Member Info for NoelShempsky

eshaitan = e - shaitan

https://www.yourdictionary.com/shaitan

You are a fan of Satan, eshaitan. Interesting!

Thank you for that post unfairview - such brilliant analysis and insight.

Now, rather than stating the bleeding obvious, tell us what we really want to know - what did you mean by "followed"?

Ignore FK1 at your peril.

I learned that the hard way.

Come on unfairview - what did you mean by "followed"?

There are two possibilities, and one proves you a liar and the other proves you to be a hypocrite.

You said you "followed" FLX, so let us know what you meant by "followed".

Regarding taking it private - in one video interview, Mike Read talked of selling Falanx and he alluded to a figure of £300 million.

Does anyone recall that figure being mentioned?

Thank you for the information Hurst10.

However, the way you have expressed this is misleading - "2000 MSP’s will generate £400,000 per month"

If I recall the FLX statement on that point - they hope to get a certain number of clients from the SolarWinds deal. Saying "will" makes it sound certain, well, to me it does.

To say "will generate £400,000 per month" might create the wrong impression in anyone who wasn't aware of the distinction between "will" and hoping to.

I hope they get \ have got many more clients that hoped for.

Today's wishful thinking - The results have been delayed due to negotiations taking place and they hope to announce, along with the results, a monster deal that sends the sp to 10p.

Come on unfairview - what did you mean by "followed"?

ECSC results - "results for the six months ended 30 June 2019" - not 31 March!

"Unaudited results for the six months ended 30 June 2019
and current trading update

... [figures] ...

David Mathewson, Non-Executive Chairman, commented:

"Since period end, the return to profit, positive cash flow, and strong Q3/4 outlook are testament to the continued improvements across the business. The recent release of the first significant GDPR related cyber security breach fines highlights the continued need for ECSC's proven expertise and long-established services which is now showing in our current trading.""

https://www.investegate.co.uk/ecsc-group-plc--ecsc-/rns/interim-results/201909110700038934L/

Sorry - that should have been "Thanks GLR1990" - for the information about the META data.

Thanks FK.

I wonder why they removed it?

I'm looking forward to our party when the results come out.

This was the page that Google took me to and where I got the "Page not found message".

https://falanx.com/launch-party/

I searched using "Falanx expands in Reading".

This appeared in the search results -

"Falanx celebrate office expansion with launch party - Falanx
https://falanx.com › launch-party"

but when I clicked on it, I got "Page not found".

So they have had a party. How much did that cost?

We are in ADS. How much does that cost and what has it done for us? Just a question.

Falanx Cyber Holdings Limited
https://www.adsgroup.org.uk/members/falanx-cyber-holdings-limited/

In previous posts, I said that I thought that Crossword Cybersecurity's Rizikon Assurance 2.0 gave Crossword a huge advantage over Falanx.

I had forgotten about Falanx's Project Furnace (and no one reminded me about it. I post on here to stimulate discussion, but failed on that one.)

"Project Furnace is the evolution of Falanx's investment in the creation of a highly capable technology stack. Furnace allows users to span the rapidly growing array of public and private Cloud, currently used by enterprise. By exploiting our many years of SOC (Security Operations Centre) experience, we have built a best of breed microservice architecture to provide enterprise and their in-house developers the tools to plug dangerous security gaps that have emerged during the rapid proliferation of Cloud. Built from best of breed components, technology acquired as part of the Cloudified acquisition and our proprietary service architecture MidGARD, Project Furnace has reached a level of maturity whereby an opportunity now exists to replace large-scale proprietary application stacks. Our aim is to offer enterprise the output of Project Furnace to assist them in improving performance, visibility of risks and greatly reducing costs regardless of the location or type of data."

So the people at Falanx are not sitting idly by - they are developing a rival system.

However, Crossword has released several updates about milestones in the progress of Rizikon. It seems to be a success.

The lack of similar announcements from FLX about Project Furnace has me worried. Is it a flop? Does it have flaws? Has it gone way over budget and the cost of removing flaws is going to be huge?

Have they delayed the results in the hope that the flaws (which might not exist!) can be ironed out, so that they don't have to say that another x million will be needed to make it work?

Please let me know if there has been an announcement about successful testing, or even a rollout, that I missed.

If they can tell TW why the results have been delayed, why don't they tell all of us? Perhaps it doesn't demand and RNS anncouncement, but it could be on their web site.

What did they say in last year's results - "We have reworked our website to position it for future growth and giving us increased dexterity in the way in which we communicate with all our stakeholders online."

Communicate? FLX seems to agree with Homer Simpson. In one episode he said, "Communication, that's the problem with the world today. There's too much communication."

On Wednesday my upbeat and optimisitic posts pushed the sp up :-) then yesterday my negative posts pushed it down, so let's see if I can talk it up again today.

"Annual Results for the Year-Ended 31 March 2018

...

Outlook

The Board has received favourable indications from our most significant partners and vendors that our strategy to scale our security services is appropriate and will be supported. As such, the Board targets a much-improved financial performance for this year. In addition to our 'business as usual' plan which combines organic growth and targeted acquisitions that are financially attractive, the Group will:

· Increase the contribution from high quality recurring revenues

· Increase average customer spend through bundled products

· Increase sales by distributing through large Managed Service Providers (MSPs)

· Utilise proprietary technology development to drive down cost and add attractive new features

· Progress current discussions with several major global enterprises for adoption of our highly disruptive cyber technology stack

..." From -

https://www.investegate.co.uk/falanx-group-limited/rns/annual-results-for-the-year-ended-31-march-2018/201808140700046720X/

There - what an impressive list. How can you argue with that, and there is Project Furnace - don't forget Project Furnace.

Also in that announcement -- "We have reworked our website to position it for future growth and giving us increased dexterity in the way in which we communicate with all our stakeholders online." See - they do communicate with us. If we feel that we are left in the dark, it must be our fault for not being able to find the information on their web site.

Now it has jumped to 914.

I can't believe it.

The site was showing that I had made 911 posts, and as soon as I posted that last one below, it changed to 907 posts.

What is going on?

Totally O/T, but since this site is showing that I have made 911 posts -

"The Official Story of the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Lies in Ruins

A research team at the University of Alaska’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, led by Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao, Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, released yesterday for public comment their findings from a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001. This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building. Here is the conclusion:

“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, ..."

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/09/04/the-official-story-of-the-collapse-of-wtc-building-7-lies-in-ruins/

My story has a happy ending - will the FLX results be likewise?