Member Info for notrader

Culpepper - why do you insist on telling us things we already know? Is it an ego thing?

Culpepper - "I refer to RNS for facts. I pointed them out." From previous post:

"Mr Day will have to go to them again ( or issue equity maybe ) when he seeks to fund under the new study, in respect of which Ggp is well-funded, in principle."

Please explain where in the RNS this additional funding, which you present as a certainty, is even mentioned. What is mentioned in the RNS is "Completing the debt facilities and Wyloo investment will enable Greatland to be fully funded for its share of costs in developing the Havieron project into first production"

Freddie - perhaps if you were to write with better syntax and punctuation i would not have inferred that by citing the GH issue in a post addressed to me you were implying that was the source of your upset.

Aaaargh! Heaven help us. Freddie - if you're going to have a rant please make sure you know which thread you're responding to. I have made no comment on the GH non-issue. Apology expected.

Acechaser - pleasen re-read my original post. Nowhere have I even implied I believe 'peppers' is a serial deramper

Last comment. Who were the two previous negative posts from?

serial - a pattern of consistent behaviour

deramper - poster who presents false and/or misleading information about a target company in an attempt to spread doubt and confusion about its operations or prospects.

Acechaser - rather than that, I challenge you to identify any posts by Aim999 positive towards the prospects for GGP. I do not intend to be drawn into a fatuous discussion with you.

Acechaser - if Culpepper leaves the board it would be entirely by his own choice. What other posters have done is call him out for a misleading post which seems deliberately aimed at spreading doubt. He posted "Reading this today, purely some of the posts, it’s as though there is doubting of own investments creeping in again"

There were 24 posts previous to his today, of which 2 were implying negatives for GGP from the NCM update, and both from the same poster who is a serial deramper. By posting this, he is amplifying the lone voice of the deramper. Why would someone who professes to support the company do this? Does the opinion of one deramper really lead him to infer that there is a general doubting by investors?

Benrumpson "Why did Newcrest not take up the 5% option?"

Why waste time and opportunity by asking question he can't give a substantive answer to? If did answer it would be along the lines of 'I have no idea. You would have to ask Newcrest'

Freddie - to help you, fatuous means silly and pointless.

Well done Freddie, you've succeeded in disrupting a thread relevant to the company by picking a fatuous argument. I hope you get paid for your efforts.

If no one bought any shares in a company, the company wouldn't deserve to exist.

It seems Freddie believes that when a PI buys shares, the money goes to the company.

Freddie - my post was entirely in the context of financial benefit to the company, as you'd have known if you'd read the post I was replying to. Please don't try and twist my words to suit your weird agenda.

Freddie - no I didn't say that. Please don't put words in my mouth - it makes you look stupider than you are. If that's possible.

HeresHopin - "They benefit the Board and the new II's at the expense of the PI's who have supported the company to now"

I tell you again - shares issued through options are paid for and the money goes to the company. Shares bought by PIs do not benefit the company - the money goes to whoever sold them. PIs buy shares because they expect to sell them at a later date to make themselves a profit.

HeresHopin - when they take up the options, the money paid goes to the company. "buying the shares like normal PI's" it doesn't.

And you say Shaun has caused "a massive amount of dilution and now handed out stacks of free options"
- as pointed out to your mate Everyonesawinner, they are not free.
- define 'massive dilution'
- it's not dilution if it secures an equal or greater value in assets. We are now fully funded to production, plus the ability to explore other 100% owned tenements.

HeresHopin you go back to your other discussion boards.

Everyone - a perfect example of why nobody should pay any attention to you. How is it possible for you to write "giving these fantastic new board members the free shares" It is obvious to everyone else that they have to be paid for. If your objection is to0 the low price, then I would just point out that you have a great opportunity to buy some yourself at a significantly lower price than they will pay. You make no sense.

Everyonesawinner - I think your telling trumpies

Everyonesawinner obviously resorting to desperation to try and talk down the company-making news.