Member Info for NikeAir180

The unknown was dated the 18th.

Video is also not playing for me beyond first two or three seconds, maybe technical Issue? Perhaps it will be resubmitted?

Re. 13:08, if my quick mental arithmetic is correct it looks to me like that RRR profit I took on 16/09/22 at 0.49 from the overall larger wrapper was quite near a 20% gain based on the two larger tranches bought at 0.4. SP figures are rounded as they appear on transaction history, on my contract notes they're fractionally under detailed rounded share prices.

Boring to repeat but I will for clarity: in the first wrapper I bought RRR very late 2021 and early 2022 in small tranches, sold and completely exited (for a while) via small tranches, average share price at sell was higher than average buy price but I don't think I beat the total commission there so I approximate that as a break even but with regard to larger tranches in the second wrapper detailed at 13:08 and what would have been a better value commision to me, that month it was definitely profit taken by me on RRR late summer 2022 and it was approximately a 20% gain. As said, I think it is the only time I took a gain on it but a profit is a profit.

Perhaps there will be, full RNS or a Reach this week. : )

... "mental" arithmetic. 😄

Well here is a real RRR one, which I wasn't aware of and have been checking back thoroughly, there will also be a correction of a previous comment...

Through the summer of 2022 in the second wrappein which I have always maintained a RRR ppsition since the first buy, three tranches of RRR shares were bought: 506,329 shares at 0.4. 252,000 shares at 0.4. 100,000 shares at 0.47. On 16/09/22, I sold 52,470 shares from my RRR position at 0.49, commission will have been lower as there were sunstantial buys and sells the month before, it was early days in that wrapper and I was moving around quite a lot. The 0 49 sale was clearly a profit - not much but it was a profit compared to the average of the previous three tranches, the sell was the fourth RRR tranche in that wrapper.

The sale of the stock in another company on 29/07/24 was at a value of £115.25 (same warapper) and it was a 140% gain - you know, AimDogs, the company you were making incorrect posts on the week and near days before.

I am going to thank you specinvestor99, I checked back as I thought it might actually have been weeks worth of the value of fast food meals regarding 01/11/23 but in fairness I have to correct myself on that, it was a approximately a 5% loss to the total commission which I did not beat that on that day compared the the average of the two buys from thr previous month - one if those buys was for £160 excluding pence, I have repeatedly included that cost as £100 when doing quick and flawed menral arithmetic, therefore, I apologise to other posters and readers for my incorect comment as 01/11/23 - I sold at an exact middle average SP of between two previous buys at different weightings from the month before but the wrongly assumed gain was actally a loss to the total commission.

Happily on 16/09/22, it was a genuine profit in that wrapper, I think it was the only one taken from RRR but I am pleased to have found it. 🏝

No but it would have been enough for several days of decently sized meals from there, so tangible none the less.

In hindsight, you were wrong with regard to a stock on 26/07/24, AimDogs and with regard to the tactic you were advocating for on the near days leading up to that - in light of the fact that it had two phases of 200% gains on 29/07/24. I took a 140% gain that day, in between those two phases as I recall so could have been better but main thing was, it was better than before, also a better result for me than if I had sold it on tbe 26th.

As for RRR, it was approximately a 5% profit for me on 01/11/23 but a modest profit is still a profit and it would have been easily enough for a good quality meal, desert and refreshment. 🍻

Re. 06:39: false comment by you Banbury, I never said "joke" with regard to that, 01:37 - 17/02/26 or since. And you were generally trolling, again.

And I do not think that it was a foretelling: "Three RNS in a day?" because of the question mark, I read it as one joke at the time.

Re. 18:11: It was Rocket... but it was banter. Lettuce before, afterwards yesterday.

Three RNS in a day was a rangey joke from an enthusiastic perspective - partly designed to wind up trolls. It's a highlight for you.

If RRR ever does, boldly go into copper production, there could be rockets following their Enterprise.

... "tongue" - goes well with beens and lettuce - two parts of my meal yesterday. Chee(r)s e. 🍞 🍎

🍻 😇 - healthy stuff.

17:22 - garbled final sentence.

He previously defended it Banbury - in the context of previous remarks, which you have previously engaged with.

... slang.

... "butchered" it read like a bit of sarcasm, banter - chronologically following on from previous discussion from a while ago where some naysayers had derided RRR communications via Reach documents. To summarise from memory: Helpful had said something along the lines that a Reach document was a way for a company to discuss general progress and or intentions - a type of update which is not deemed price sensitive, a full RNS - deemed to be potentially price sensitive is thoroughly scrutinised by the Nomad. In different comments, both Banbury and Helpful understood that some general aspects of RRR endeavour were not well enough established to be deemed acceptable commentary in full RNS publications and thus some RRR commentary - the greater proportion at the time was appearing via Reach communications, rather than full RNS documents. I regarded it as an emphasis style descriptive joke / banter and non-specific beyond an undestandable sequence within chronology.

... followed an exchange ...

8 years and slighty over four months ago to Helpful's first RRR post - 10/11/17 at 0.58, yes it was slightly beyond 1p in 2018: e.g. Intraday in March 2018 and it was futher beyond 1p with an intraday of 1.35 during february 2021.

You posted from, what I recall, once or twice, Banbury, on RRR later in 2021, then more regularly from 2022 onwards and your increased posting on RRR followed an exchage with Spec' in 2022.

Helpful, there was also a response by Banbury to the second photo, at 17:27 on 08/02/26, he specifically referred to three, whilst aware there were four.

... and my take away is actually cooling.

00:28 was actualy responding to 21:05.