The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Pedro although I agree with some of your thoughts I would say let's just watch it unfold. Yes HUI is not considered blue chip. However it has got us a foot into Europe.
Regarding the behind the scenes relationships and probable secret handshakes and the such, again I wouldn't be too bothered. I'm only very very new to understanding trading and business, but back scratching and private favours etc are a mainstay throughout history. Yes, it does sit a bit uncomfortably. But again, it may be a way to open ourselves up to bigger and better offers. Besides which I'm sure if there where any real major issues or concerns the Board would of acted or members here would be raising them alongside yourself.
However, very good eye for detail mate and good effort digging and retaining that information.
I think we should encourage yellow far more. As mentioned when he posts it usually is followed by a slight price raise. Maybe not longterm but its there.
Anyhow, I was originally suprised by the News about DR. I joined late so his was the face I knew from outset, and I'd read his history and it was pretty powerful reading. His team had decades and decades of experience combined. So it was positive.
However as much as I appreciated his front man style, as others fairly he was not really a great choice. However, I am relieved by the news - and it makes sense - that he is going back to what he does best. That is, dealing with the technical side again. Leave PR to others, he can do what he specialises in.
Ghengis I noticed that with the petition it gives a chance to alert your local MP that you've signed a petition. In Fife I checked and my local MP. I'm thinking if I link both these schemes to her it may be of interest, especially if name dropping PHE.
Done also. I hope this works. I think the drama is people like Musk have so much power and awareness that the public and parliament are all over battery cars without looking at hydrogen. It's an almost blinkered approach even though - IMHO - hydrogen is probably superior and especially a company like PHE where its a double win as they remove waste.
Anyway sorry for mini rant. All signed mucker
Dr A as a new shareholder and not very trader minded I'd appreciate it if you did not dissappear. You have an ability to find and extract relevant, up to date and factual information and disseminate it to the board in an easy to understand manner that I really appreciate. I take note there's a lot of new members getting involved like myself and we all appreciate the information given as it gives us a base of understanding to develop from. From both yourself and many others on here who provide and solid, reliable core.
Don't be put off by others points of views. Stick with it mucker.
@Carefulbunny so reference your post realistically Yeo would not be able to do anything that would affect chare holders drastically?
Don't get me wrong I'm holding still, and after reading up on the board months ago and their combined experience I was happy with Dave but if hes better placed in another part that makes sense. Play your team to their individual strengths.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but maybe Yellow has a point?
Wasn't there a scandal with Yeo when he was a minister or am I confusing him with someone else? And if so is there scope he may try to shaft the company?
Sharenewb and Yacht master thank you both for the help and explanations. It makes a lot more sense now. Cheers both. And I promise to do more reading for the future.
Again thank you both for taking time to explain to me. Hopefully - touch wood - this does go high in 5-10 and I can get my family a good future. GLA
Shareneeb re Tesla that would give each share a price of about £460 if I'm doing maths correctly?
But i think then there was some confusion. So with PHE and it's shares - I'm probably not being very clear - do the SP drive up the Mcap? So argument sake you had a company with 100 shares, each share worth £1 it's Mcap is then £100. If the SP went up to £1.50 a share the cap is then £150?
Or is that not how it works and have I got confused. If that is the case though, is there a point where you can predict roughly a reasonable Mcap?
*hanging head in sham* I can't lie I don't have clue. I literally started trading in May, so this for pennies so bought a few. My returns over most my stocks are OK - currently 11% overall - but I won't have lie SP and stuff confuse me as does market cap etc
Sorry Sprog I too am not great at this. If there is 3.7 B shares on the go, surely it'll cap the SP at some level? For example is the SP went up to even £2 a share that's going to give the company value of 7.4 billion. Or an I very confused? Ws
Sorry Sprog I too am not great at this. If there is 3.7 B shares on the go, surely it'll cap the SP at some level? For example is the SP went up to even £2 a share that's going to give the company value of 7.4 billion. Or an I very confused?
