Member Info for NigelHaemoglobin

So with an ORRI of 5% annual dividends would be 15-17p p/a on Darwin production alone? No wonder you guys are in this one. Will have a deeper look.

Nobby that is correct but Killick also (if I remember correctly) also guide and advise investors: much 'higher end' than HL who have been a real pain recently.

Either progress has diverged from EIS estimates or equivocal find ie O and/or G shows (fizzgas) only so far based on price action, possibly duster/water wet.

Still, happy to be wrong...if they are late running the final liners there's still a chance.

By all means sit behind your keyboard biffing furiously novice: all I offered is that, from the start of the drill up to this afternoon there has been no evidence in the trading patterns of any sort of a discovery.

There may well be a find but no unequivocal signs yet my boy...

Total tosh of the very highest order.

What's the point in holding the whole pile to the ops update RNS? No sign of even a whiff of Methane so far!!

You must be confident, holding equally as many shares as the Financial Director...

The very last thing to be concerned about, 28 days of continuous well ops now and no sign of anything in the trading patterns. Theoretical g.c.o.s beginning to converge with reality?

No sign of either shares or return of unused funds, thanks HL!

Of course it is! Why would Harbour spaff away 43% of their 2P+2C (in reality will be 70%).

Buy and hold.

Time to start calling, just for amusement, duster, equivocal result, gas and/or oil discovery prior to the RNS.

I’m going for duster.

The US has with very few exceptions always produced awful cars. Teslas are absolutely ****e!

Well you will only be able to sell in the success RNS case.

Useful stuff, doesn't exactly help if 'tight' operations are the expectation though...

If on schedule it's nearly 7" casing time.

Caution is required IMO, the offer is far from generous at 1:29. Loyal shareholders are being given the chance to participate at a minority level ie well below that of institutional investors. Quite why they name some of these outfits ‘institutions’ is a total mystery!

Always best to be flexible with AIM stocks, nothing wrong with opinion reversals.

Nothing wrong with an explorers EIS, it’s the subsequent burning of fossil fuels which triggers the nutjobs.

There is no causal link between the hurricane and fossil fuel burning but at some point in the future an international legal precedent will be set.

Decided to bolt, small profit made. Does anyone else agree that the fuse of environmentalism is now irreversibly lit? Even in the event of a find years of legal procrastination could demolish any probability that the licences are ever monetised.

I'm in, there is some risk but the reward is now well over the inflection point.

GOOD LUCK ALL!!