Member Info for observer842

For instance this was reported in the official diaries on the 5th Feb, but we'd seen it via "I am not a robot" at the end of January:

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/1111087490/djsp-judicial-1a-instancia-capital-05-02-2021-pg-1076

@EV_Bull - the courts are reporting 3Mt of ore, we are reporting 1.39Mt at the private port. Therefore there is likely ore elsewhere - perhaps at the mine?

LoL! How could I have missed that!? Thanks @EV_Bull. Though I'm still suspicious that it's scraped from somewhere which is public without "I am a not a robot" protection. The diaries for instance?

Indeed EV_Bull. I guess what I'm getting at is wherever they have scraped that from, its nearly a week behind and includes a summary which I hadn't seen before. Had you? Perhaps it's someone's take and not official documentation? Perhaps there is a site we have yet to discover where once published rulings are effective? And it is this which it is scraped from?

I've now compared. Looks identical. Great! :-)))

It only showed up on that site today, and I think there is a little more to it than on the other site, but I can't be certain as haven't looked in detail. Point being, it's showed up within a week as @Kiran suggested. Whether or not it's good or bad I can't say just yet. You?

And look what's turned up:

https://tj-sp.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/1167053950/embargos-de-declaracao-civel-embdeccv-21994802720208260000-sp-2199480-2720208260000

Full Content is available.

@EV_Bull?

That might explain it!

https://www.cadenceminerals.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/20210209-Traduc%CC%A7a%CC%83o-Juramentada-2199480-27.2020.8.26.0000-v01.pdf
===[
This document is a copy of the original, digitally signed by ..., released in the file on 02/08/2021, at 9:42 pm
]===

From what I can see, the hearing and judgement was on the 8th, but they often date things the next day for reasons which are unclear.

The judgement didn't occur via the main case @tomcat. It occurred in the case @Cause linked to on 09 Feb 2021 10:25

The 8th...

https://www.cadenceminerals.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/20210209-Traduc%CC%A7a%CC%83o-Juramentada-2199480-27.2020.8.26.0000-v01.pdf

That's some good research there @EV_Bull! If @Kiran works weekend's we might be seeing an RNS first thing tomorrow. During the day or on Tuesday otherwise...

@tomcat - we are discussing court movement in relation to the recent ruling to allow shipment of up to $10m net of ore on the main case:

https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cpopg/show.do?processo.codigo=2S000I22C0000&processo.foro=100
===[
MOVEMENTS
Date Movement
02/12/2021 Joint Digitization Intermediate Petition
Protocol No.: WJMJ.21.40190622-2 Petition Type: Intermediate Petition - Digitization Date: 12/02/2021 13:16
02/12/2021 Joined Declaration Embargoes
Protocol No.: WJMJ.21.40188520-9 Type of Petition: Declaration Embargoes Date: 02/12/2021 10:13
]===

Of course it's possible even if this is what we are waiting for there is more to be done before we are ready to announce this and the next steps to the market?

Ob.

LoL! Good point!

Thanks EV_Bull. So potentially a stalling tactic?

Don't know @Barksy. It says "Declaration Embargoes" whatever that means...

I was hoping you could tell me @Cause! LoL Don't think I've seen one of those before...

Movement half an hour ago...

I hadn't realised, or forgotten, that the 3% royalty claim on certain Sonora areas doesn't cover our JV's - see BCN board. :-)))

Thanks @jam. Search for "MSB" here if you are interested: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/BCN/final-results/14443003?lang=en

@r7632: "I don't think royalties were due on the Sonora project.". It's up for debate, that's why it is in court. However:

"Report on Updated and Reclassified Lithium Resources, Sonora Lithium Project" (June 24, 2014)
https://www.bacanoralithium.com/pdfs/Updated-and-Reclassified-Lithium-Resources-Sonora-Lithium-Project.pdf
===[
The concessions making up the Sonora Lithium Project are subject to a 3% gross overriding royalty (“GOR”) to Colin Orr-Ewing.
]===