydro?: “Regarding hydropower, there is already an appropriate Generating Technology Class (Hydro), although this does not currently include tidal flow, waves, ocean currents and geothermal hydropower. We are open to expanding this Generating Technology Class to include these sub-categories in the future, if requested by the developers of such projects and/or if there is sufficient evidence provided in response to this open letter or future open letters consulting on the addition of new technologies to the Capacity Market.” - Id ‘hydro’ doesn’t include tidal flow, waves, ocean currents and geothermal hydropower - what does it include? And what is the ‘Appropriate Generating Class (Hydro) if it doesn’t contain these?

I’m hoping this is just a Daily Mail summation and it’s not just wind he’s taking about?! If so, it doesn’t give us much of a fighting chance to win any bidding rounds with MeyGen

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8808135/Boris-Johnson-promises-wind-farms-power-home-Britain-ten-years.html