Member Info for NikeAir180

17:25: Wrong on RRR again, Banbury. The relevannt RNS' from POW and RRR on 19/06/24, confirm competion. RRR still need to make a final payment but the deal to acquire all of NBGC ... RRAL, completed on 19/06/24. You have been corrected on this matter before, you have been aware of that correction within your previous posts.

16:28: Incorrect David.M, RRR do own 100% of RRAL as per section 11 of the Annual Report of 22/12/25 and the RNS of 19/06/24. I haven't paid the entirety of my mortgage off, I still own the flat. The concepts of ownership with some payment still to be honoured are not that far apart, conceptually.

12:45: Annual Reports... Five overall profitable years, thus far.

... asset.

In 2012, RRR's majority owned El Limon aset was profitable, they were majority owners of the subsidiary company doing the production. Well done them. 🍻

... advert box from the website didn't help with that.

On a lighter note, although not necessarily percentagewise, I had Helles lager this week, which I presume is diferent from Hells lager - both quite pleasant, though I often go for warmer beer in winter.

12:30: Apologies for typo ... screen protector damage on that part of the keypad.

I was referriring to a specif detail blueboy1975 so your first sentence at 11:23 is false. I responded to you last month where I considered you to have embellished. As I said to you this week, Hellful has responded to RRR RNS' and Bell broadcasts.

Whether RRR and Bell fulfill aims expressed in RNS' and broadcasts are aspects pertaining to them. I see the Dalaroo Metals RNS, Helpful posted this morning has direct relevance to recent RNS updates by RRR.

Repeatedly you have previously tried to ignore in misrepresentative posts that RRR did have some positive achievements inclusive of profitable years: 2008, 2010, 2011, 2018 and 2020, on some occasions profits before tax were in the millions, as per relevant annual reports.

Te.09:05: "Tin Hill 5m tonnes per annum do the maths.", I do remember that line from Banbury which has previously typed - the quotation is from him and nothing that Helpful typed: 5 million? was a rhetorical question, a joke within a range - to convey percievable absurdity of the post he was responding to.

Re. 09:38: the "un-truth" is yours Banbury, Bell aniticipated - Post Year Events - from Chairman's Statement - annual Report of 22/12/25: an "initial contribution to profit during the current year", he did not stipulate anticipation of that, with the first half of the year.

Re. 18:30: they acknowledged the ongoing renewal process.

Annual Report: 22/12/25: ... "expired and remain subject to an ongoing renewal process with the relevant autorities".

Annual report: 22/12/25 - Sections: 6, 11, 12 and 27, following on from Section 1.5 and Auditors earlier comments.

Trees, they contribute to Earth's atmosphere Banbury, however much you have tried to create a hostile atmsosphere for some in various share chats - that type of choice is theirs, mine and not yours.

Closing remark of 15:00 - another conceptual stone, without knowledge.

... editing, many times.

Re. 10:57: wrong on this share chat again Banbury, I have only read today's posts this afternoon.

Technically Banbury, 10:57 - is not only false, it was also potentially a form of harassment. Today I chose to deal with it directly as I have doneany times with your false posts pertaining to myself, other times you have had posts removed for that - simple logic for you: if the administrators have removed such posts they would know that you were posting falsely, you have already lost one of those posts because it was regarded as harassment, some other posts have also been removed for evidentially false posts from yourself - all aspects of your trolling.

Ultimately this share chat is supposed to be about Red Rock Resources, you should not throw metaphorical stones my way, or in general as the intentional stone thrower is never so much better than others as they might think they are or wish to be perceived - you know perhaps to try and gain some sense of advantage here. Conceptual stones should just be the wonder of geology, in my opinion.

Re. 20:19 - last two words of the post, following the quotation: No - that was an expression of opinion from the original post. Helpful was responding to RRR RNS' and broadcasts, with positive sentiment which I think was genuine. Blueboy1975 was trying to rubbish and imply a slur regarding Helpful. Reality is RRR / Bell expressed RNS' and broadcasts so where we are now after those and before some future - no-one fully knows.

Although.... in the 22/12/25 annual report, Bell said $21 million dollars had been transferred.... so one aspect - $21 million (not $22.5m) can't be conclusively dismissed, yet. We await to see if it has been received and how RRR's part of the conceptual JV is, in relation to reality, in the future.

Nowhere...

$21 million but he's not always right on RRR.