Member Info for NikeAir180

... The 200%:gain is accuarte, comfoartably cllear of 2k from £700 and a few cheap pub meals worth. The 93% negative return is still liquid. All bye the but if I see I made a mistake re. reality, I will correct. Now tea, soon. : )

15:22... Best individual stock return is actually around 500%, I needed to subtract 230 from 1375, before then doing 1145/230...

I have ignored the 53p...

Less time for tea. 🌕

Best return of any individual stock is around 600%, next best is around 200% the worst negative return (not RRR) is a 93% loss easily conterbalanced by each one of the good ones, yep RRR is quite down, but might be more like a sea mammal than a stone in the sea bed and then maybe more like a land mammal than a pebble on the beach which regularly meets the sea.

Things to do and got to be out in the sunshine soon, after more tea.

AimDogs, they are looking better than naysayers' recent posts.

You are wrong again Banbury.

How's that charity donation going Theeeduke? Nominated by Helpful in case you lost that bet that you lost.

Blueboy, you went short on accuracy and long on exaggeration.

On the other hand, 22:06 wasn't virtuous. Seeing as you liked to rhyme it out - it is better that it is regarded non-literally. I believe the carryover from the point of view with regard to the topical stuff is the hostile environment towards someone with other views, it is another way of thinking about an example of disrespect, and then perhaps thinking back here to "waterboarding", open disrespect conveyed, discussing some posters on this share chat and making derogatory dismissive comments about them within your posts and creating new posts to denigrate one or more posters.

Peace in the pubs... with respect to others.

15:04: TT for total tosh.

Less than the great Don Bradman's internatiomal average in my opinion. 🏏

... steady - stadyily - steadily, still 3%. ✅

Just one walk home back then, the battery is at 3% but it will have more juice again. 🍻

Incorrect blueboy, no alchohol for moi this week so far. Have not been anywhere near drunk for the entirety of 2026 thus far, good chance it will stay that way. 23/12/25 - it took me a long time to slow and stadyily walk a few miles home on early am 24/12/25 - didn't realise it was open to 01:00... so chucked down some spirits as well.. I wanted to try the blue vodka but was still not drunk, don't think I posted for at least hours aferwards, perhaps inclusive of days.

Quite easy to type 31/01/31 sober or not, easy to correct but 2026 and 2025 are five or six years away from 2031.

17:33: Ciao Banbury, I know why you substituted and the post that you actually put up on 31/03/26, four minutes after the link Helpful posted, is still the one that is idiotic.

17:33: Hello Banbury, I know why you substituted and your post on 31/03/25, five minutes after the link Helpful put up, remains idiotic.

The humour got diluted.

08:51: incorrect as you know... 🤣

Some are open 24 hours, suits owls, larks, and people who want all day access without being restricted to having to finish by a set time, other than whatever personal time pressures or schedules are relevant.

Incorrect and wrong Banbury. Nothing in your RRR posts suggests respect (or disrepect) for people who did or do "go down the pit". I once saw a retrospective debate between Michael Foot and Ted Heath with regard to the then Common Market, it concluded after skilfull provocation wih Foot replying to Heath "I was an internationalist long before you" and Heath laughing but with and as a result... of determined banter.

Yep, many socialists are internationalist in attitude and do want improved conditions and comfort for the many and perhaps an increased share of wealth without negating wealth. Trade unions leaders believe on good pay for their workers, they won't all be socialists but that is another example where internatiolists attitudedes might often apply.

A condescending attitude re. an application of motley crew and your dismissive attitde with regard to potential housing and your application of "mud huts" suggests to me a socialist you are not.

Mud huts and igloos can be quite harmoniois and efficient relevant to their environments.

I believe helping the many and not unnecessarily hampering the few and though not a socialist, I don't think that has to be a point of difference between myself and some who are and it may not be.

Cheers

Separately.... ✅

Eventually got it right on a train.