As always a great find and loaded with info. Thank you especially for the video link. I still am clueless as to how they work the charts but will spend Xmas leave having a play around.
In the interim though again thank you for that ??
I find generally Yellow does not contribute. I unmutes him out of mild interest - as BlueToff rightly stated it can help to have an opposing opinion so decided to see what Yellow was saying. I am afraid he has made one relatively useful comment in the last few I've read of his. But even then it would be rather easily debated. He turns then to insult and attacking others intellect. So unfortunately I feel ill need to mute him again.
You don't have to agree with everyone's view. And I definately don't. I am a low paid job. I'm in the armed forces. So to supplement my wage I decided to try invest for the long term.
And I see so much useful information here at times. And we HAVE a resident board member who does remind us to be realistic in our expectations at times but with facts or using experience - BlueToff.
Yellow rather unfortunately does not offer much I personally feel. And as a low key investor I understand how he could - if I listened to him - have cost me a fortune by now.
It's up to everyone I dividually I guess. If you generally think he brings strength and decent counter to the party, keep reading his messages and posts. If you don't, just ignore him or mute him. What I would ask though is simply this; why is he still here? He obviously feels this is a failed company, with little hope or prospects. If I where him I'd cut my losses and leave the board and concentrate on where I am invested. So why does he remain? Why the remaining unless there is another agenda? I don't know. But I'd be wary of him personally.
Regarding Britain's newest trade deal with Japan and its bringing an opportunity to expand to other Pacific countries, I have to say surely this is a positive jump and has potential for Peel and PHE? Especially with Japan's hydrogen projects? Obviously if anyone has an opinion or differing thoughts keen to hear them but I for one see this as a positive step
Bit rich to be complaining about others chat names while you use one yourself to be honest. We all use pseudonyms.
Just because someone uses Dr does not in any way shape or form imply they are one. I mean Dr Chaos is Butters (I like the reference myself). Plus as we see from DrAnomalies posts he is constructive, offers well thought out and balanced arguments and provides evidence and links to support his theories. He or she may not be a doctor but is offering evidence for his theories.
But regardless of all that, to hide behind a name yourself and then complain others do the same - regardless of the reasons - is highly hypocritical surely? "Hello teapot this is the kettle... My you look a bit off shade today" ??
A good find slow roll. I'd seen this in the news but I am of the same view as Carefulbunny. Although I am not fully understanding all the ins and outs of the different process out there, I feel this does not completely remove all the waste issues as PHE proposed process would. Though I meay be wrong, I think this is a quick fix which only partially resolves the situation of waste as well as hydrogen processing.
Cheers Stokey it makes more sense now. Thank you for your time
As always thank you for the advice Stokey.
In your opinion, do you think that having ITM on the council could actually negatively impact on PHE? Have you seen cases or heard of similar before? And if it does, what's the best case/worse case scenario theoretically?
I know it's a big ask, just looking to pick your brains. Cheers
Jabberba off topic however I did feel need to say, there is zero link or evidence of link regarding any immunisation or jabs and autism. That's not prrof offered up by pharmaceutical companies either, it's by doctors who have studied Autism.
The drama is the report that suggested a link - even though it has been rubbished and the originator has since retracted it - gathered such strength and force that now its stuck in the public domain. This also leads to many parents refusing other medications and an appreciable rise in infant mortality and illness which can be cancelled out by a simple injection.
The reason for the noticable rise in Autism, ADHD and other disorders are that children that where once put aside as 'troublesome' or 'unruly' etc are now being diagnosed correctly. It just happens that these medical breakthroughs coincide with others - such as updated and more efficient immunisation drugs.
IMO if a child contracted an illness and dies because a parent refused to get an immunisation the parent is culpable for manslaughter at best. And as I've always said I'd rather my son had an injection and developed autism rather than dying because I'd rather he didn't risk autism.
Sorry all anyway for step away from PHE stuff. I just truly can't fathom why people would refuse to protect their children. ?? Up there with flat earthers.