Member Info for NikeAir180

Sometimes funny over there but I correctly estimate the closing remark of 14:36 to be untrue. 🙂

Sometimes funny... but I correctly estimate 14:35 to be untrue. : )

Ha ha, was thinking of saying, I could never (to a good standard) play musical instruments... Four years further back, I witnessed someone being thrown over two rows of chairs in music before class commenced, that was, soon to be, two other sports people and also a good landing. Only other similar incident I was aware of. The incident throwers were fast.

Stopped doing music two years later but it was after 15 out of twenty for devising something on an electric keyboard. I like a coincidence. : )

Not that bold with regard to 13:21 and it is false.

Banbury, I was one of maybe a few who could approximately do that, there weren't many.

Some tables... maths wasn't as easy. : )

"Approximately", maybe you were sort of right re. the non-foraging. 👣- parallel landing / distance. 🪂

Applogies: of - not off. And that was not even angry but could have followed an "Eff", so to speak.

13:21: That answer is not true.

Two double tables I suppose - four in total perhaps, as the skilful landing was at the back of the room after starting near the front, quite near the absent teacher's desk. 🙂

And to be fair: I do actually remember Helpful's comment as "No idea if it it true or not" but finished the quotation with the certain part of the memory, tone wise, I think it was "No idea if it is true or not".

Now Aimdogs, he didn't think I was a teacher's pet but when we were mid-teens, one of my peers back then who you do remind off did think he could have go in a classroom where I would chat in relation to the subject being taught. There was one occasion where ge decided to stand in from of me and unwisely had another go just as I had arrived, he was chucked over two large tables and landed on his feet, dipped his knees on the landing, after that he would just say "Hello" if near enough to be polite, it was also one young sportsman to another.

I play fair 😇. ✌

I read it back then Banbury, as I have commented before, so you were talking tosh st 11:39. It was a link to someone's post on Twitter and Helpful commented: "No idea if it is true".

Well, it doesn's seem like exploration has commenced on the licenses relevant to RRR because commencement of exploration in 2026 would be subject to permitting as per the linked announcement via 22:52 post yesterday, page heading detailed: 30 January 2026.

14:25: and that announcement was dated: 30 January 2026 on the page heading.

An"e" of the type which was no detraction from good health. 🍻

Too many e's - to see... applicable expression. 😎

Anyway, just "straw man" stuff at 19:33, though if humour can be a type of joke I thank you blueboy, I had a word for some of your comments but had forgotten the applicable xpression - which did come back to me when it was still pm.

Cheers ... : )

Actually Blueboy he was interpreting potential progress with more sense of speed and optimism than myself although I do think progress is possible.

The 18/10/24 RRR announcement was a Reach announcement, in brief summary it was referring to 75 termite samples and 19 rock chip samples - with regard to multi elements re. all samples and potential lithium with regard to the Djekanou license.

The 18/10/24 Reach announcement was not specifically referring to gold which was the core asset of focus for RRR pertaining to its Ivory Coast licenses.

The RNS announcement of 15/10/25 detailed the condional sale of RRR's Ivory Coast licences and applications pertaining to its gold exploration.

Re. 18:25: various gold assets - a couple of other companies seemed to agree with RRR - with regard to some RNS' last year.

Real assets...

Re. 16:50: ... second paragraph Banbury: you were referring to an an actually non-existent contrast based on a non-comment with regard to Cote d'Ivoire and the RRR announcement of 15/10/25 & subsequent real comments on this share chat - pertaining to that and thus stated an irrelevant conclusion.

Nah... then they wouldn't be AI feeds.

😄 😄