Member Info for NoelShempsky

I'm pleased to see that you are not taking it too seriously GLR1990.

NiceToMichu did and now he's scuttled off. It's a pity. He should have lightened up a bit.

No one should take this silly bun fight seriously. I tried to lighten it up with a bit of humour with my joke about The Tanned Todger (a sarcastic dig at the trend for changing traditional pub names to silly ones. Does it go on in your part of the country?) but it didn't work.

I am losing a lot of money, but I take it philosophically.

There are thousands of people in hospitals, hospices and at home who would love it if their biggest problem was losing money on some shares.

They have had to face up to real problems and in situations like that, people think about life and what really matters and everyone, everyone!, comes to the conclusion that money is not the most important thing in life.

So long as you have a roof over your head, clothes to wear and food to eat, anything else is a bonus.

NiceToMichu should have picked a side. He thought he could sit in No Man's Land and dodge the bullets but you can't - you get caught in the crossfire, as he learned.

I'm taking a roll call - I think this board has four in the ring in a tag match, with one more, MrDribbles, skulking in a corner and coming out only now and then, and one ring-side observer, GLR1990, so this board has six people. Wow - as influential as a G7 meeting.

Slimeball tells us that "If the numbers are okay and the outlook is positive there is money to be made from the current level".

What insight, what brilliant deduction - he is saying that if it turns out all right and the share price goes up, buyers at this level will make money. why didn't I think of that?

He must be a genius. No wonder the worms backs him up and creeps to him.

Another quote of the slimeball - "My best guess about what is happening now is ".

so he has admitted that is view is nothing more than guesswork.

Come on worm - demand that he substantiates his forecasts \ criticise him for not substantiating his forecasts.

The slimeball wrote - "Impossible to have a civil discussion with them without it turning into a slanging match." Of all the brazen, two-faced, slimey hypocrites this takes the biscuit.

Look back on here to see who kicked off the slanging match - the first to resort to insults and abuse was the slimeball, unfairview. The evidence is there..

As for "Impossible to have a civil discussion - how do you gave a discussion with someone who will say one thing one day then say the opposite and deny what he first said. E.g. "Well one thing I would say about this company is that whatever happens now they have let investors down badly. You can't say results end of July/beginning of August and then nothing." - but he said that the delay in the results didn't matter, and now he comes out with this.

The worm wrote - "Whilst your [FK's] forecasting has been very much, in the main accurate, I don’t believe you have provided concrete info to substantiate the same"

The forecasts were correct. That in itself substantiates them. No other substantiation is needed.

You are just trying to wriggle out of your position, thus increasing the justification for calling you a worm.

Note - "tripe" and -

- "a rant from a very unstable box" and -

- "opinions without a figment of substance"

and whose opinion turned out to be right.

I am suffeirng badly from the HUGE fall in the FLX share price, but I am not in denial, not a slimball hypocrite or a slimeball liar and I face up to the truth of the situation and give credit where credit is due.

Ignore FK1 at your peril. I learned that the hard way.

... and grow a pair.

Re - "NS please tone down the language about others you use in your posting"

NicetoMichu - take a look back to the start of this spat and see who started the name calling and rudeness. I don't recall you giving a rebuke to the culprits, but now that I put up a robust defence (pointing out their misrepsentation of my, and FK1's words), you start on me.

If you can't stand a bit of blunt talk, you need to toughen up a bit, grow a thicker skin and stop being a snowflake.

Have a go at the aggressors not someone who is just fighting back against scurrilous remarks.

Anyone who is new to the board might have got the wrong idea about me (however I do suspect that not more than ten or twelve people read this board, so what does it matter?)

I am an FLX bull. I want it to go up, and up a lot.

Regarding the recent comment about the new office in Reading. I agree that it appears to be positive news. In theory it should be positive news, and in my days of wearing rose-tinted specs, it is the sort of news that sucked me in deeper and deeper so that I now have a holding that is an insanely large percentage of my total portfolio.

