Member Info for Notforalongtime

Not at all Black dog. I go off of 1 litre is 1 kg but that's water. Is it all petroleum or aviation fuel only?

https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/korea-worlds-first-5-ton-hydrogen-garbage-truck-goes-into-service-in-changwon/

Thats about 217 miles or there about. That's surely not bad, and it's the first so could be refined further.

At first my thoughts where "Well, 25kg is a fair bit of weight" but that's the same as 25 litres of diesel or petrol weight wise (long morning watching a baby lol) I think you may get better on petrol or diesel however, after a few years of advancing the tech that's going to easily close the gap. Plus, removing waste from the earth. Definate winner this I feel.

Being researched in Germany, but an interesting idea:

https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/salt-caverns-store-hydrogen-for-the-mobility-revolution /

Lol you've been missed yellow. Whenever you predict lower numbers you drive the SP up buddy. Merry Christmas and a happy new year

Smilley regards trades at pence levels, a lot may be traders like myself. We use platforms such as 212 to avoid fees which would hamstring us. We don't have a few grand to place regularly, so at times it may be20, 30 even 40 pound to just buy little and often.

I am sorry, as I understand to lobg term serious investors this may be frustrating. But it's not to manipulate its just - in my case at least - buying what I can realistically afford to hold for the future. Sorry if it is an inconvenience.

Kalg the misunderstanding here is what is your motivation I would guess. I'm not always clear and chat board don't help but I'll try and be clear.

To our understanding you're not invested in PHE. You have looked at it but decided against it. Which is fine. At this stage I would walk away - I think as most would - as what's driving the SP does not interest me. Why would it, I'm not going to invest? But you have decided to question it on the board.

Now, arguments sake it is just for understanding. This is fine. I - as a complete newbie to trading - have posted the odd question here for clarification. I needed it. You have been investing for years. So why would you need clarification for a sudden SP drive? It's down to demand surely? (wether that's ramping or otherwise is completely irrelevant if you've not invested and are not going to) so why remain to query it?

Kenny has posted numerous links and articles all available on the open Web. He brings it here and always follows up with DYOR. He has also repeatedly said to different board members to make their own mind up. He doesn't ramp in a way any of us recognise it. Can you. Explain how you feel he is ramping by sharing independent material?

And as I said it comes back to a general feeling of why bother on this page? And now, this time? We've had issues before with deramping attempts on here. Numerous times and usually just after a price hike. So if you are an innocent interested bystander we are sorry if you've received a broadside for no reason buddy. Truly. But can you see from our perspective why it appears odd to want to ask for advice on an SP sudden rise when you have no interest, and why you are lookin for a debate on a subject which has no real point? Regards

Right. No that does. But why does it bother you? Are you invested? Are you looking to invest? If not, why does it bother you? It's not your money, and it won't be.

Kalg. Please, I've asked nicely. Can you not answer my earlier questions?

If not it does lend wait to the thought process on here that you're trying to drive down the SP.

I don't see the issue with 212. Without it I'd never of started trading. Not everyone is lucky enough to have thousands or even hundreds to throw at stocks and shares. The fact it is commission free is an opening for more people to have a chance to trade.
I understand it must be frustrating for those who have more money to invest but some of us just don't have those means, but also wish to trade. Example, I bought into this and powerhouse (PHE) A t low levels to hold. PHE has come in I'm waiting for this. But I would never have done it if some one was charging me a commission.

I cannot lie this last couple weeks I been laughing my head off thanks to Oz.

Was it last week when he predicted an SP and there was some good natured questioning of it. Bang he was right. Today earlier he predicted we should be 5p a share realistically and the SP chased it.

All I'm asking for Oz is would you be nice enough to call it say... 50p by next week? Do it for the PI's lol

Hello Jack, I like the SWOT usage. Reminds me of work and it's a good principle to use.

S: currently at half a million pound per year per unit, and depending on figure a conservative of at least ten sites within the UK, that's a minimum of £5M a year from license alone. (Please other senior board members correct me if wrong)
Thats just with Peel but when the technology is proven, the license may go up for other companies. PHE has also just signed a contract with a Polish company. This gives us a foot in Europe and with it a chance to showcase effectively. PHE system also offers an extremely clean way or producing hydrogen that most competitors do not offer or replicate. All in all its a strong position in a world where people are becoming more aware.

