Member Info for NoelShempsky

Two buys of 250,00 shares.

Regarding my post about QFI's fuel and the environment - To be fair and balanced, I need to add something to my remark of "there is plenty of motive for making up a hoax theory".

I am not saying that everyone who pushes the global warming agenda is a liar. There are many who truly believe in MMGW, but in my view, that is because they have not read the evidence that exposes MMGW as a hoax, or, sadly, they are too bigotted and won't read it.

It is no wonder that most people have not read the evidence that exposes MMGW as a hoax, as the MSM supresses the data and I think Google is censoring the debate on global warming. I did a few searches and the top results from Google were all pro-MMGW. The top articles were from peole such as George Monbiot, a leading warmist, but none by Christopher Booker or James Delingpole who have written many articles exposing the misinformation

"Google Part of the Deep State"
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/08/29/google-part-of-the-deep-state/

"Leaked Google Internal Memo Reveals Google Has Decided to Deep-Six Free Speech"
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/10/19/leaked-google-internal-memo-reveals-google-has-decided-to-deep-six-free-speech/"

Oil companies are attacked by green activists for the harm they do to the environment. so as investors in QFI, should we feel guilty?

I say not.

Think about motive. We all live on Earth and want to survive and want our children to survive, and most people care about wildlife and want animals to survive, so why would anyone falsify evidence to deny MMGW theory and object to anything being done to save the planet?

There is no motive, but there is plenty of motive for making up a hoax theory that MMGW is killing the planet.

How much has Al Gore made out of it? A fortune.

In Britain, politicians who have promoted the green agenda in parliament have made money from green companies. I have read of plenty of MPs and Lords who are paid consultants to some green energy business or on the board of directors of a company in the environmental field or green energy business. They give speeches in parliament and push through measures that cost us, the public, money, but they put money into the business to which they have a connection.

How many politicians, even with no connection to environmental firms, have used climate change as the reason to demand more new taxes - politicians love new taxes. However, I do agree with plastic bag levy, but that isn't about global warming.

The motive is there to push MMGW but the only motive for denying it is to let the world hear the truth and end the hoax.

Are you old enough to remember Johnny Ball? He used to present BBC science programmes for children. He explained science in an informative and entertaining way.

If you are too young to remember him, then you must have been one of the schoolchildren he talks about here, so I ask you to listen to Johnny Ball and then ask yourself if you were brainwashed in school.

"Johnny Ball - Climate Change Lies"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZRh1fP1EpU

"Johnny Ball - Politicised Science Brainwashing our Young"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZoZ_GwaR74

So on that basis, that MMGW is a lie, we need not feel guilty.

Sadly, the cyber security market has new opportunities opening up all the time -

"Nokia's Threat Intelligence Report 2019 warns on the fast-growing and evolving threat of malicious software targeting Internet of Things (IoT) devices"

https://www.investegate.co.uk/nokia-corporation--0haf-/gnw/nokia-s-threat-intelligence-report-2019-warns-on-the-fast-growing-and-evolving-threat-of-malicious-software-targeting-internet-of-things--iot--devices/20181204160012H7710/

Can Falanx move in on Internet of Things?

To whoever called us numpties - you are right. This has taken the board so I have posted my last message on MMGW.

More free publicity -

"Quora discovers huge data breach which compromised 100 million users' emails, encrypted passwords and names"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6457407/Quora-says-100-mln-users-hit-security-breach.html

"Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules" see -

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

Even if you can't find Monckton credible, then watch those talks by that leading physicist, a Nobel laureate - an eminent and greatly respected scientist. He explains how the warmist scientists produce fake data.

About 10,000 to 15,000 years ago, the last ice age ended. The ice receded because the world warmed up and the world then had a very low human population and no coal or oil powered power stations. The climate does change but it is natural.

Iantobach, I would like reiterate what I said to Blackwash, thank you for taking the time to do all that typing .

I appreciate you keeping us informed.

Just count how many news items like this that have come out in the last month. With the publicity of these big names getting hit, the phones in Falanx's sales department must be red hot.

"Colossal' hack hits world's biggest hotel chain as Marriott reveals credit card and passport numbers of 500 million guests may have been exposed"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6446519/Marriott-admits-details-500-million-guests-stolen-hack.html

You are so predictable Dibs.

Thank you for taking the time to do all that typing Blackwash.

Much appreciated.

Silence from Hawkhead. I wonder why.

The climate does change, but due to the sun not to mankind.

Here is a Nobel Prizewinner for Physics saying that the "facts" which the alarmists tell us, they are not true.

"Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience" " - Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

"Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

Who said "Totally agree. MSAR is junk, nobody wants it. QFI is worth zero." AkzoNobel (now doing business as Nouryon) doesn't seem to think so.

RNS out - I like this bit

"Quadrise Fuels International plc (AIM: QFI) is pleased to announce it has extended the contracts for the exclusive supply of goods and services and joint development for future MSAR® projects with AkzoNobel for a further year to November 2019, at which time the parties intend to enter into a new three-year exclusive global cooperation and supply agreement with new Nouryon legal entities that will be established during 2019."

and -

"Mike Kirk, Executive Chairman of QFI, said: "The extension of these contracts with our core technology partner, AkzoNobel (now doing business as Nouryon), reinforces the commitment of both parties to commercialising the global MSAR® business"

Apology to FK1. That was a case of hitting the keyboard before I put my brain into gear. I accept that you meant to be humourous.

I mean this as a sincere apology.

Well said MrDribbles, and look up Charles Hollis. I was impressed by his connection to The Ditchley Foundation, just look at the names of the people involved with that.

Humourous - yeah, right! You are shameless.

13thmonkey - don't waste your time trying to have a debate with him. He isn't interested in reasoned debate.

His crowing about a drop below 4p was pathetic. I almost posted to say what you have said - nothing rises in a straight line and there always will be dips on the way up - but I thought I needn't bother, because I knew that others on here would, like me, see that posting as making him look a fool.

When this is 11p, he will be saying that it is only temporary and will soon be back under 10p, and the same at 16p - "Soon be back under 15p".

He will still be saying that he got it right with the drop from 54p, but he will keep quiet about saying, as he did a week or two ago, that this won't hold above 2.5p. I would like to say that he said it would drop to a penny, but I have to hold back on that because that might have been his chum, Dibbs, who wrote it.

As dodgepot asked of FK1 "What is your input on this board all about....?" I think we all know the answer to that one and, in my opinion, it isn't polite and reasoned debate. When anyone posts a positive opinion and backed by facts, as MrDribbles has, FK1 resorts to mockery and abuse, albeit only mildly abusive, but later he will deny that he posts those sort of things and he accuses others of not wanting to talk about facts. I see him as a total hypocrite and that Bump under 4p positng of his must have destroyed any credibilty that he might have had in the eyes of anyone who is new to this board.

Just wait until FLX announces that it is getting a chunk of this, which I see as highly likely -

Government spokesman - "we are investing £1.9 billion to improve our cyber capabilities"

"Britain’s cyber security bolstered by world-class strategy"
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/britains-cyber-security-bolstered-by-world-class-strategy.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/567242/national_cyber_security_strategy_2016.pdf Note - "the Government alone cannot provide for all aspects of the nation’s cyber security" - page 13.