Member Info for Numptypi

The aviation division is in a rapidly expanding market, without competition, with very high unit prices and additionally the added bonus of recurring revenue, what’s not to like! The regulations hurdle has yet to be achieved, and realistically is some way off, but undoubtedly will be achieved. The regulators desire for cockpit data will enable them to fill( with our technology), a very obvious gap in the information they collect in the black box records. IMHO this will morph into a very lucrative division that has potential to dwarf current expectations.
Numpty

So a new driver black box, with fovio, that qualifies the driver for top insurance discounts and collects additional data for us would be another step forward. Everybody would soon become more accepting and our data collection would grow exponentially.

The arguments for Xilinx are certainly compelling and may very well prove to be correct, but others may have deeper pockets, however...
My personal opinion has always been that ken intends to continue until he has achieved market domination with world class technology accreditation and a highly profitable company saving lives across the world. At that point I can imagine him selling up and walking back to his family with an enormous well earned grin.
So what can we do, well firstly the negativity is not helping our investment, understandable yes but helpful...no. I for one intend to start afresh this week with a glass half full attitude once again, reasons to be cheerful anyone....?

Numpty

Our management knows precisely how disheartened everybody is. Pr has been endlessly discussed yet nothing changes. We can only make our own decisions about why. Perhaps for whatever reason this is how we are supposed to be feeling.

Sorry tbtt, you aren’t alone in needing translation into English. This is why he’s a dr and I am not!

Good points s2020, but there’s also nothing in our sp for the value of...
Nucoria,
Rail, ( Canadian Pacific)
Aviation, ( Qantas, Emirates, etc)
IP,
Data,
And you could argue Future models within Auto also could/should be on this list
Numpty

Sorry S7 but I totally disagree with you. I understand your frustrations, but ken and a team of very smart people have created something with truly global potential. Whilst it’s a bumpy road at the moment, we will get there, and I hope you are still on board.
It’s fair to say comms and pr have room for improvement... and I would also question why we’re not able to publicise good news as well as our bad news. Lots of companies that have never made a profit are still valued for billions and presentation is definitely part of it.
Numpty

Whilst considering this week’s events I’ve been thinking...
What commercial opportunities are there for a very very big hole, that is not only very deep underground but also connected with first class transportation to the ships. Might it be possible for us to get paid for filling in the hole that we will be paid to dig? More importantly is there any possibility to start refilling before we finish digging. Having a constant temperature and humidity environment that’s safer than Fort Knox must be commercially interesting. We might consider high value small volume storage rather than rubbish as the conveyor is hopefully going to be flat out. The Just wondering...
Numpty

Whatif that’s a great find. This type of tie up highlights the monumental amount of potential our technology has. Ultimately it may not be Apple but that’s not the point.
We have proven tech that’s wanted / needed by billions of people and the calibre of our auto contracts underlines this. We have not had a good week and the road ahead will not be pothole free, but that’s the pitfalls of creating a new concept. This is OUR company, and right now a bit of support and positivity would not go amiss.

Numpty

Apologies for signing in late today to our fleet carnage issues, I’ve been busy assessing the carnage of my Sirius Minerals investment. Magic beans anyone, just bought some very cheap!

Numpty

So based on Boeing figures... if Asia needs 240,000 pilots in the next 20 years, this being just over a third of the global requirements, 700,000 worldwide seems reasonable. With circa 16,000 new airliners expected in that timeframe and all flying around in the same airspace as today, all three aspects of our aviation division have got monumental potential that is beyond the wildest comprehension of many, as of yet there is no obvious viable competition that I am aware of, remind me again how much valuation has been attributed to this in today’s sp oh yes zero.
Numpty

In fairness, we (myself included) have been quite vocal in asking for updates, the company or more accurately our company will need to release information when it is most appropriate in attaining the long term goals. If that results in a series of interim announcements then that’s much better than silence.
Meanwhile, to answer a former question, yes I do think strong buy is a fair description, the SIPP is being filled, more top ups are now in place so let spectacular September begin.
Numpty

BBC world services reported that Boeing claim that Asia alone requires 240,000 pilots trained in the next two decades... over to you then pat!

Welcome to a sensible discussion, great to have you onboard
Numpty

Hi everyone, may I ask as a newbie, what is the plan b should the tender be unsuccessful
Numpty

Zequic, that’s a tough one to answer. With 28 member states, one is bound to be late, one is bound to have spurious reasons to argue against the blindingly obvious,and several will raise questions over different areas of the proposal. The point however is that the eu proposal, along with the NTSB and euro ncap statements has shown which direction we are heading, everyone involved is having to prepare and make good use of the time they’ve got. Ultimately it may not make that much difference to us, whatever decision they ultimately arrive at in the European Union.

Numpty

Now way outside of my comfort zone...
https://www.tobiipro.com/fields-of-use/psychology-and-neuroscience/visual-perception/
There are AABR hearing tests ( automated auditory brainstem response) for children, there could be similar eye tests?
Dyslexia, dyspraxia and dyscalculus has visual perception links and it’s necessary to know what precisely a child is looking at in orders to understand how they are processing it.
Someone far better informed than I will need to think about this, but a visitor is giving ideas and I am making notes...

Patients with locked in syndrome or similar loss of communication skills could control their world simply by using the one thing that still works, their eyes. Perhaps this is one for nucoria, another overlooked division that quietly slips along under the radar Numpty

Our tech could be used to help test older drivers, a simulation of various scenarios and an accurate quantifiable result would identify what hasn’t been seen. Just a thought. Numpty

Sebs, you’re not alone in questioning a disproportionately large investment, I do it most weekends but always come to the same conclusion...
Aviation, sp valuation given is currently zero, in three distinct areas namely training, air traffic control and onboard, this division has a very significant contribution to make with a global addressable market and no current competition.
Even If this was the entire company ie without other divisions it would definitely be worth investing in.
Rail, again not a dissimilar situation, the tech is proven the market is large and competition is lacking.and again currently a valuation of zero in our sp, so there’s only upside.
Off road, catapiller are already pushing ahead.
Fleet and auto are making huge progress and regulators are starting to light the path before us.
Kk has been pressing ahead with future development and our data will be invaluable in a myriad of ways,
We will be fine, enjoy your weekend
Numpty