RE: RE: Soon21 Sep 2021 10:22
@degsie & @Mer. I understand your frustrations around our joint venture valuations, but it's tricky to value them. Sure, @Kiran could value them based on sunken costs, or NPV based on existing mining plans. But I suspect there is a risk in stating these values if it came to sale/negotiations, and would reaffirm to the market our low CapEx - for surely our BoD believe their value, as many here do, will prove to be significantly higher than this in time - and why we continue to hold on to them - even preventing a re-domicile for one. They've indicated this in the past, but to place a concrete value on it? What do you expect them to say?: IF BCN do this, and IF HAS do that, then they'll be worth $$$... No, that won't sit well coming from us. Instead I'm hopeful that once Amapa closes WHI will issue a report, where THEY can do a risked analysis of everything resulting in a pounds and pence valuation, where they are well within their rights to take into account expansion plan likelihoods from Sonora and Yangibana, as they did for Cinovec. All in my humble opinion. But perhaps I'm wrong, perhaps @Kiran could produce something akin to my estimates of the Sonora JV's under various expansion plans in an RNS. I doubt it though.