I used to argue with FK1 telling him that he had it wrong and I used to point to all the good news in their announcements as evidence that I was right. Does that remind you of anyone (hint - he is slimey, i.e. won't stand by things he said, he makes contradictory statements and he won't answer questions)

I want it to go up. I need it to go up, but FK1 was always rught and I was ignoring worrying signs such as saying four weeks but things not happening as forecasted.

The clues were there, but I preferred to stick to my blinkered opinion.

I saw the light, far too late really, but how long will it take the slimeball to see the light?

Thank you MatthewC.

OMG - in that case I see 0.75p soon.

They say "No news is good news" - not in the case of FLX.

I previously said that if the results were bad, we could see 1.2p, and later 0.75p.

It looks as though 1.2p might happen even without bad results being issued - and the slimeball said that the delay in releasing the results didn't matter.

Who would you rather follow - someone who has been consistantly right or someone who knows nothing? FK1's track record speaks for itself.

The slimeball says he bought in at 1.6p. He can now see the wisdom in my advice of "Don't buy until FK advises that it is safe to do so". I learned that the hard way.

The slimeball is, by his own words, proved to be either a liar or a hypocrite (probably both) and therefore not someone who can be relied on for worthwhile advice, best ignored in fact, but see GLR1990's post at 17:28 - GLR1990 seems to have let himself be taken in by quackery.

Come on unfairview, what did you mean by "followed"?

If you mean "followed" as a shareholder, i.e. you did buy a long time ago, then you are underwater - something you denied, so your words prove you to be a liar.

If you didn't buy, then it means that you thought that the sp was going to fall - i.e. you agreed with FK1 - but you now attack him for his point of view so you are a hypocrite.

Like you said FK - mindset.

The low-life is squirming. He knows you are right, but he cannot bring himself to admit it so he is churning out drivel to hide his embarrasment.

Expect more drivel soon from his toady sidekick, the schoolgirl with the giggles, the worm.

After the results do come out, will the directors pile in and snap up shares at "bargain" prices?

"FK! It's not getting boring, no substance to your guesswork" - I call this latest drop, "substance", so this is another delusional comment from the worm.

"Please stop the personal attacks" "request an end to personal abuse" - that would be good, but unfairview suddenly appeared on here and very quickly launched into unprovoked, abusive attacks on FK1.

People like shouldn't be allowed to get away with their bullying. No appeasement.

I've just been reading an article (not about shares or investing) by a US professor, ex-associate editor of The Wall street Journal, author of many books and ex-US Assistant Treasury Secretary.

This section applies to the worm and the slimeball -

Emotional responses are gradually crowding out fact and evidence based reason. Truth is losing its connection to objectivity and is becoming agenda based. If it serves the agenda, and agendas are increasingly emotion based, it is truth. Many can no longer comprehend the content of what they read. Words become like a bullfighter’s red cape. They set off emotions, not thought. Depending on how people have been programmed by their education, indoctrination, and value inculcation, they have emotive responses. One consequence is that discussion is replaced by denunciation.

From - https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/28/in-america-emotion-rules-reason/

We have to suspect that a lack of cognitive ability means that they cannot understand the sensible posts from FK1 and myself, and that is the reason why they spew out such rubbish.

Come on unfairview, what did you mean by "followed"?

If you mean "followed" as a shareholder, i.e. you did buy a long time ago, then you are underwater - something you denied, so your words prove you to be a liar.

If you didn't buy, then it means that you thought that the sp was going to fall - i.e. you agreed with FK1 - but you now attack him for his point of view so you are a hypocrite.

I'm sure that all readers of this board who are watching from the sidelines and not involved in this battle have noticed how FK1 has always been polite and fair in his replies. Unlike his detractors, he has never resorted to name-calling nor the slightest bit of rudeness. His dignified responses are a sign of a man of integrity. Sadly, I do not exist on that lofty plain on which FK1 sits, and I have resorted to insults, but bystanders will have noticed that, unlike the worm and the slimeball, I use insults only when they are deserved.

I suspect that there are no more than ten people who actually read this board, so that doesn't leave many bystanders.