Member Info for Ninetopprizesof

Who crashed the ETF's...and why?

Hopefullygold, "Copied and screenshot all your posts even the ones you believe you have deleted…..just in case you never know"

That is not normal behaviour!

Doesn't come as a surprise to me either.

I see the Dr Who anorak is spouting absolute chyte again!

Why he feels the need to constantly criticise posters with good intentions is beyond me.

We may well be big ants passing through bankboy, however, whilst having no wish to court controversy, or indeed sound unapreciative in your getting back to me, your response, upon initial reading, appears to be meaningless. Perhaps my understanding of what you say could be described as less than rudimentary. Elaboration in plain terms might be helpful?

I'm of the opinion that Monday's Q will just be a carry of what we already know, not a huge catalyst for the SP as such.

The Havieron FS is the one most are waiting for. I'm fairly confident there will be no mention in the Q of a delay in its release.

Watchful Wednesday.

Hi bankboy, you say "OTC equity swaps looking good for GGP."

I'd be grateful if you could expand on that - layman's terms would be good.

Substantial shareholders table shows impossible stake percentages (e.g., >100%) — obviously a data or label error.

Valuation vs balance-sheet cash: the cash number used in the valuation table is higher than the FY25 cash on the balance sheet; the report doesn’t explain why, so we can’t reconcile the two.

Can't understand why they chopped off 8 years life and culled the tonnage.

All said and done - pizz poor effort.

Well i guess if we have bucket loads of it leslie, pj makes a valid point.

Never heard of gallium before, what's at O'Callaghan's that would be of interest?

Not lending.

Supplier - Sprott - Simple

Post after post, parading fabricated lives—claims of wealth, happiness, success—all smoke and mirrors. Just lonely souls spinning stories to feel seen, desperate to blend into a world that rewards illusion.

Wednesday. lets call it Watchful Wednesday - Proper news, none of this pally pally pretence.

Nap, don't avoid the question I pose with reflection on anything I have uttered in the past. That would simply reveal you to be...

Remind everyone of the value you have brought to this board.

It may have been research that you've misinterpreted - which of course is forgivable, it may have been research that has brought to our attention something that some may have missed?

I think I know the answer.

Taverham, you are mistaken.

Utter nonsense. Stop with your hype. Results will be in the Q.

Doozer, market was closed

For whatever reason, Rio weren't interested. More fool them perhaps?

Monty - "Do you have an idea off the costs associated with getting new licences and the ongoing costs. Are the expensive and hence the need to cherry pick?"

I'd hazard a guess and say cost doesn't lie behind the "cherry picking".

The three licences E45/6118, E45/6119 and E45/6120 have no known past drilling — they’re effectively untested ground. I can find no reported collars or WAMEX entries inside them

Our nearby tenements (Black Hills North E45/6134, Rudall E45/5533, Scallywag E45/4701, Black Hills E45/4512) have seen soil sampling, geophysics and drilling that found gold‑and‑copper indicators.

Those nearby results make the new E45s plausible targets — they don’t prove anything is under them, but they give clear reasons to explore there first.

Chilly (on Strickland E45/4807): reconnaissance RC with a best result of 37 m @ 0.21 g/t Au + 0.13% Cu from 136 m, including 1 m @ 6.1 g/t Au from 137 m — shows the corridor carries both Au and Cu at shallow to mid depths and is open along strike toward the E45/6118–6120 area.

Teague: drilling intersected sulphide veining and alteration — confirms structurally controlled mineralising systems in the same regional belt.

Rudall (E45/5533): deeper drilling has demonstrated the corridor can host significant, deep mineralisation and provides a structural/geophysical template that could project under neighbouring polygons.

Black Hills / Black Hills North / Scallywag: soil and drill work returned weak–moderate Au and Cu anomalism and mapped structural/alteration zones that continue to the boundaries of E45/6118–6120.

E45/6118 sits adjacent to Black Hills North and Rudall; structures and anomalies found on those tenements could reasonably continue into 6118 along the same trends.

E45/6119 lies where the Scallywag trend and Black Hills North trends converge; it’s a logical place for strike‑continuation targets.

E45/6120 borders Scallywag and Black Hills, so any mineralised zones stepping across those granted tenements could extend under 6120.

My sheets aren't quite up to date on these, but I'm sure someone will have up to date data.

Hopefullygold,

Hubristic? 

Billy's weekly liar?

It's obvious to me and no doubt others that you are trolling me. You've had that gibberish stored, ready to pounce.

I've no idea what your gobbledygook is supposed to mean?

Furthermore, in what way does it relate to what I have just posted?

I'm all for debate and opinion, general conversation, but it does seem you love to follow the track of personal attack?

What sort of person are you? What have I done to make you target me with your hatred?

No PJ, he didn't. I suggest you re-listen. Seperate announcement - yes. Seperate to the quarterly - he most certainly didn't say!

I suggest he meant seperate from his Americas presentation?