W: So far PHE has been a bit of a minnow in a big pond. As for my own thoughts we have trailed not technologically as such but on an awareness and public promotion front we seem to be behind other companies. We have categorically not missed the ship however it will mean proving itself a bit more. On that front the technology has been independently approved (Kenny, Blue or Dr. A can give more info on that no doubt if asked) but long and short of it is, yes the tech work in theory but until its up and running fully there will be naysayers. (Again my own opinion, would peel be so committed if they felt there was risk?) however it is a weakness not to be running yet.

O: well they're countless really. Once the main sites are up and running what's to stop steady expansion? Certain countries and areas already have their own hydrogen plants but my understanding is its not as green. And some cannot use as much feed as PHE can. This reduces their capabilites. IMHO gold standard would be getting other countries to pay us to take their waste. We would then turn it to hydrogen (generating eletric in same process) and in doing so power our local communities. We then sell the Hydrogen back to the countries for vehicle and power use etc. For job creation and income alone, it would be amazing. Obviously its just my thoughts but it's one that makes me think of opportunity. There was talk of expansion into Asia also and Japan but that was all on board so would need to review that information yourself. However as a clean company processing Hydrogen we will be desirable.

T: as mentioned above were not the most obvious choice even with the potential we have on offer. There's a lot of other companies offering green alternatives that are a threat. And some are more advanced. Also with wind and battery as well as solar and tidal always pushing to the front, it will take a strong PR team to push us forwards. Also with Giants like Shell and BP going green, they will dictate to an extent what's used I believe. If they go down the battery route will hydrogen get overlooked? Another drama is EVs have been driven largely by Tesla. And due to this battery power has developed at a mental

Lol. Had to wonder Mark thought was wrong forum.

I am naive to all this but I believe over long term ten to fifteen years we will be comfortably in pounds if not approaching double digits. Maybe a pipe dream but I can dream ??

Hello Northern. I notice 212 is a nightmare at times. I like it - it got me into trading and I'm loving my choices so far but AIM companies seem slow to buy on their system. I am buying PHE as well and they can be delayed at times. Though, not sure why. But it predominantly seems to be AIM companies.

Pedro although I agree with some of your thoughts I would say let's just watch it unfold. Yes HUI is not considered blue chip. However it has got us a foot into Europe.
Regarding the behind the scenes relationships and probable secret handshakes and the such, again I wouldn't be too bothered. I'm only very very new to understanding trading and business, but back scratching and private favours etc are a mainstay throughout history. Yes, it does sit a bit uncomfortably. But again, it may be a way to open ourselves up to bigger and better offers. Besides which I'm sure if there where any real major issues or concerns the Board would of acted or members here would be raising them alongside yourself.

However, very good eye for detail mate and good effort digging and retaining that information.

I think we should encourage yellow far more. As mentioned when he posts it usually is followed by a slight price raise. Maybe not longterm but its there.
Anyhow, I was originally suprised by the News about DR. I joined late so his was the face I knew from outset, and I'd read his history and it was pretty powerful reading. His team had decades and decades of experience combined. So it was positive.

However as much as I appreciated his front man style, as others fairly he was not really a great choice. However, I am relieved by the news - and it makes sense - that he is going back to what he does best. That is, dealing with the technical side again. Leave PR to others, he can do what he specialises in.

Ghengis I noticed that with the petition it gives a chance to alert your local MP that you've signed a petition. In Fife I checked and my local MP. I'm thinking if I link both these schemes to her it may be of interest, especially if name dropping PHE.

Done also. I hope this works. I think the drama is people like Musk have so much power and awareness that the public and parliament are all over battery cars without looking at hydrogen. It's an almost blinkered approach even though - IMHO - hydrogen is probably superior and especially a company like PHE where its a double win as they remove waste.

Anyway sorry for mini rant. All signed mucker

Dr A as a new shareholder and not very trader minded I'd appreciate it if you did not dissappear. You have an ability to find and extract relevant, up to date and factual information and disseminate it to the board in an easy to understand manner that I really appreciate. I take note there's a lot of new members getting involved like myself and we all appreciate the information given as it gives us a base of understanding to develop from. From both yourself and many others on here who provide and solid, reliable core.

Don't be put off by others points of views. Stick with it mucker.

@Carefulbunny so reference your post realistically Yeo would not be able to do anything that would affect chare holders drastically?

Don't get me wrong I'm holding still, and after reading up on the board months ago and their combined experience I was happy with Dave but if hes better placed in another part that makes sense. Play your team to their individual strengths.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but maybe Yellow has a point?

Wasn't there a scandal with Yeo when he was a minister or am I confusing him with someone else? And if so is there scope he may try to shaft the company?