RE: Every day3 Mar 2022 08:19
I think you are missing a few key words and ultimately the point @TJ: "This was justified by the rhetoric of having to do it to take us straight to 27%" - should read: "This was justified by the rhetoric of having the capability to take us to 27% when called upon". If our JV partners were playing hardball and could see we likely didn't have the means to provide these funds within the allotted time, then to do well by their shareholders, no matter how friendly they may appear on a personal level to our BoD, they MAY have decided to execute that play - essentially kicking us out of the project, and this is what we needed to protect against. But you don't execute a play if you can see that the recipient has the means... Foreclosures come to mind as an analogy. So in my mind, it's completely possible we haven't even started to take the 27% yet. And we shouldn't if we have a choice - we should take it as late as possible, letting the project derisk: if it falls apart I'd rather we had the additional circa £2m on our books rather than tied up in legal shenanigans in Amapa.
For the avoidance of doubt, I don't think Amapa is falling apart, or will fall apart, and I think it is likely we HAVE started the procedure to take 27%, but like the 20% these things take time...
Ob.