Member Info for NikeAir180

... who said he was quoting from an email which mentioned storage.

I should have typed an rather than the, in the previous message. : )

Re. 21:08: with regard to the quoted words from 17:18 - that is a correct quotation from 17:18 but in that earlier post it was not a correct quotation by Banbury - from the poster who said he was quoting from the email which mentioned storage - and so in effect when Banbury was attributing "Pathetic": that could logically be interpreted as attributable to the message he posted at 17:18.

If one of us refers to an RNS, a broadcast or history of the company, others reading the share chat can subsequenty verify for themselves what was in the public domain or might have already done so and can check back if they wish.

A private communciation such as an email from the boss of a company cannot be readily assessed in the same way, if the content of such is relayed on here it still isn't public information as it appeared in its original form unlike a referred to RNS - which can be checked or remembered in its original form by the readers of a post (not just limited to them) is accessible in the public domain - has a clear presentation as an original source within chronology.

RNS' of 15/11/23, 11/12/23 and 28/03/24 contrast with Banbury's alternative, imagined history in his penultimate sentence at 17:18.

They are readily accessible as original source material, in the form of their original presentation, in the public domain unlike claimed quoted and / or re-distributed content of a privately communicated email.

You are misquoting the person who claimed they quoted from an email Banbury - which if correct was a breach of rule 5d of the chat rules: a private communication which cannot be verified - and so you wouldn't know, non-verbatim, if you were paraphrasing. Your attribution of "pathetic" is without meaningful substance.

Cause and Effect, Chronology and Correlation - they're not always easy to distinguish correctly.

03:28: Correct AimDogs, profit was taken on 01/11/23 following the weighted aggregate of two buys in second half of October 2023, entire position sold from that wrapper - only about 5% profit but a profit is a profit. Early 2022 following from late December 2021 exit was taken from RRR following first buy very late 2021, higher average share price but buys and sells were in all small tranches - not sure I beat commission - so I regard that as break even range.

I have one other wrapper with RRR shares - first bought in summer of 2022 - have always maintained a position in that one, have maintained both RRR positions since autumn 2024, could have taken a 30% gain on one of them but genuinely no regret, multiples have been taken from other stocks and a fund.

I've already made a profit on RRR Theeeduke so you were wrong on that one and I have taken profits on other junior minng explorers - and have got paper gains at the moment on some junior mining expolorers with world class assets. Yes RRR is down at the moment but I still like its assets.

IPCM and RRR - that potential might not have completed - think it was relevant to a company they were invested in, RRR never said it was going to complete ... "If" haven't got much time to trawl through - but went a year+ past relevant RNS...

The fact is tbey have completed some deals, their deal with Soma completedand they and they got cash for that last year. RRR have historically made investments in companies and sometimes sold at profit - inclusive of POW in recent years.

El Limon you've never well backed up your claims and I've answered you well before - they often reported profitable months and it was a profitable asset as per annual report of 2012.

Theeeduke were you in Greatland Gold back to when Bell was Chairman?

Anyway, time for food, relaxation and t.v. will check in again many hours later.

One more thing: junor mining companies / explorers sometimes have ups and downs but are sometimes quite nimble and I think Bell was quite nimble during the latter half of last year.

Will be home very soon Theeeduke, then time to sort out a late meal, perhaps watch a bit of Sky News and "The Wrap", need to get off the bus in good time. 🙂

Spec, I consider the deal with Soma to be a fair agreement between both parties. I did expect an RNS or at leat a Reach by Wednesday of this week, following on from recent developments. Turned out it was an RNS at 07:00 so that was timely and with valid content in my opinion. I think it is well run and have voted as recommended by the company with regard to next week's AGM.

Too hasty there blueboy....

Correction of date at 17:38 regarding RRR's largest overall profitable year thus far - twas annual report of 29/11/11 - profits by june 30th of that year, before tax were approximately £14,000,000.

By the time of the annual report of 2011, at that time RRR had achieved some consistent profitable years of profit, two consecutive years of profits following a profitable year in 2008, following public listing in the second half of 2005.

After 2011 there were overall profitable years for RRR in 2018 and 2020 - confirmed by annual reports. The last few years have been challenging but it is not impossible that there could be decent and perhaps good years ahead.

18:10: You've tried a variation of that type of humour with another positive poster on this share chat Banbury and such stuff is a variance of you attacking the poster rather than the comments, where you try to gain an advantage, within the share chat, over a positive poster through crap comedy but it doesn't work out too well for you and neither would trying to run off with a house.

Three of those five years: profits before tax were in the millions, as per 29/11/25 annual report RRR profits were a few million in excess of £10,000,000.

All true blueboy - which is why you try to dish it out. The other one by myself was just through air, he was a couple of inches taller and a stone heavier than me but biomechanics and speed... his chin was picked up in one hand (I didn't want to hit him) and he was trown tbhrough air - a few yards and landed heavily but safely on the floor which was also a ceiling. Bit of a loud thud etc, he got up shocked.

As I said to you before blueboy1975, I'm quite a nice guy so on that day which was just six of one, half a dozen of the other (no alchohol) I turned him (us both) to remove his risk of falling into the basketball court on the floor below, from whence it started that day. Technically I put myself at more of the risk by doing that but I was in control and had the speed and the quick calculation.

Fitness blue'75 - technically five s', for most of my life I have had and do naturally have plenty of three ... speed, stamina and strengh, sometimes good skill, suppleness is decent.

Even when very young blue' - no heroes for me and power is from within, exercised or at rest - it's why I'm not cruel and why I don't try and take advantage through rubbish posts, plenty of other people have that decency as well.

Then owned El Limon asset profitable in 2012 before selling the retained royalty last year, well done RRR and relevant parties. 🍻

Overall profits to RRR in 2008, 2010, 2011, 2018 and 2020 according to the annual reports and sometimes in the millions before tax. Intraday high of 1.35 on 11/02/21 after opening at 1.23 before closing at 1.25.

The unknowing followed the unknown.

Re. 19:28: Bit of an echo there blueboy.

Re. 17:14: Your warping of been with a capital letter and subtraction of e is like an exaggeration of natural error. 🍻

17:24 - not double figures. 😉